Xenophon PCDGS
Veteran Member
The Mail Online is a hilarious website. "Disgusted Of Tonbridge" would be at home with it.![]()
Would this be any relation to the famous "twin set and pearls" harridan who goes by the nom de plume of "Offended of Orpington".
The Mail Online is a hilarious website. "Disgusted Of Tonbridge" would be at home with it.![]()
As a very infrequent reader then your opinion can not be based on the 'odd time' you happen to 'find' one on the train.
I read the Sun daily and whilst its not my only place for news to claim it not journalism followed by claims of 'I prefer to read XYZ' is the sort of sneery ignorance of such people who think they are better because they read the Guardian. Pathetic but says it all really.
It seems that people who buy The Sun are more likely to leave it on a train (perhaps a judgement of how low quality it is?).
It's also a lot cheaper though so leaving it on a train is the equivalent of a X00% saving over doing the same with any half-decent paper. As much as I hate to admit it, if commuters wanted something to read on the train and can't find a Metro/ES, a cheap option would be Murdoch's red top rubbish![]()
The Guardian is now being given free to first class passengers on Virgin - do these count as sales? if so then presumably they will show an increase soon.
Though I do like the irony of the Guardian and its constant 'CUTS CUTS CUTS ARE BAD ' stories are now having to again take more drastic action themselves due to losing money. This time it wont be voluntary though.
And hwo can the paper have such low readership if its the lefties favourite rag? Are you all now reading it for free online? Chortle.
It's a complete non-story.
It's also a lot cheaper though so leaving it on a train is the equivalent of a X00% saving over doing the same with any half-decent paper. As much as I hate to admit it, if commuters wanted something to read on the train and can't find a Metro/ES, a cheap option would be Murdoch's red top rubbish![]()
Would this be any relation to the famous "twin set and pearls" harridan who goes by the nom de plume of "Offended of Orpington".
It's Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells.
In the previous set of circulation figures, The Times and Sun got a warning from the relevant Office for 'failing' to properly inform the Office of their true 'bulk' figures, thus distorting their real circulation figures and giving a false change in readership.
Don't forget "Gays ramming it down our throats"*It's entirely predictable though, isn't it? Aside from the Domestic politics, the Mail is so, so repetitive...
-Immigration/Asylum seekers
-Benefits
-BBC bashing
-Europe bashing
-______ causes cancer
-Period dramas on TV
-Things were better back then
Above all, it's really boring, but I suppose if that's what makes you tick ...
I don't think they've used that slogan for years, have they?"It is are you.........."
I don't think the physical size matters, as long as the quality of the journalism remains the same. Those old broadsheet formats were too be big to be practical really.I read The Independent which claims the above, however there is no doubt it leans towards the left but not slavishly though.
My subscription costs £5 per week against a cover value £9.60 which shows the desperation in clinging onto circulation made by todays publications.
One aspect I do mourn is the "shrinkage" of the quality press whether it be to the Berliner (Guardian format) or tabloid size. Only The Telegraph, FT, ST and Herald up here retain full broadsheet format.
East Coast are now giving away The Times and as mentioned Virgin The Guardian and FT, both used to feature The Independent.
However I will read any newspaper left behind whatever its political orientation![]()
I pay about £4 (but it's due to go up next year) per week for my Times subscription. That includes The Times and Sunday Times iPad apps (the papers and supplements in app form, plus additional extras), the iPhone app, website access and Times+ membership.
You can get vouchers for the physical papers on Saturday and Sunday as well for the same price![]()