• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Thameslink/ Class 700 Progress

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sparks807Evo

Member
Joined
22 Aug 2010
Messages
461
Completely pointless exercise; very little difference to the current logo and severely doubt most customers care what the logo is. Thought the current one served its purpose; not the most inspiring livery ever but at least the logo added a bit of colour to it and was distinguishable from the mass of glossy grey. Think Govia need to sort out priorities if that is their main concern at the minute considering the ever growing discontent out of London Bridge etc.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
Is changing Thameslink to ThamesLink/ really going to change anything?

What next, Great Northern becomes GreatNorthern/ or, to be edgy, maybe GreatNorthern\ ?

Seriously - I don't actually understand why it can even be considered anything more than a late logo change, that will cost the company money by having to reproduce posters/signs and other material (ID badges, internal forms etc).
It seems to me they are trying to revive the old Thameslink brand from their first attempt at running the services, which was absolutely, wholeheartedly ****ing abysmal. How quickly people forgot how bad it was and began bashing First. Bet now they have some perspective.
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
When are the first 377s heading to the gn side ?

As soon as the 700s come into service, so soon.

Presumably though no 377s will actually move until enough 700s are reliably in operation on the current TL side? And have the 377s been on testing runs up the GN routes?

377s have been operating from Hornsey to Kings Cross for years as ECS. Not quite sure what the latest clearance is but believe they should be fairly route cleared now as they are a known/proven stock compared to the 700s.

I'd have thought that the GN Thameslink services will simply be branded "Thameslink" whilst the Cambridge Express will be "Great Northern". But then christ knows which brand the Peterborough peak-hour extras will use!

any thing that runs throught the core will be Thameslink. Anything that doesnt will be GN.

Peak trains from KX will be 365s or 377s so will be GN.

Quite looking forward to seeing a 377 in Grey/white livery with the blue doors to be honest. Think it'll look smart on them.

Don't quite get the big issue understanding this. All Thameslink services will be branded as such. Its no different from being at Gatwick Airport and having three GTR brands serving the station.

On GN you will have Thameslink trains via St Pancras and GN branded services to Kings Cross or Moorgate. Fairly simple really.

The only question is will if TfL takes a leadership role in the Moorgate lines will they want them branded seperately or as part of LO. No-one will know this for several years and is thread drift however.

But that is not what GTR are saying now are they with this "new Thameslink" brand are they?

The new Thameslink brand is currently operated by GTR but will outlast them. Just like Scotrail, GWR, Northern, TPE, its a brand that a new operator is bringing in on behalf of DfT (others as well with some franchises or in Scotrail's case the Scottish government). The idea is to save all that money wasted as each franchise comes in and plastered its design and keep that for useful things. The savings are huge across the entire industry and ensures that the money generated by the railway issued better. After all no passenger cares what colour their train is, just its clean, chance of a seat and that they run on time.

Is changing Thameslink to ThamesLink/ really going to change anything?

What next, Great Northern becomes GreatNorthern/ or, to be edgy, maybe GreatNorthern\ ?

Seriously - I don't actually understand why it can even be considered anything more than a late logo change, that will cost the company money by having to reproduce posters/signs and other material (ID badges, internal forms etc).

Because GTR is contracted out to make strong brands by the DfT. The idea is these brands will then stay and form the next franchise. What's not decided if if these brands will stick together or be separate entities post 2021.

Let's not forget that they had to remove the FCC branding (for money reasons as well as First unlikely want to have its name plastered on something it doesn't control). This allowed time for a stronger brand to be developed.

It seems forgotten on here everything GTR does has to be cleared with the DfT so any changes, especially things like rebranding, will be taken by them and will only happen if GTR can sell the idea as part of their contract.

As for suggestions of replacing things, actually that's not the plan. Its all designed to be done as and when replacements are required, not before. So a natural cycle of replacement for the brand. The only major difference is the trains themselves.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,837
Location
UK
Surely FCC had to pay to remove its branding, as part of its own contract?

From winning the contract to actually running it, there was time to come up with the branding and the decision was made to go with a similar banner with different text. And then there was the screw up with the websites and domains, and the fact that it's just one site for both routes.

Now they're trying to create unique branding (I still don't get it - they've just changed the logo, so big deal) so I assume they'll split the websites for ThamesLink and Great Northern now?

I get there might be a split of the routes in the future, but for now the customer will see the trains with a slightly different Thameslink logo. Many won't even notice, any more than when any other company changes a logo.
 

cjmillsnun

Established Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
3,275
slightly off topic...

Southern still seems to think that it is a separate company to GTR...
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 13.10.09.png
    Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 13.10.09.png
    27.6 KB · Views: 166
  • Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 13.10.58.png
    Screen Shot 2016-04-10 at 13.10.58.png
    25.5 KB · Views: 151

ScotGG

Established Member
Joined
3 Apr 2013
Messages
1,585
Anyone know the issue that's just arisen with the 700s that has put a temporary halt on 387s moving to FGW?
 

physics34

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
4,080
The new Thameslink brand is currently operated by GTR but will outlast them. Just like Scotrail, GWR, Northern, TPE, its a brand that a new operator is bringing in on behalf of DfT (others as well with some franchises or in Scotrail's case the Scottish government). The idea is to save all that money wasted as each franchise comes in and plastered its design and keep that for useful things. The savings are huge across the entire industry and ensures that the money generated by the railway issued better. After all no passenger cares what colour their train is, just its clean, chance of a seat and that they run on time.



Because GTR is contracted out to make strong brands by the DfT. The idea is these brands will then stay and form the next franchise. What's not decided if if these brands will stick together or be separate entities post 2021.

Let's not forget that they had to remove the FCC branding (for money reasons as well as First unlikely want to have its name plastered on something it doesn't control). This allowed time for a stronger brand to be developed.

It seems forgotten on here everything GTR does has to be cleared with the DfT so any changes, especially things like rebranding, will be taken by them and will only happen if GTR can sell the idea as part of their contract.

As for suggestions of replacing things, actually that's not the plan. Its all designed to be done as and when replacements are required, not before. So a natural cycle of replacement for the brand. The only major difference is the trains themselves.

Hence my belief that all stock should have the same/similar livery, maybe only different by sector...pretty much like they were split before...RR, NSE and IC, with just the companies branding being different. I'd even bring the BR logo back, although I don't agree with renationalisation

It's probably better than it was a few years ago, but as a result of all the new indentites over the years you have a situation like on the Anglia region which was a total mess livery-wise.
 
Last edited:

FOH

Member
Joined
17 Oct 2013
Messages
766
Anyone know the issue that's just arisen with the 700s that has put a temporary halt on 387s moving to FGW?

I haven't got a copy to quote but i believe the last Modern Railways listed something like 8 independent faults that were preventing service entry.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,583
Seemed to be working fine when I saw one at Blackfriars today. First time I've seen one moving, very impressive.
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
That looks fine to me (apart from the blurred photo of course), but given the fairly specific legislation on things like the colour of PIS on board trains, are there any rules stating how large the font should be on signage like this?
 
Joined
17 Jun 2012
Messages
37
any thing that runs throught the core will be Thameslink. Anything that doesnt will be GN.

Peak trains from KX will be 365s or 377s so will be GN.

Quite looking forward to seeing a 377 in Grey/white livery with the blue doors to be honest. Think it'll look smart on them.

that's only if GN can be bothered to relivery them, which I highly doubt knowing them!
 

LLivery

Established Member
Joined
13 Jul 2014
Messages
1,707
Location
Southeastern land

I saw them last week, they are much better than before. Anyone know if they will be installed just in the Thameslink core or further afield on the GTR network?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Now they're trying to create unique branding (I still don't get it - they've just changed the logo, so big deal) so I assume they'll split the websites for ThamesLink and Great Northern now?

I get there might be a split of the routes in the future, but for now the customer will see the trains with a slightly different Thameslink logo. Many won't even notice, any more than when any other company changes a logo.

According to their twitter, they are making a new website for Thameslink. If I remember correctly its not coming into use until early Autumn.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Problem with this logo is that it is not iconic. GWR, ScotRail, TfL all have logos which are recognisable but ThamesLink/ is just a poor attempt.
 

Emblematic

Member
Joined
14 Aug 2013
Messages
659
That looks fine to me (apart from the blurred photo of course), but given the fairly specific legislation on things like the colour of PIS on board trains, are there any rules stating how large the font should be on signage like this?

Well of course there is! :) The 2nd PRM TSI

5.3. List and characteristics of constituents
The interoperability constituents are covered by the relevant provisions of Directive 2008/57/EC and are
listed below.
5.3.1. Infrastructure
The following items are identified as being interoperability constituents for infrastructure:
5.3.1.1. Displays
(1) Displays shall be sized to show individual station names or words of messages. Each station name, or
words of messages, shall be displayed for a minimum of 2 seconds.
(2) If a scrolling display is used (either horizontal or vertical), each complete word shall be displayed for a
minimum of 2 seconds and the horizontal scrolling speed shall not exceed 6 characters per second.
(3) Displays shall be designed and assessed for an area of use defined by the maximum viewing distance
according to the following formula:
Reading distance in mm divided by 250 = font size (for example: 10 000 mm/250 = 40 mm).
Plus a whole load of stuff applicable to all signage, like good contrast, clear fonts etc. So that's all clear then ;)
 

Emblematic

Member
Joined
14 Aug 2013
Messages
659
Actually the UK code of practice specifies fonts at least 2.5 times larger than the PRM TSI. 10mm at 1m, 20mm at 2m and so forth. The bottom of the display is around 3m above platform level, so obviously intended to be viewed from distance. I think they've stuffed this up!
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
Interesting - yes that probably doesn't meet those regulations (although I would argue very few stations would - the orange dot matrix signs used seemingly everywhere these days are very clear up close, but are usually so sparse that at the opposite end of the platform it's impossible to read them, and I like to think I have fairly good eyesight. Where is the line drawn on display spacing? (Also, FWIW I think Southern's 455 displays would probably fail that 6 character per second ruling too, they're hard to keep up with!)

</offtopic> to echo earlier posts, while I'm aware of the 387 cascade delay, does this correspond to a proportionate delay in the introduction of 700s, or is it just the 387 move that is late?
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,837
Location
UK
This is getting off topic, but with regards to the new TL brand, it looks really silly on their Twitter avatar/logo. T/ - yeah, that's smart. :roll:

Screen Shot 2016-04-13 at 23.11.54.jpg

It looks odd when the logo says ThamesLink but all references are still to Thameslink in the text on the site. Will someone be doing a search and replace for every use of the word to change to an upper case L?

Screen Shot 2016-04-13 at 23.11.42.jpg

Perhaps the / should have been in BR red and at a sharper angle, then all other franchises would get a / \ or _ and one day they'd all magically merge together to form the BR logo...
 

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
This is getting off topic, but with regards to the new TL brand, it looks really silly on their Twitter avatar/logo. T/ - yeah, that's smart. :roll:

View attachment 26324

It looks odd when the logo says ThamesLink but all references are still to Thameslink in the text on the site. Will someone be doing a search and replace for every use of the word to change to an upper case L?

View attachment 26323

Perhaps the / should have been in BR red and at a sharper angle, then all other franchises would get a / \ or _ and one day they'd all magically merge together to form the BR logo...
I'm pretty sure it's supposed to read Thameslink Slash. As in "going to take a slash". Cos **** pretty much sums up Govia
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,837
Location
UK
I thought the current logo was fine and don't believe this one will survive future changes in management of the route.

Sent from my EVA-L09 using Tapatalk
 

MikePJ

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2015
Messages
1,002
I saw them last week, they are much better than before. Anyone know if they will be installed just in the Thameslink core or further afield on the GTR network?

I was at Infrarail on Tuesday - Nick Gray from Network Rail (he's "principal programme sponsor for the Thameslink Programme") mentioned them briefly. He said the St Pancras installation is a first test of installing the hardware, but they're running an interim version of the software - the design and layout of the text (and possibly also the type of information provided) will be updated later. He did say that they have done a lot of studies into the readability of the displays so that passengers find their train easily.

He said that these displays would be at all the Core stations, but he didn't say anything about stations beyond that.
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
I was at Infrarail on Tuesday - Nick Gray from Network Rail (he's "principal programme sponsor for the Thameslink Programme") mentioned them briefly. He said the St Pancras installation is a first test of installing the hardware, but they're running an interim version of the software - the design and layout of the text (and possibly also the type of information provided) will be updated later. He did say that they have done a lot of studies into the readability of the displays so that passengers find their train easily.

He said that these displays would be at all the Core stations, but he didn't say anything about stations beyond that.

They are only for Core stations. Previous ones were only installed in those stations anyway.
 

southern442

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2013
Messages
2,265
Location
Surrey
I think the new screens look quite good, but they are a bit on the small side compared with the older ones.
 

JaJaWa

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2013
Messages
1,730
Location
They replaced all the ones in the core with the blue ones before... Seems like they were a fairly expensive mistake.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top