• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Stoke and Stafford stations.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
23 Mar 2021
Messages
57
Location
Yeovil
I read that Stafford Station is the second busiest in the county after Stoke on Trent.

I find it odd that Stafford looks like a big interchange with lots of tracks, junctions and five platforms whilst Stoke has just the two running lines.

Does Stoke station cause a bottleneck? Bath Spa always seems busy and just has the two platforms but due to the high position of the tracks and platforms it would cost a ridiculous amount of money to add an extra platform, not to mention heritage city etc.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
4,130
Location
North London or Mildmay line
I read that Stafford Station is the second busiest in the county after Stoke on Trent.

I find it odd that Stafford looks like a big interchange with lots of tracks, junctions and five platforms whilst Stoke has just the two running lines.

Does Stoke station cause a bottleneck? Bath Spa always seems busy and just has the two platforms but due to the high position of the tracks and platforms it would cost a ridiculous amount of money to add an extra platform, not to mention heritage city etc.
Well, a lot of people at Stafford change trains, so might not be included in that figure.
 
Joined
23 Mar 2021
Messages
57
Location
Yeovil
of course, thanks. I was thinking busier in terms of trains but i get it now if its passenger numbers through the gate.
 

SuspectUsual

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
6,737
Bath Spa always seems busy and just has the two platforms but due to the high position of the tracks and platforms it would cost a ridiculous amount of money to add an extra platform, not to mention heritage city etc.

I don’t think Bath station particularly causes a bottleneck as everything stops there, and the lines aren’t overly busy (certainly compared to the likes of Piccadilly P13/14 which is effectively operated as a two platform station)
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
17,220
I find it odd that Stafford looks like a big interchange with lots of tracks, junctions and five platforms whilst Stoke has just the two running lines.
Of course, after passing through Stoke-on-Trent, various lines soon branch off towards Derby, London Euston, Birmingham New Street, Crewe and Manchester Piccadilly. Typically, Stoke-on-Trent has 14 departures every hour during the day, which I reckon is sufficiently busy enough without ever quite becoming a bottleneck.
 

Lewisham2221

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2005
Messages
2,750
Location
Staffordshire
Of course, after passing through Stoke-on-Trent, various lines soon branch off towards Derby, London Euston, Birmingham New Street, Crewe and Manchester Piccadilly. Typically, Stoke-on-Trent has 14 departures every hour during the day, which I reckon is sufficiently busy enough without ever quite becoming a bottleneck.
It's not uncommon to see trains "queuing" to the South of the station, but, as you say, it never really becomes a bottleneck. Never really seem to notice any southbound queuing.

Being pedantic, Re: the bit in bold - surely it must be an odd number of departures per hour, as the Northern stopper only departs in one direction? EDIT: Unless, of course, you pick an hour with the "missing" EMR diagram, or count the Wedgwood/Barlaston replacement buses
 
Last edited:

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
17,220
Being pedantic, Re: the bit in bold - surely it must be an odd number of departures per hour, as the Northern stopper only departs in one direction? EDIT: Unless, of course, you pick an hour with the "missing" EMR diagram, or count the Wedgwood/Barlaston replacement buses
You're right. I'd included the hourly bus. So, typically only 13 rail departures per hour.
 

43055

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
3,684
It's not uncommon to see trains "queuing" to the South of the station, but, as you say, it never really becomes a bottleneck. Never really seem to notice any southbound queuing.

Being pedantic, Re: the bit in bold - surely it must be an odd number of departures per hour, as the Northern stopper only departs in one direction? EDIT: Unless, of course, you pick an hour with the "missing" EMR diagram, or count the Wedgwood/Barlaston replacement buses
Probably because the northbound fast Manchester services are more commonly only a few mins apart.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,523
Location
Northampton
I find it odd that Stafford looks like a big interchange with lots of tracks, junctions and five platforms whilst Stoke has just the two running lines.
The reasons for this are largely historic. Stoke-OT used to have 2 through lines between the platforms, but the passenger service wasn't as intense as the freight.
Does Stoke station cause a bottleneck?
In short, yes. How big a bottleneck and how much of a problem it is would be a harder question to answer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top