• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Thameslink/ Class 700 Progress

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
13,124
That might be so on an empty train. It certainly won't be true when they enter service and there is, for example, a screaming baby in the adjacent carriage. Needless to say, on a 377 or 365 you wouldn't hear the noise with the doors closed.

I travelled on trains throughout Europe with such an arrangement and it makes no difference to sound levels at all. The division between coaches acts as a natural sound barrier anyway.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
20,315
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
I travelled on trains throughout Europe with such an arrangement and it makes no difference to sound levels at all. The division between coaches acts as a natural sound barrier anyway.

Unfortunately, experience on the class 378s demonstrates otherwise. I fail to see how an open connection can provide *any* sort of sound barrier, natural or otherwise.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
13,124
Unfortunately, experience on the class 378s demonstrates otherwise. I fail to see how an open connection can provide *any* sort of sound barrier, natural or otherwise.

Well it must be my hearing then. Either that or the fact I wasn't referring to 378s.
 

stut

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2008
Messages
1,924
In fairness, the difference could be because people in London LIKE TO SHOUT THEIR CONVERSATIONS much more than anywhere else I've been in Europe (well, maybe not Russia). And that's before we even start on the "my little smasher is bored, and the only possible way to entertain him is an iPad with the sound turned up full and no headphones".
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,844
Location
UK
When you have a busy train with open gangways, the general ambient noise makes it quite easy for a baby crying bit to stand out too much unless you're very nearby.

Now if everyone sits and stands in perfect silence and the train stops moving, and the air con is off, then yes it might be annoying.

I am sure it's not going to be a big deal.
 

stut

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2008
Messages
1,924
True. I'm more concerned about the seat width, personally.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
16,018
Location
St Albans
True. I'm more concerned about the seat width, personally.

I'm more concerned (roughly in this order) that the train will:
arrive on time (i.e. not break down/get cancelled)
have enough room to get on past those who love to obstruct the doors, safely
have enough room to sit/stand (according to the time of day) in safety with room for my feet
be of a temperature appropriate for the outside weather
be properly ventilated
be as quiet in use as modern EMU stock, e.g. Electrostars/Desiros
have a correctly working PIS​

then I might consider all of the 'nice to haves' like adjacent windows, tables, wi-fi, even power outlets, but I wouldn't give up any of the above list for the frippery just mentioned.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
8,236
I'm more concerned (roughly in this order) that the train will:
arrive on time (i.e. not break down/get cancelled)
have enough room to get on past those who love to obstruct the doors, safely
have enough room to sit/stand (according to the time of day) in safety with room for my feet
be of a temperature appropriate for the outside weather
be properly ventilated
be as quiet in use as modern EMU stock, e.g. Electrostars/Desiros
have a correctly working PIS​

then I might consider all of the 'nice to haves' like adjacent windows, tables, wi-fi, even power outlets, but I wouldn't give up any of the above list for the frippery just mentioned.

The most sensible post on this thread/subject for quite a while...
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
20,315
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
I'm more concerned (roughly in this order) that the train will:
arrive on time (i.e. not break down/get cancelled)
have enough room to get on past those who love to obstruct the doors, safely
have enough room to sit/stand (according to the time of day) in safety with room for my feet
be of a temperature appropriate for the outside weather
be properly ventilated
be as quiet in use as modern EMU stock, e.g. Electrostars/Desiros
have a correctly working PIS​

then I might consider all of the 'nice to haves' like adjacent windows, tables, wi-fi, even power outlets, but I wouldn't give up any of the above list for the frippery just mentioned.

Note sure what relevance this has, on the GN side the existing trains meet all these requirements quite satisfactorily - except (occasionally) the last. Likewise, a class 377/5, for example, would also more than fit the bill. What on your list did I suggest giving up?

When the 700s come, I'm quite sure users will find the downgrade unacceptable, compared to their existing trains -- especially as it appears some locations (e.g. Welwyn Garden City?) won't be benefiting from the 12-car trains.

The standing capacity might be welcome on the existing Thameslink route, on the GN side mass amounts of standing on the outer-suburban services is not normally common -- and this is on what is largely an 8-car railway.
 
Last edited:

physics34

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
4,082
I'm more concerned (roughly in this order) that the train will:
arrive on time (i.e. not break down/get cancelled)
have enough room to get on past those who love to obstruct the doors, safely
have enough room to sit/stand (according to the time of day) in safety with room for my feet
be of a temperature appropriate for the outside weather
be properly ventilated
be as quiet in use as modern EMU stock, e.g. Electrostars/Desiros
have a correctly working PIS​

then I might consider all of the 'nice to haves' like adjacent windows, tables, wi-fi, even power outlets, but I wouldn't give up any of the above list for the frippery just mentioned.


we have been through this several times i know, that I believe if you pay £5k and upwards for your ticket and your journey is for over an hour I consider tables a NEED to have, especially as a place to "put your coffee". A table is a pretty basic requirement. You could now argue in this modern world and you want us to move forward with the times that wifi is now a NEED to have.

I would consider power outlets a "nice to have" although if metro 377s have them then surely they become a NEED to have.

Seats lining up with windows is not a requirement for metro or suburban stock or even semi-long distance services, but you would expect them for intercity type journeys and this is an argument against Pendolinos and voyagers.

Once again though im agreeing with you on the point that open gangways are fine for the 700s....... its just that old chestnut as to whether that the 700s themselves are suitable for longer distance journeys i.e Littlehampton/Brighton
 
Last edited:

Philip Phlopp

Established Member
Joined
31 May 2015
Messages
3,003
Will the juice rail be able to handle the power draw of 2 700s coupled together?

There are people paid to ask themselves these questions, but they are seated next to the specifications of the switchgear for each route and can answer definitively.

If it's going ahead, the answer in some form is Yes. Performance may be degraded or other units kept out of the same electrical section.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,157
Will the juice rail be able to handle the power draw of 2 700s coupled together?

That's the first time I've ever heard 'juice rail' - and I sincerely hope it is the last.

Obviously the electrical engineers will have considered it, but it will usually only been one 700 drawing power (bearing in mind they will only couple for recovery movements), and not at full service speed.
 

LBSCR Times

Member
Joined
17 Sep 2013
Messages
617
Location
Sussex born and bred
As in they are running two twelve-cars separately or as one unit? If its one unit then that would be a joy to behold!

Both together on one train unless they have to split them.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
That's the first time I've ever heard 'juice rail' - and I sincerely hope it is the last.

Juice rail or con rail.....
Both are used, but only in face to face conversations, not over the phone!
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
eventually. its an afterthought though :D

Passenger wifi yes.

24 car test trip tonight to Leagrave, and return!

Last night 24 car DC testing. All went well.

Will the juice rail be able to handle the power draw of 2 700s coupled together?

Units automatically restrict themselves.

2x700/1s coupled together.
Will be interesting to see where they will do the power-change.

In the Core ;)
 

Julian G

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2005
Messages
3,553
Passenger wifi yes.



Last night 24 car DC testing. All went well.



Units automatically restrict themselves.



In the Core ;)
Between City Thameslink and Farringdon if they are planning to raise the pans up on both units?
 

A-driver

Established Member
Joined
9 May 2011
Messages
4,482
That's the first time I've ever heard 'juice rail' - and I sincerely hope it is the last.



Obviously the electrical engineers will have considered it, but it will usually only been one 700 drawing power (bearing in mind they will only couple for recovery movements), and not at full service speed.


Juice rail is a very common term used on 3rd rail lines. Many DMs and trainers on the GN use the term 'juice rail' including one of the trainers who does (or rather did as it dosnt run anymore) the FEP train at Moorgate.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
16,018
Location
St Albans
we have been through this several times i know, that I believe if you pay £5k and upwards for your ticket and your journey is for over an hour I consider tables a NEED to have, especially as a place to "put your coffee".

The £5K is irrelevant. In fact for Brighton to London Terminals it is £4408. For that you get anytime travel on 240 peak-hour return journeys of 102 miles, that's about 18p per mile. It's about 40% of an anytime ticket and almost as cheap as an off-peak ticket without all its restrictions. Sounds like a well subsidised journey on services that are the most expensive to provide.

Now back to essentials:
There is no way that a table is a NEED to have however much you would like it. Working toilets would be a need to have (which I accidentally left off the essential list) on journey over say 1 hour, (maybe less than that if you drink too much coffee. :)
Wi-fi is not essential but for some they feel a need for it. The problem is that although relatively easy to provide the hardware, once it is there, then whatever its capacity, (which depends on local reception, that the TOC cannot control) there will be those whose exessive demands will eventually render it less than useful. As many have noted, that well within the life of the class 700s, those passengers who simply must be connected to their internet mother ship will probably make their own provision for reliable 4G (or later generations) of WAN comms.
I can forsee a time, that there could be a cap put on free wi-fi data rates to prevent selfish users denying others basic access. Arguably, if TOCs, bus companies et al continue to increase online information provision at the expense of other means, e.g. verbal, station and train PIS details etc., that a basic wi-fi feed, able to deliver textual information to a full train might be regarded as essential.
 
Joined
24 Mar 2009
Messages
592
The £5K is irrelevant. In fact for Brighton to London Terminals it is £4408. For that you get anytime travel on 240 peak-hour return journeys of 102 miles, that's about 18p per mile. It's about 40% of an anytime ticket and almost as cheap as an off-peak ticket without all its restrictions. Sounds like a well subsidised journey on services that are the most expensive to provide.

I can assure you that my season ticket is already well north of £5k. I don't drink coffee/tea on the train, so I'm not that bothered about tables but I would like a reasonably comfy seat. I'm hoping that the distance between the seats is sufficient so that my knees aren't rubbing on the back of the seat in front.

I've already questioned the specification of these "Wundertrains" in this thread and been shot down in flames so many times I now have to wear asbestos gloves when I type.

As I have no alternative way of getting to and from work, I'm keen to experience the train under actual service conditions. When will the fare-paying public get a chance to enjoy the more comfortable standing experience?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top