The next station is...!

[Xenophon PCDGS]

Cwmbach

 

[A Challenge]

Aberdare

 

[A Challenge]

The next leg will start somewhere where the stations are actually not much easier to spell, Gowerton

 

[Andy Pacer]

Swansea

 

[A Challenge]

Llanelli

 

[Andy Pacer]

Bynea

 

[A Challenge]

Llangennech

 

[Andy Pacer]

Pontarddulais

 

[A Challenge]

Pantyffynnon

 

[Xenophon PCDGS]

Pantyffynnon

 

[Andy Pacer]

Ammanford

 

[A Challenge]

Llandybie

 

[Andy Pacer]

Ffairfach

 

[Xenophon PCDGS]

Llandeilo

 

[DanTrain]

Lingwood

Sorry to bring this up again, but does anything do Brundall Gardens to Lingwood without stopping?

 

[A Challenge]

I posted two consecutive moves (Brundall Gardens and Lingwood) - that means (I think) that whole leg is invalid - will check the timetables

Scrap that - I thought Brundall and Brundall Gardens were the other way round - I now have no clue what happened there!

 

[clagmonster]

I've been asked to have a look at a leg which concluded a couple of pages ago. My findings are below, feel free to send a PM to myself and DarrenR if you feel I have missed something.

First off, the following two moves were made by the same player in consecutive posts, thus Lingwood is an invalid move.

Brundall

Lingwood

Therefore, as far as I can see this is the winner as I don't see a way out. I see no train which does Brunall Gardens to Lingwood non stop.

Brundall Gardens

I got a little confused working my way through that lot, so if I have made an error, please let me know.

 

[Darren R]

Everything was fine until...

Haddiscoe

Reedham

This was followed by:

Cantley

Berney Arms

This is correctly struck-through, as it was pipped by the previous posting of Cantley.

Buckenham (long wait it turns out)

This was the valid move following on from Cantley.

Brundall Gardens

This post seem to have been a mistake, with the two Brundall stations getting mixed up, and is correctly struck-through.

Brundall

Although Buckenham to Brundall is valid, it would have resulted in two consecutive moves by the same player.

Brundall

This is the next valid post after Buckenham.

Lingwood

This is invalid as it is a second consecutive post by andyallen4014.

Brundall Gardens

This is the next valid move from Brundall. As Norwich has already been played, this is the winning move.

 

[Darren R]

clagmonster is obviously a faster typist than I am!

 

[Darren R]

Putting an end to the confusion and leaving it all behind us...

Llandeilo

Llangadog

 

[Xenophon PCDGS]

Llanwrda

 

[Andy Pacer]

Everything was fine until...






This was followed by:





This is correctly struck-through, as it was pipped by the previous posting of Cantley.



This was the valid move following on from Cantley.



This post seem to have been a mistake, with the two Brundall stations getting mixed up, and is correctly struck-through.



Although Buckenham to Brundall is valid, it would have resulted in two consecutive moves by the same player.



This is the next valid post after Buckenham.



This is invalid as it is a second consecutive post by andyallen4014.



This is the next valid move from Brundall. As Norwich has already been played, this is the winning move.

EDIT

In post #134123 I was asked, by an adjudicator, to unstrike my Brundall post, and having re-read the instruction I should also strike through Lingwood which then removes my consecutive moves. As this was done by adjudication, I have now struck through it, so can @Darren R please advise where that leaves us.

 

[Xenophon PCDGS]

In post #134123 I was asked, by an adjudicator, to unstrike my Brundall post, and having re-read the instruction I should also strike through Lingwood which then removes my consecutive moves. As this was done by adjudication, I have now struck through it, so can @Darren R please advise where that leaves us.

As the current leg started on posting # 134132 at Gowerton, is the matter on a previous leg now ended?

 

[Andy Pacer]

As the current leg started on posting # 134132 at Gowerton, is the matter on a previous leg now ended?

As far as i'm concerned they're not, as assumptions have been made based on what I was asked to do by an adjudicator, but as this was based on the previous leg i'm happy to continue the current leg though whilst I await a resolution.

Llandovery

 

[Xenophon PCDGS]

Llandovery

Cynghordy

 

[Andy Pacer]

Sugar Loaf

 

[DanTrain]

Llanwrtyd

Thanks @clagmonster and @Darren R For clearing that mess up!

 

[A Challenge]

I have to echo @DanTrain, I really got confused there

Llangammarch

 

[DanTrain]

Garth

 

[Andy Pacer]

I have to echo @DanTrain, I really got confused there

Unfortunately there is still the question of my apparent ‘double post’ which your adjudication clearly shows isn’t a double post after all, so I’m awaiting @Darren R to look at that.