A friend of mine travelled yesterday from Coventry to Cosham, on a First Class Advance routed VWC&Connections. The itinerary was
1151 Coventry-Watford Jn
1251 Watford Jn-Clapham Jn
1338 Clapham Jn-Cosham (operated by Southern, via Horsham)
In the event the 1338 was cancelled, and after speaking to the ticket office he was directed to the 1352 to Portsmouth and Southsea (operated by SWT), on which he travelled to Havant with no argument (the guard did check tickets), and then was picked up from Havant rather than waiting for a train to Cosham.
Now, technically, by stopping short he has breached the no-break-of-journey rule on advance tickets. In the event, there wasn't any problem (which is why this thread isn't in Disputes and Prosecutions!). However, is there some clause in the NRCoC which makes what he did permissible due to the disruption caused by the cancelled train? Something like abandoning a journey? It seems somewhat churlish to force a passenger to complete a journey that's already late, when they could make up some time by stopping short and getting a lift...
1151 Coventry-Watford Jn
1251 Watford Jn-Clapham Jn
1338 Clapham Jn-Cosham (operated by Southern, via Horsham)
In the event the 1338 was cancelled, and after speaking to the ticket office he was directed to the 1352 to Portsmouth and Southsea (operated by SWT), on which he travelled to Havant with no argument (the guard did check tickets), and then was picked up from Havant rather than waiting for a train to Cosham.
Now, technically, by stopping short he has breached the no-break-of-journey rule on advance tickets. In the event, there wasn't any problem (which is why this thread isn't in Disputes and Prosecutions!). However, is there some clause in the NRCoC which makes what he did permissible due to the disruption caused by the cancelled train? Something like abandoning a journey? It seems somewhat churlish to force a passenger to complete a journey that's already late, when they could make up some time by stopping short and getting a lift...