• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Third-rail locomotives

Status
Not open for further replies.

mallard

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2009
Messages
1,304
I always thought that "Multiple Unit" basically meant "distributed traction" i.e. there are multiple traction units in a (fixed formation) train. Of course, single units slightly (121s, 153s) fall foul of this definition as do units with a single power vehicle (VEPs, 321s, etc.).

Guess I'm not really sure what MU means then!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Schnellzug

Established Member
Joined
22 Aug 2011
Messages
2,926
Location
Evercreech Junction
Let's ask the oracle...

"The term multiple unit or MU is used to describe a self-propelled carriages capable of coupling with other units of the same or similar type and still being controlled from one driving cab. The term is commonly used to denote passenger trainsets consisting of more than one carriage. Single self-propelling carriages (also called railcars, rail motor coaches or railbuses) can be referred to as multiple units if capable of operating with other units."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_unit
 

starrymarkb

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2009
Messages
5,985
Location
Exeter
How did I miss the 73s? :oops:

Interesting to see the debate over whether Eurostars are MUs or not - the way I look at it is that if the main 'carriage' that is hauling the train has passengers during regular service, then it is not a locomotive but a unit, hence 73s are locos (although there is a place where passengers could go, they generally don't) and therefore the Eurostars are too :) (that is probably the wrong way to look at it, and I expect that some more learnéd members may prove me wrong by naming a locomotive that does/did have passenger seating in it, but hey ho!)

(Incidentally, does that make the restored GWR railmotor an SMU?)

Is this a Unit or Locomotive
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3a/Sbb_rbe540.jpg/800px-Sbb_rbe540.jpg

In some cases these Swiss Railcars will run around their train like a locomotive. BTW - That thing has 2660hp! More then an HST powercar ;)
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,390
Location
Taunton or Kent
Eurostars used to run on third rail, then st pancras and section 2 of hs1 was built, and all the shoes on the stock was removed, so now they only have pantographs. ;)
 

Oracle

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2006
Messages
1,410
Location
Near Ashurst New Forest Station
I recall that there were Pressed Steel railcars used on Paddington-Hayes & Harlington and -Greenford services that operated also with single-car unpowered trailers. I saw one once used as a 'shunter' with a p/way hopper wagon in Southall Yard.

Of course we also had the SR MLVs that could be coupled as a luggage van on trains, or coupled together, or be used as locomotives to tow wagons. With batteries they could run off-juice as well.
 

es373

Member
Joined
19 May 2011
Messages
468
Location
London
Hasn't this turned into a fascinating thread; we'll be arguing about what the meaning of is is next :oops: . So an Eurostar should strictly be a EFFT, then (Electric Fixed Formation Train).


Not quite. As I stated earlier that they can be split in 3 areas. Should all of the bogies be articulated then yes it would be an EFFT.
 

fairysdad

Member
Joined
27 Dec 2010
Messages
958
Location
London, Surrey... bit of a blur round here...
Is this a Unit or Locomotive
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3a/Sbb_rbe540.jpg/800px-Sbb_rbe540.jpg

In some cases these Swiss Railcars will run around their train like a locomotive. BTW - That thing has 2660hp! More then an HST powercar ;)
Stop messing with my view of the world please!!! If I had seen that without being told, I'd assume it was a unit. In fact, I'm not entirely sure that you're not messing with me...

Actually, looking it up on Wikipedia, they claim it to be an Electric Multiple Unit, but actually it does look like a loco but with passengers, and you can't always trust what's on Wikipedia :)
 

mallard

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2009
Messages
1,304
Stop messing with my view of the world please!!! If I had seen that without being told, I'd assume it was a unit. In fact, I'm not entirely sure that you're not messing with me...

Well, if you really want to confuse the definition of a "Multiple Unit", how about classes 438 and 488!

I suppose a 438 could be considered an "unpowered multiple unit" (UMU?) since it has cabs, but 488s were really "just" Mk2 carriages.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top