• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

SWR "Summer timetable"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,682
This situation has primarily arisen as a result of poor workforce planning and inadequate recruitment - it shouldn't come as a surprise that more traincrew will want to take annual leave during the summer holidays!

I think it would be fairer to say that this has primarily arisen as a result of the various reasons that have delayed the 701 introduction. I’m willing to bet that there were very well developed workforce plans for 701 introduction at various points.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
16,595
Location
UK
I think it would be fairer to say that this has primarily arisen as a result of the various reasons that have delayed the 701 introduction. I’m willing to bet that there were very well developed workforce plans for 701 introduction at various points.
Well they certainly don't appear to have seen much light of day...
 
Joined
5 Jan 2014
Messages
566
The problem with taking out a set number of diagrams as they've done is that it can be very hard to avoid consecutive cancellations. You can start the day with cancelled trains not near each other but then as end to end run times vary the cancellations come together.

Basically it looks like they've done this in the easiest way you can without re-writing all the crew diagrams. This is probably as someone has said up thread due to the workload on the planning department, especially as the whole thing looks like a last minute decision.

Yes it's poor (I'm one of those effected) but I don't think there's any conspiracy around which trains they've chosen.
Thanks for the clarification.
A reasonable mitigation for the latter point would be to allow people to travel on the previous train for the duration of the temporary cuts.
Yes this would have been an acceptable solution.
 

73128

Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
470
Location
Reading
Simply the first stage of nationalisation surely. Run for the employees, not the customers.
 

davews

Member
Joined
24 Apr 2021
Messages
999
Location
Bracknell
SWR site suggesting that the summer timetable runs until August 29th. RTT though is showing the removed diagrams coming back all of next week, at least on the Readings. Which is right?
 

swr444

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2008
Messages
992
Location
London
SWR site suggesting that the summer timetable runs until August 29th. RTT though is showing the removed diagrams coming back all of next week, at least on the Readings. Which is right?
RTT only gets updated weekly for amended timetables, due to the way the short term planning stuff gets uploaded. Should be changed tomorrow or Thursday
 

SWT_USER

Member
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
1,176
Location
Ashford Middx
SWR site suggesting that the summer timetable runs until August 29th. RTT though is showing the removed diagrams coming back all of next week, at least on the Readings. Which is right?
Given the closure between Barnes and Kew Bridge next week there should be some additional resource. It always seems to be much easier to cut services than to reintroduce them though so it may not result in any changes.
 

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,445
Given the closure between Barnes and Kew Bridge next week there should be some additional resource. It always seems to be much easier to cut services than to reintroduce them though so it may not result in any changes.

Whilst I can see why you think that, engineering work diagrams are always less efficient (you need two sets of crews to cover both sides of the block compared to one compliment working a through journey).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top