• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

The Batley & Spen by-election

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Joined
25 Jan 2016
Messages
556
Location
Wolverhampton
Several Bundle Check’s are currently ongoing, with folk suggesting a 300 win for LABOUR.


Absolutely MARVELLOUS result; even if's a majority of just 323!

Our vote fell by 8% on 2019 but the Tories also lost 2%, thanks to Galloway picking up 22% and that part squeeze of the Tory vote, is what seemingly did it.

That plus Hancock's scandal perhaps? Regardless, its a win and that is all that counts!
 

NorthOxonian

Established Member
Associate Staff
Buses & Coaches
Joined
5 Jul 2018
Messages
1,670
Location
Oxford/Newcastle
Absolutely MARVELLOUS result; even if's a majority of just 323!

Our vote fell by 8% on 2019 but the Tories also lost 2%, thanks to Galloway picking up 22% and that part squeeze of the Tory vote, is what seemingly did it.

That plus Hancock's scandal perhaps? Regardless, its a win and that is all that counts!
It certainly seems to have been a chaotic result. When it's that close you can never say for certainty what caused it, but I think Kim Leadbetter being the only local candidate in the race probably got her over the line. Had the Conservatives nominated someone more rooted in the community, rather than a bland councillor from the posh part of Leeds, that could have made all the difference.

This is just a rumour, but I heard (from a source I trust who knows people who were at the count) that Galloway won Batley and the Conservatives won the rest of the seat. Obviously that's just hearsay and should be taken with a pinch of salt, but it would be pretty likely given the figures. If true I suppose it's a good thing, because having the winner be someone who did reasonably well across all of Batley and Spen (rather than just very well in one half of it) might help bring the community together.
 

PR1Berske

Established Member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
3,025
Batley and Spen
1992 to present
(Image is a graph showing the summary of results in each general and by-election in the Batley and Spen by-election between 1992 and the present day)

VNK9wva.png
 

REVUpminster

Established Member
Joined
3 Jan 2021
Messages
1,275
Location
Paignton
When an election is this close the postal votes need to be carefully vetted as in big families they are all to easily manipulated.
 

pdq

Member
Joined
7 Oct 2010
Messages
894
Huge relief. I know Kim a little and her passion and enthusiasm for the local area and people's welfare is palpable.
I find it very sad that many people voted at a local level for an outsider largely on the basis of international policy. Hey ho.
 

PR1Berske

Established Member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
3,025
Huge relief. I know Kim a little and her passion and enthusiasm for the local area and people's welfare is palpable.
I find it very sad that 8000 people voted at a local level for an outsider on the basis of international policy. Hey ho.

He went immediately to a live-stream to confirm he will take the result to Electoral Court, labelling it a "banana republic" result and blaming the Returning Officer for refusing a recount.

I haven't had reason to check ROTPA for a while, but even I know that a Returning Officer can refuse a recount from a third-party candidate.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,426
Location
LBK
Galloway’s disgusting, backward, homophobic campaign saw him net 22% of the vote. There will be absolutely no discussion in the mainstream political agenda as to whether this is a problem because of the kind of people who voted for him.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,425
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Galloway’s disgusting, backward, homophobic campaign saw him net 22% of the vote. There will be absolutely no discussion in the mainstream political agenda as to whether this is a problem because of the kind of people who voted for him.
The problem is that 22% as you state is not just a small percentage total of the vote. not just a small number of people who appear to hold such views.
 

daodao

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2016
Messages
3,601
Location
Dunham/Bowdon
A reprieve for Starmer ..... :E
Yes - it is likely to prolong Starmer's maladroit tenure of the post of Labour party leader. While it would have been worse for Labour if the red wall had actually been breached, it is not a good result for the main opposition party.
 

Butts

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Jan 2011
Messages
11,826
Location
Stirlingshire
Galloway’s disgusting, backward, homophobic campaign saw him net 22% of the vote. There will be absolutely no discussion in the mainstream political agenda as to whether this is a problem because of the kind of people who voted for him.

What kind of people please extrapolate.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,425
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
I am not sure of what I heard on the radio, but did someone actually say that in the last 50 years, a party in power had only won three by-elections where the seat had been held by opposition parties in the mid-term of their tenure. Can someone correct this if that is wrong.
 
Joined
25 Jan 2016
Messages
556
Location
Wolverhampton
I am not sure of what I heard on the radio, but did someone actually say that in the last 50 years, a power in power had only won three by-elections in the mid-term of their tenure. Can someone correct this if that is wrong.

I believe so - Mitcham and Morden in 1982, Copeland in 2017 and Hartlepool 8 weeks ago.

Hows that for a pub quiz question?
 

NorthOxonian

Established Member
Associate Staff
Buses & Coaches
Joined
5 Jul 2018
Messages
1,670
Location
Oxford/Newcastle
I am not sure of what I heard on the radio, but did someone actually say that in the last 50 years, a power in power had only won three by-elections in the mid-term of their tenure. Can someone correct this if that is wrong.
That's true - it's only happened five* times since the war. One of those five, rather appropriately, was in a constituency called Brighouse and Spenborough - much of which is now part of Batley and Spen.

* six if you include a very contested by-election in Bristol South East in 1961 - Tony Benn won the most votes as a Labour candidate but was disqualified so the Conservative party gained the seat while in power.
 

37424

Member
Joined
10 Apr 2020
Messages
1,064
Location
Leeds
When a Tory party worker came around belatedly last night I gave him a list of reasons why I switched my vote from Tory to Labour, but the biggest reason is I think the country needs a sensible alternative to the Tories not Corbyn Mk2, so I am pleased Kim won and somewhat disappointed to see how many votes Galloway got but not entirely surprised.
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
10,106
Location
Wilmslow
He went immediately to a live-stream to confirm he will take the result to Electoral Court, labelling it a "banana republic" result and blaming the Returning Officer for refusing a recount.

I haven't had reason to check ROTPA for a while, but even I know that a Returning Officer can refuse a recount from a third-party candidate.
You didn't say, but I don't think that my guess that you're talking about George Galloway is likely to be wrong here ....
 

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,459
Location
The North
The margin of the Labour win is a misleading factor here. This is a good result for Labour, but worse for the Tories. The Workers party acheived 20% of the vote share, but the question is where that came from and which party could potentially benefit from winning those votes next time around.

The 12% vote share for the Brexit Party in 2019 will have mostly gone to the Workers Party, but these voters are not attracted by the Tories. The decrease in the Labour vote will likely be represented by the left wing of the party who are attracted to Galloway but were not attracted by Farage. Therefore what this represents is a 20% share of the electorate in Batley & Spen that Labour can grasp as an opportunity, but those they don’t win won’t go to the Tories either.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,916
Location
Fenny Stratford
The Tories clearly hoped Galloway would win them the seat. He nearly did by running a disgustingly divisive and extremely personal campaign.

What kind of people please extrapolate.

Any of the media coverage of the campaign will evidence who Galloway was pitching at. His campaign was designed to attract the less tolerant, less integrated and/or extreme members of the Islamic community and ensure Labour lost. Of course, he also attracts the clown town Corbyn fanboy SWP types who want Labour to lose and instead be a forum for silly student politics and Palestine love ins.
 
Last edited:

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,459
Location
The North
The Tories clearly hoped Galloway would win them the seat. He nearly did by running a disgustingly divisive and extremely personal campaign.
Yes he nearly did win it for the Tories, but the votes he won aren’t votes that will go to the Tories either. They are votes that Labour can look upon as an opportunity to attract and the job of Labour now is to figure out how to win those people over again. A difficult but not impossible task.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,937
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
The Tories clearly hoped Galloway would win them the seat. He nearly did by running a disgustingly divisive and extremely personal campaign.



Any of the media coverage of the campaign will evidence who Galloway was pitching at. His campaign was designed to attract the less tolerant, less integrated and/or extreme members of the Islamic community and ensure Labour lost. Of course, he also attracts the clown town Corbyn fanboy SWP types who want Labour to lose and instead be a forum for silly student politics and Palestine love ins.
Absolutely this.

Galloway is a political opportunist who, whilst having a long term adherence to pro-Palestine views, has stoked up the division around LGBT teaching etc. That will have turned the heads of some Muslim voters but also those who are against the "centrists" in the Labour Party who don't follow the Corbyn agenda of socialist purity.

I've said before that the Labour Party need to focus on what people want in their everyday lives, and the selection of a local candidate (with the special circumstances given what happened to her sister) is testimony to that. Labour need to get away from Palestine/Israel and Transphobia (not wishing to denigrate anyone's views on those) because, quite simply, whilst people might be discussing that in the artisan coffee shops of Stoke Newington and Islington, they aren't doing so in the cafes of Batley, Burnley or Bishop Auckland.
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,469
Location
Taunton or Kent
Galloway’s disgusting, backward, homophobic campaign saw him net 22% of the vote. There will be absolutely no discussion in the mainstream political agenda as to whether this is a problem because of the kind of people who voted for him.
The problem is that 22% as you state is not just a small percentage total of the vote. not just a small number of people who appear to hold such views.
The Tories clearly hoped Galloway would win them the seat. He nearly did by running a disgustingly divisive and extremely personal campaign.



Any of the media coverage of the campaign will evidence who Galloway was pitching at. His campaign was designed to attract the less tolerant, less integrated and/or extreme members of the Islamic community and ensure Labour lost. Of course, he also attracts the clown town Corbyn fanboy SWP types who want Labour to lose and instead be a forum for silly student politics and Palestine love ins.
Galloway's vote share suggests he was winning more than just previous Labour voters, I somehow don't think Labour would have got 57% of the vote had Galloway not been there at all. The Tory share, while down less than Labour's, was also down 1.7% as well.
 

Typhoon

Established Member
Joined
2 Nov 2017
Messages
3,540
Location
Kent
A good local MP will start that process. The people of Batley seem to have elected a good un so there is plenty of hope.
That seems to be absolutely right, I've just seen an interview with her she came across as just so genuine. I was particularly pleased with the way she spoke about the Conservative and LibDem campaigns (and did not name Galloway). She strikes me as someone who would fight (and fight) for a good cause.

I've said before that the Labour Party need to focus on what people want in their everyday lives, and the selection of a local candidate (with the special circumstances given what happened to her sister) is testimony to that. Labour need to get away from Palestine/Israel and Transphobia (not wishing to denigrate anyone's views on those) because, quite simply, whilst people might be discussing that in the artisan coffee shops of Stoke Newington and Islington, they aren't doing so in the cafes of Batley, Burnley or Bishop Auckland.

I am pleased that this is what she said her first priorities are. She now has to deliver. The good news for her is that the summer recess can't be far away, she will have quite a few weeks when she won't be required to attend the House, so the opportunity to show the voters that they made the right decision.
 

TravelDream

Member
Joined
7 Aug 2016
Messages
1,162
The winners from the by-election: Leadbetter, Starmer, Labour centrists, everyone of us given Galloway's divisive camapign.

Neither won/ lost: The Conservative party.

The losers: The Labour left/ anti-Starmerites, the idea than Boris Johnson is an unbeatable machine.

The Tories clearly hoped Galloway would win them the seat. He nearly did by running a disgustingly divisive and extremely personal campaign.

They obviously didn't.

Their hope was that Galloway would split the Labour vote allowing them to move through the middle. Galloway did split their vote and got a lot more votes than many predicted. However, it wasn't enough for him or the Conservative party.
From reading a few people I would trust online, it appears Labour did better in traditional Tory areas than 2019. Perhaps they were disgusted at Galloway's campaign or perhaps they are starting the slow journey of coming back to Labour.

A by-election win would also cement the narrative that Johnson is unbeatable in the so-called red wall.
 

37424

Member
Joined
10 Apr 2020
Messages
1,064
Location
Leeds
The Tories and the right wing press seem to be trying to blame Matt Hancock, I guess he's a good scape goat but I think they are deluding themselves with that in the same way the Labour left just blamed Brexit and not the Leader or the polices for the 2019 election defeat.

I see Abbott has been spouting about not abandoning 2019 policies she really needs to push off and join her friend as an independent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top