TheNewNo2
Member
Would it be possible to open up intermediate 'space' using Eastern and Western subways as the boundary walls?
No, because the Docklands Light Railway is between them.
Would it be possible to open up intermediate 'space' using Eastern and Western subways as the boundary walls?
No, because the Docklands Light Railway is between them.
I believe it is.Is the International station used any more? if it isn't is there realistically any way they could make use of it?
Is the International station used any more? if it isn't is there realistically any way they could make use of it?
There was a bit of discussion about doing just that a short while ago, although in the context of the GEML/Central line platforms I'm not sure it would make much difference with the overcrowding at the main Stratford station.SpacePhoenix said:If the Brighton-Ashford route ever were to be fully electrified, would it get enough passenger traffic to justify St Pancras-Brighton using Javelins?
Wait until West Ham have a home match at their new stadium.
Stratford managed multiple Olympic events finishing around the same time and a stadium with 20,000 more seats than it has now.Wait until West Ham have a home match at their new stadium.
Stratford's one of these locations where it's impossible to build the ideal layout as you'd need to shut down the GEML, Central, both DLR branches, Overground and the Lea Valley route all at once for a couple of years... Even then it's hard to work out a truly ideal layout with so many services. It might almost be best if there was an island for each service (GEML Intercity, GEML Outer Suburban, Crossrail, Central Line, Overground, Lea Valley, DLR via Pudding Mill Lane) on the top level, a vast open interchange level below and the Jubilee and DLR to Stratford International underneath the rest of the station, with no cross-platform interchanges at all.
Hell if you were getting rid of Cross Platform, Central Line could be consigned to a lower level. Which would actually help relieve pressure on it.
This is a very long-lived thread!)Wait until West Ham have a home match at their new stadium.
Stratford managed multiple Olympic events finishing around the same time and a stadium with 20,000 more seats than it has now.
The sky didn't fall in then, no reason to think it will now.
It seems to me the real problem is the rather claustrophobic, narrow, (and in my experience, quite confusing) tunnels under the main part of the station. It would've made far more sense to open those tunnels out into a large extension of the concourse. I'm guessing that (a) the only thing stopping this was the cost of excavating out and replacing whatever's between the tunnels with some supporting pillars, and (b) while it would be expensive, that could be done without much disruption to the trains.
Wait until West Ham have a home match at their new stadium.
They had a match at their new stadium last weekend against AFC Bournemouth
Stratford managed multiple Olympic events finishing around the same time and a stadium with 20,000 more seats than it has now.
The sky didn't fall in then, no reason to think it will now.
You would think that, if anything, TfL should have more experience dealing with large passenger flows as they handle around 4.5 million journeys a day across the tube network.The command of the station has changed since then. It was Abellio in 2012 now its TfL.
Just in terms of all the new housing going up/ due to go up round the area is there scope for another station (not one that could serve all lines, obviously) somewhere in relatively close proximity, a bit like Maryland, which, incidentally, will surely see a lot more footfall when Crossrail comes?
Nevertheless, it was a provision of the Crossrail Act that Maryland stays open.
If memory serves correct, not every service stops there.It causes every GE Metro passenger (soon to be Elizabeth line passenger) from east of there to lose 2 minutes each way.
I hadn't realised that. Given that, though, wouldn't it be a good thing if Maryland got some additional usage? Way too long since I knew the area a bit, but mightn't some passengers currently using Leyton to get to the West End possibly divert there instead (those living to the east and southeast of Leyton tube)?
As an aside, the case for closing Maryland is overwhelming. It's half a mile from Stratford, and accordingly has low usage. It causes every GE Metro passenger (soon to be Elizabeth line passenger) from east of there to lose 2 minutes each way. With more than 20 million journeys a year affected, that is a lot of time 'lost', for the benefit of less than a million journeys which (generally) would only take 5-10 minutes longer if they walked to Stratford instead. And if the station wasn't there, the junctions there could be properly laid out (higher speeds all round, and a lower maintenance requirement); also there would be no need for SDO.
Nevertheless, it was a provision of the Crossrail Act that Maryland stays open.
If memory serves correct, not every service stops there.
Edit: Memory doesn't serve correct, I'm thinking of the Sunday timetable.