Are the Great Central stations programmed into the Chiltern units a joke or was there some slim chance of possibility that the route would have been reopened?
It was a serious proposal by the privatised management, M40 Trains, to reopen the line as far as a parkway station in the vicinity of Lutterworth. It is described in the Pen & Sword published "Chiltern Railways - The Inside Story" by Adrian Shooter (published 2022).By the time those units were introduced, some major structures had been demolished, including Brackley viaduct (in 1978). I can't imagine there was ever any possibility of rebuilding those structures even if a need for the line had been accepted.
It's a joke - even if there was a very small chance of some of the route being reopened, there was zero chance of it making it all the way up to Sheffield, and the chances of a 165 making it all the way there unmodified from introduction were even less.Are the Great Central stations programmed into the Chiltern units a joke or was there some slim chance of possibility that the route would have been reopened?
Wow, that was ambitious. I suspect a detailed construction estimate would have sunk the scheme (or possibly it did).It was a serious proposal by the privatised management, M40 Trains, to reopen the line as far as a parkway station in the vicinity of Lutterworth. It is described in the Pen & Sword published "Chiltern Railways - The Inside Story" by Adrian Shooter (published 2022).
Wow, that was ambitious. I suspect a detailed construction estimate would have sunk the scheme (or possibly it did).
In that era both East Midlands Parkway and Luton Airport Parkway were promoted as taking traffic off the M1, the latter certainly had signs to it on the southbound carriageway. I'm not sure how much that came to fruition, but East Midlands at least seems to be rather less busy than originally expected.
It was 158806 which had various European destinations programmed in as part of the PR for the opening of Manchester Airport station.Vaguely remember years ago that you could occasionally see 158 units on long layovers in Edinburgh with nonsense such as Paris Nord or Berlin Hauptbahnhof displayed on the electronic destination screen.
In addition to a selection of currently served stations not normally used as termini for use during engineering works etc, the 158/159 list also includes places such as Bristol Temple Meads, Brockenhurst, Lymington Pier, Paignton, Plymouth and Totton where the SWT/SWR diesel fleet have regularly worked terminating services too in the past.
Further to that, it also includes a selection of off-network stations such as Bristol Parkway, Cheltenham Spa, Chippenham, Exmouth, Gloucester, Great Malvern, Severn Beach, Swindon, Taunton, Weston-super-Mare and Worcester Shrub Hill. These saw use during the periods where SWT were regularly hiring units to GWR.
I wonder if even minor, minor ones such as Springfield and Balmossie are included.LNER also have Stanford Le Hope (a stop on the C2C network) announcements recorded. I believe this was a mistake as they got it mixed up with Stamford which they intended to record in case it was ever needed for diversionary purposes. LNER also have all the stops on the entire East Coast Main Line recorded (even Chathill and other minor ones) just in case their trains ever need to make additional calls anywhere.
Liverpool Street used to have connections from Hook included in the main platform display. IIRC this included Moscow but no points further east.There is also 'Merry Christmas' and dare I say, I think I've heard of Vladivostock is also in the system somewhere. (This may be a rumour, however).
As we’ve touched on blinds:Not in the PIS, but on the old blinds. I believe that early on at least some Class 319 had Milton Ernest on the end destination blinds. I think I read that at the time they were being built there was a plan to extend electrification from Bedford to a new station at Milton Ernest; I can’t remember if it was a new town or a parkway station.
A WTT timing point in Fife between Cardenden and Thornton which erroneously or mischievously must have been added to a destination blind procurement list?The Railcar site has several pictures of a 101 on a railtour with Cluny Bridge on the blind: there was never a station there.
The story, as I understand it, was that the blind manufacturer was given the relevant parts of a Working Timetable with the places BR didn’t want crossed out: someone forgot to cross out Cluny Bridge.A WTT timing point in Fife between Cardenden and Thornton which erroneously or mischievously must have been added to a destination blind procurement list?
They'd also run into the problem of the route in Nottingham now consists of a tram line, several roads, and a multi-story shopping centre/flat/bus station complex.It's a joke - even if there was a very small chance of some of the route being reopened, there was zero chance of it making it all the way up to Sheffield, and the chances of a 165 making it all the way there unmodified from introduction were even less.
LNER also have Stanford Le Hope (a stop on the C2C network) announcements recorded. I believe this was a mistake as they got it mixed up with Stamford which they intended to record in case it was ever needed for diversionary purposes. LNER also have all the stops on the entire East Coast Main Line recorded (even Chathill and other minor ones) just in case their trains ever need to make additional calls anywhere.
https://www.railannouncements.co.uk/rolling-stock/lner-azuma apologies for the external link but this has a lot of examplesLNER also have Stanford Le Hope (a stop on the C2C network) announcements recorded. I believe this was a mistake as they got it mixed up with Stamford which they intended to record in case it was ever needed for diversionary purposes. LNER also have all the stops on the entire East Coast Main Line recorded (even Chathill and other minor ones) just in case their trains ever need to make additional calls anywhere.
It was only ever intended to run as far as Leicester, with new Parkway stations near Brackley and Catthorpe Interchange (most likely in the vicinity of Shawell, where there's a triangle of land bounded by the Great Central, A5 and M6.) This is mentioned on page 461 of the old Chiltern franchise agreement.They'd also run into the problem of the route in Nottingham now consists of a tram line, several roads, and a multi-story shopping centre/flat/bus station complex.
Nope. The interior PIS operates off headcodes only. Putting a headcode into the PIS will also force write the ‘correct’ destination onto the blinds*With the old destinations still programmed into TPEs 185s do/can these destinations appear on the new interior information screens?
They also show “Electrostar” on display while in service, normally occurs when they go to Liverpool Street on weekends.Class 357s can show "Special Service" and "Charter Train" in addition to the usual "Not In Service" and "Empty to Depot"
Iirc an open access operator proposed running Andover-Ludgershall services a few years back. Personally, I think it would be a waste as there's already a good bus service from Ludgershall to Andover. But there was indeed a plan to run rail services with (of all things) Class 139s!I am convinced I saw Ludgershall on a 158/159 in the bay at Southampton years ago - a destination that is at least possible from there. In the early days of privatisation was there ever a plan to reach there?
That's when the PIS system has crashed or is stuck in boot loopThey also show “Electrostar” on display while in service, normally occurs when they go to Liverpool Street on weekends.
That's when the PIS system has crashed or is stuck in boot loop
"Electrostar" usually shows when switching between third rail and overhead power. 377/2 when they previously operated East Croydon-Watford Junction between Shepherds Bush and Wembley Central and 377/5s at Farringdon.They also show “Electrostar” on display while in service, normally occurs when they go to Liverpool Street on weekends.