• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Thameslink Services/Timetable from May 20th 2018

Status
Not open for further replies.

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,948
Location
Ely
Still can’t rely on late night services though - currently killing time at CBG as the 2338 to Ely is cancelled - no driver, surprise surprise. Another half hour of my life I’ll never get back.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

MML

Member
Joined
25 Oct 2015
Messages
592
Gonna be an entertaining rush hour. Train blocking southbound services through the Core. Currently stuck behind it at Kentish Town. Northbound services uninterrupted.
Driver making lots of announcements, I just wish I could understand what he was saying amongst the crackle and fading sound.
 

Downthelane

Member
Joined
11 Jan 2016
Messages
174
And we are now in September and the relief driver situation strikes again at Finsbury Park. 08.08 Horsham service blocking down fast and will be sat here for another ten minutes at least.

Oh and it's Pancras....
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,758
Location
Central Belt
Peterborough- Horsham doing badly this morning. Wonder how long it will take to recover. Reactionary delays to other GN services as one would expect. Going to walk from kings cross. Probably quicker.
 

philjo

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2009
Messages
3,014
My 0713 to Cambridge was cancelled as it had terminated at East Croydon due to the problems in the core.
the 0725 stopper was busy as the previous 0649 had also been cancelled.
 

Kanrakuq

Member
Joined
21 May 2018
Messages
77
Peterborough- Horsham doing badly this morning. Wonder how long it will take to recover. Reactionary delays to other GN services as one would expect. Going to walk from kings cross. Probably quicker.

National Rail disruption page currently says it'll all be sorted by 11:00 (i.e. in 80 minutes). Err, nope.

City Thameslink arrivals board is carnage.

upload_2018-9-4_9-54-23.png
 
Last edited:

neilm

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2012
Messages
501
Disruption until 17:00, but let's face it, the service is stuffed until the end of the day. Shocking service and information this morning. Seems that lack of drivers (in correct locations?) was a real issue this morning, as the broken down train was southbound, services were stuck at Blackfriars and London Bridge in the morning Northbound which means the whole service has fallen apart. Seems crazy that they still do driver changes in the core.
 

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,451
I’ve certainly noticed revenue staff back with a vengeance in the last couple of weeks. Loads of checks last week including twice on one journey on one day.

The service has settled down, although certainly not to a point where it’s fully stable. Cancellations are still happening, but the worst thing is late running from the core especially on the Peterborough service. It really is a lottery whether the service will arrive on time or 20 late. The Cambridge/Brighton isn’t much better, when it runs, although it does currently have a luxurious turnaround time in Brighton which presumably won’t be the case if it goes 2tph. The solution to all this stares us all in the face, how long before the penny drops with Thameslink Programme?
What solution is that? More drivers being trained?
 

387star

On Moderation
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
6,665
More GN than TL but why don't 387 inter unit doors open up given there are short stations?

What if someone is in the wrong portion?

Least the coach number is displayed
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,864
Location
UK
Another reason for opening the unit gangway doors is for toilet access. On my train from Cambridge to London the rear unit that coupled up had no working toilets (at King's Cross I could see the front unit was fine) and it went back out to Cambridge or King's Lynn 15 minutes or so later. Anyone in the front would have no toilets.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,248
More GN than TL but why don't 387 inter unit doors open up given there are short stations?
I don’t think it was ever satisfactorily answered. 387s and many other Electrostars operate with gangways in use elsewhere, and on routes where splitting and joining is routine. I assume GWR have them open, I’ve not been on one for ages.
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,758
Location
Central Belt
I don’t think it was ever satisfactorily answered. 387s and many other Electrostars operate with gangways in use elsewhere, and on routes where splitting and joining is routine. I assume GWR have them open, I’ve not been on one for ages.

I got a reply from a great northern manager. First then claimed they door said were unsafe. When i challenged them about why identical trains were used on the same franchise, putting passengers lives at risk if that was the case. They responded that staff at Cambridge were not employed by them therefore could not be held accountable for opening them. Very poor state of affairs but makes sense. Cambridge is greater Anglia. Hopefully when we get rid of GTR this will be resolved, as passenger comfort is of no interest to GTR.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
I got a reply from a great northern manager. First then claimed they door said were unsafe. When i challenged them about why identical trains were used on the same franchise, putting passengers lives at risk if that was the case. They responded that staff at Cambridge were not employed by them therefore could not be held accountable for opening them. Very poor state of affairs but makes sense. Cambridge is greater Anglia. Hopefully when we get rid of GTR this will be resolved, as passenger comfort is of no interest to GTR.

GA staff do *not* open the internal doors on the peak services that split/join betweem King's Lynn and Liverpool Street, between the attaching portions.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,668
Disruption until 17:00, but let's face it, the service is stuffed until the end of the day.

Coincidentally, the service was fully recovered, or perhaps ‘unstuffed’, almost exactly at the time of your post. Certainly the evening peak ran very well.
 
Last edited:

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,758
Location
Central Belt
Coincidentally, the service was fully recovered, or perhaps ‘unstuffed’, almost exactly a time the time of your post. Certainly the evening peak ran very well.

Still a few Horsham to Peterborough cancelled throughout. 1724 ex Finsbury Park one of them.
 

whoosh

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2008
Messages
1,884
387s.

Unsafe to have gangway doors opened - rubbish. This WAS the case with class 317s though, as two split in service and the opening up of their gangways was discontinued afterwards. I expect confusion has occurred with this event.
It's a different type of coupler on the two classes.

The splitting and attaching of Class 387s takes longer when gangway doors and cab doors need opening up. Not by much, but it would either need more time adding in the timetable, or an additional driver to assist. The additional driver option was what they went with in the last timetable, and this worked well. HOWEVER, tying up a driver with assisting attachments/detachments all day when you haven't got enough Drivers to run a service with your new timetable isn't a good use of resources.

Result = Unsatisfactory non-opening of gangways. Especially unsatisfactory on any 387 train longer than 4 cars that is booked to call at Foxton, Shepreth, and Meldreth.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,936
Location
Airedale
I thought it was just Saver and SuperSaver tickets where BOJ was prohibited? I don’t remember it being prohibited on CDRs, although I could be misremembering. Vary rarely enforced of course...
You are pretty much correct.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,864
Location
UK
I am sure the 387 gangway issue is down to GA staff not being willing to open them and it being a time issue for a driver to do so. There were initially issues with some GA staff shutting down 700s because they insisted they were not allow to enter the cab of a train.

I don't think GTR can be blamed for this one although the excuse was lame. Maybe trying not to blame another TOC they rely on?

Incidentally I've heard rumours GTR may not dispatch trains at King's Cross in the future with all platforms done by LNER staff? Is that remotely true?
 

Surreytraveller

On Moderation
Joined
21 Oct 2009
Messages
3,905
I got a reply from a great northern manager. First then claimed they door said were unsafe. When i challenged them about why identical trains were used on the same franchise, putting passengers lives at risk if that was the case. They responded that staff at Cambridge were not employed by them therefore could not be held accountable for opening them. Very poor state of affairs but makes sense. Cambridge is greater Anglia. Hopefully when we get rid of GTR this will be resolved, as passenger comfort is of no interest to GTR.
That's rubbish. Tonbridge are employed by Southeastern and will do the doors of Southern trains
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,758
Location
Central Belt
That's rubbish. Tonbridge are employed by Southeastern and will do the doors of Southern trains

Maybe. I find GTR never really look for solutions to problems. But both southern and south eastern are the same parent groups, so maybe they will work together. Greater Anglia don’t do it for there own services so are unlikely to do for someone else’s. I guess they could deploy their own staff at Cambridge but this is unlikely as GTR get no benefit to having the doors open, even if the passengers do.
 

Agent_Squash

Established Member
Joined
22 Jul 2016
Messages
1,271
Maybe. I find GTR never really look for solutions to problems. But both southern and south eastern are the same parent groups, so maybe they will work together. Greater Anglia don’t do it for there own services so are unlikely to do for someone else’s. I guess they could deploy their own staff at Cambridge but this is unlikely as GTR get no benefit to having the doors open, even if the passengers do.

Southern was always much better as it's own (separate) franchise - but it seems the general lack of focus under GTR degrades the service for all.
 

MML

Member
Joined
25 Oct 2015
Messages
592
Gonna be an entertaining rush hour. Train blocking southbound services through the Core. Currently stuck behind it at Kentish Town. Northbound services uninterrupted.
Driver making lots of announcements, I just wish I could understand what he was saying amongst the crackle and fading sound.
I feel like I've been here before just facing the opposite direction.
Northbound services now at a standstill due to an operational incident at St Pancras. What a marvellous idea having 2 tracks for peak hour services across London. I hope the good folks of Peterborough aren't expecting to see a train anytime soon.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
20,347
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
I am sure the 387 gangway issue is down to GA staff not being willing to open them and it being a time issue for a driver to do so. There were initially issues with some GA staff shutting down 700s because they insisted they were not allow to enter the cab of a train.

I don't think GTR can be blamed for this one although the excuse was lame. Maybe trying not to blame another TOC they rely on?

Incidentally I've heard rumours GTR may not dispatch trains at King's Cross in the future with all platforms done by LNER staff? Is that remotely true?

On the latter point, I hope not. The old-school dispatch staff there date back to WAGN days in some cases, and really know what they’re doing. Although I noticed what look like agency staff there recently.

(On a personal note I get on well with one or two of them, and have many a time had trains opened up at 0500 in the morning rather than having to stand around!).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top