• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

The future does not look good for 141108

Status
Not open for further replies.

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,180
The Railcar Association website confirms that 141108 is owned by Locomotive Services Limited, as speculated earlier in the thread.

That's a very interesting development! LSL becoming a real jack of all trades!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,352
Location
Yorkshire
That's a very interesting development! LSL becoming a real jack of all trades!
If the unit is going to be saved from the gas axe then that's great news, but I'm not sure how LSL will make money from a 141 based on their current income streams... unless they're going to use it for drags of 15x units to and from works or storage, but that's a long shot.
 

gazthomas

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2011
Messages
3,466
Location
Llandudno
Not for this forum, but one hopes the ownership of LSL doesn't do an "FM Rail" and terminally overstretch themselves
 

ed1971

Member
Joined
14 Jan 2009
Messages
589
Location
Wigan
I have been following Rob Bell's excellent 'Walking Britain's Lost Railways' series. Series 2 Episode 6 covers the Waverley Route. The Waverley Route Heritage Association is shown on the program.
They own the single carriage Pacer railbus RB004. He gets a ride on the unit. The video is shown here: "www.my5.tv/walking-britain-s-lost-railways/season-2/episode-6" at 35m20s. (The link is up until 23rd June).
RB004 appears to be the only serviceable Pacer in use with a Leyland TL11 engine and SCG R500 gearbox, assuming 141108 is just for a static display. Hopefully the class 140 will be restored one day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top