• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Stockport - Pontefract = No fares bookable

Status
Not open for further replies.

hkstudent

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
1,431
Location
SE London
I tried to look for trains to book later today to go to Pontefract (return tomorrow) on any Southeastern site and Railforum site, and seems that booking engines struggle to generate a valid journey.
Can anyone tell me what's the permitted routing for this journey (via Leeds, or Via Sheffield?)

1672398791399.png
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,840
There are no mapped routes via Sheffield but the fastest journeys are via Sheffield. This will be why no fares are being shown. Selecting 'Avoid Sheffield' should yield results travelling via Leeds.
 

hkstudent

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
1,431
Location
SE London
There are no mapped routes via Sheffield but the fastest journeys are via Sheffield. This will be why no fares are being shown. Selecting 'Avoid Sheffield' should yield results travelling via Leeds.
Thanks a lot. Seems that's another case of faster but not valid (despite no routing restrictions).
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
16,804
Location
UK
I tried to look for trains to book later today to go to Pontefract (return tomorrow) on any Southeastern site and Railforum site, and seems that booking engines struggle to generate a valid journey.
Can anyone tell me what's the permitted routing for this journey (via Leeds, or Via Sheffield?)

View attachment 126194
The permitted routes are all via Manchester, then via Stalybridge or via Hebden Bridge, then via Leeds or via Mirfield and Wakefield Kirkgate (using the peak-only Huddersfield-Castleford service, or the handful of Grand Central services).

Most of the fastest itineraries, which are coming up as 'not available', are via Sheffield and Wakefield Kirkgate. This is clearly a reasonable route, but it's not permitted as the range of permitted routes is very stingy for this journey (as with several others across the Pennines).
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,840
This is perhaps caused by the fact TPE have set loads of services to Mandatory Reservations and they've sold out?
No, it isn't. The problem is that the fastest route is not a permitted route and therefore no through fares are available.
 

js517

Member
Joined
4 Sep 2018
Messages
178
Location
Cragg Vale, West Yorkshire
No, it isn't. The problem is that the fastest route is not a permitted route and therefore no through fares are available.
That's not how trainsplit works though; it doesn't need the itinerary to be a permitted route as it will just offer splits. The fact those results in red are showing at all means that there are services involved that are sold out.
 

Gathursty

Established Member
Joined
31 May 2011
Messages
2,651
Location
Wigan
Manchester - Sheffield - Pontefract Baghill is not a valid route? Blimey.
 

Gathursty

Established Member
Joined
31 May 2011
Messages
2,651
Location
Wigan
I know people will say Baghill is the awkward station in Pontefract and to go off Tanshelf/Monkhill but OP wasn't specific on which Manchester/Pontefract station.
 

Mat17

Member
Joined
17 Aug 2019
Messages
962
Location
Barnsley
Can't you just buy a Pontefract-Sheffield and Sheffield-Stockport ticket?

Since there's no through ticket, it won't cost you any extra surely?
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,517
Location
Yorkshire
Can't you just buy a Pontefract-Sheffield and Sheffield-Stockport ticket?

Since there's no through ticket, it won't cost you any extra surely?
If those are the best tickets for the job, Trainsplit will offer them; indeed I tried it just now and Trainsplit was happy to offer this combination for a journey departing later today.

The original poster had specifically turned splits off, resulting in a higher fare as well as a slower journey (which is the way the train companies want it to be!)

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I tried to look for trains to book later today to go to Pontefract (return tomorrow) on any Southeastern site and Railforum site, and seems that booking engines struggle to generate a valid journey.
Can anyone tell me what's the permitted routing for this journey (via Leeds, or Via Sheffield?)

View attachment 126194
Although you've not specified this, I can see that you have this in fast mode with splits turned off.

Trainsplit is functioning as expected; if you had it in fast mode with splits on, you'd be offered fares (I tried it for a date in January and it was fine); equally if you had it in Cheapest mode you would get valid itineraries on one ticket.

Fast mode and splits off really isn't getting the best out of Trainsplit and downgrades it to the same level of functionality that you get with a typical train company website.
 
Last edited:

hkstudent

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
1,431
Location
SE London
If those are the best tickets for the job, Trainsplit will offer them; indeed I tried it just now and Trainsplit was happy to offer this combination for a journey departing later today.

The original poster had specifically turned splits off, resulting in a higher fare as well as a slower journey (which is the way the train companies want it to be!)

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Although you've not specified this, I can see that you have this in fast mode with splits turned off.

Trainsplit is functioning as expected; if you had it in fast mode with splits on, you'd be offered fares (I tried it for a date in January and it was fine); equally if you had it in Cheapest mode you would get valid itineraries on one ticket.

Fast mode and splits off really isn't getting the best out of Trainsplit and downgrades it to the same level of functionality that you get with a typical train company website.
I was putting in mind about doing a circular trip so, to avoid being fixed to one route (if there are more than one routes), so to not to limit the route due to splitting.

I was also expecting £19.20 as through off peak return fare shown on BRFARES if not on split, so was kind of disappointed to not be able to see this through fare being offered.
 

bakerstreet

Member
Joined
29 Nov 2009
Messages
1,165
Location
-
Anyone know what the rail industry’s current view is on fastest routes not being permitted ? (As is the case in this thread)

This is sometimes brought up here and as a passenger this does sound rather ridiculous to me.

Isn’t one of the greatest benefits of rail it’s speed?

Why is the mantra still (apparently) that passengers want to travel by the shortest, not the quickest route.

Is there a reason why this isn’t as ridiculous as it seems?

And surely HS1 / HS2 debunks that mantra about speed not being important

The fastest route is not a permitted route. No matter how I read this it does not make any sense
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,517
Location
Yorkshire
Anyone know what the rail industry’s current view is on fastest routes not being permitted ? (As is the case in this thread)
I don't think anyone in the industry is interested in this concept; there are so many examples of the fastest itineraries not being permitted. The entire industry is simply propped up by taxpayers, so there is no incentive.
This is sometimes brought up here and as a passenger this does sound rather ridiculous to me.

Isn’t one of the greatest benefits of rail it’s speed?

Why is the mantra still (apparently) that passengers want to travel by the shortest, not the quickest route.

Is there a reason why this isn’t as ridiculous as it seems?

And surely HS1 / HS2 debunks that mantra about speed not being important

The fastest route is not a permitted route. No matter how I read this it does not make any sense
Well if you know of any journalists who want to make a story out of this, I can come up with many examples and of course we can demonstrate how the TOCs are misleading people while third party sites lead the way. I am not sure if that's newsworthy or not, but it should be.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I was putting in mind about doing a circular trip so, to avoid being fixed to one route (if there are more than one routes), so to not to limit the route due to splitting.
In this case the through fare is very restrictive; splitting is therefore required if you want to travel by a wider variety of routes.

If you have a particular circular journey in mind, we might be able to advise accordingly.
I was also expecting £19.20 as through off peak return fare shown on BRFARES if not on split, so was kind of disappointed to not be able to see this through fare being offered.
The through fare (actually 29.10 for the Off Peak Return or 28.10 for the Off Peak Day Return; no doubt you are quoting the Railcard discounted price) is offered on Trainsplit, but your screenshot didn't show many valid itineraries as you were restricting the search to the fast mode.

In practice you could probably get away with using the through fare on the fastest route, but this cannot be guaranteed.
 
Last edited:

hkstudent

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
1,431
Location
SE London
I don't think anyone in the industry is interested in this concept; there are so many examples of the fastest itineraries not being permitted. The entire industry is simply propped up by taxpayers, so there is no incentive.

Well if you know of any journalists who want to make a story out of this, I can come up with many examples and of course we can demonstrate how the TOCs are misleading people while third party sites lead the way. I am not sure if that's newsworthy or not, but it should be.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


In this case the through fare is very restrictive; splitting is therefore required if you want to travel by a wider variety of routes.

If you have a particular circular journey in mind, we might be able to advise accordingly.

The through fare (actually 29.10 for the Off Peak Return or 28.10 for the Off Peak Day Return; no doubt you are quoting the Railcard discounted price) is offered on Trainsplit, but your screenshot didn't show many valid itineraries as you were restricting the search to the fast mode.

In practice you could probably get away with using the through fare on the fastest route, but this cannot be guaranteed.
Thanks. Was thinking the case would likely be too niche and even conductors may struggle to think of the validity.

Would likely need a bunny hopping over two days on the return portion back to Manchester city centre so splitting may actually limit the possibilities. I think will do the south first then north back, doing a anti clockwise route.
 

Class800

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2020
Messages
2,112
Location
West Country
Thanks. Was thinking the case would likely be too niche and even conductors may struggle to think of the validity.

Would likely need a bunny hopping over two days on the return portion back to Manchester city centre so splitting may actually limit the possibilities. I think will do the south first then north back, doing a anti clockwise route.
With these fastest but not permitted routes, unless it's going via somewhere that the ticket says NOT VIA, I'd be very surprised if anyone knows or cares if you use it
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,517
Location
Yorkshire
Indeed; if the route is reasonable you are unlikely to encounter any problems.
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
5,571
Anyone know what the rail industry’s current view is on fastest routes not being permitted ? (As is the case in this thread)

This is sometimes brought up here and as a passenger this does sound rather ridiculous to me.

Isn’t one of the greatest benefits of rail it’s speed?

Why is the mantra still (apparently) that passengers want to travel by the shortest, not the quickest route.

Is there a reason why this isn’t as ridiculous as it seems?

And surely HS1 / HS2 debunks that mantra about speed not being important

The fastest route is not a permitted route. No matter how I read this it does not make any sense
If memory serves me right, services to Baghill are the worst by far of any to Pontefract. Which makes the rules seem more reasonable when they focus travel onto the usable stations.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,517
Location
Yorkshire
If memory serves me right, services to Baghill are the worst by far of any to Pontefract. Which makes the rules seem more reasonable when they focus travel onto the usable stations.
I don't understand what you are saying.

The rules don't allow travel via Sheffield to either Pontefract station, and this is not reasonable in my opinion.
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
5,571
I don't understand what you are saying.

The rules don't allow travel via Sheffield to either Pontefract station, and this is not reasonable in my opinion.
I’m not so much suggesting it’s reasonable, as a logical consequence of the service pattern now favouring the route via Monkhill & Tanshelf as the S&K has been wound down over decades.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
16,804
Location
UK
I’m not so much suggesting it’s reasonable, as a logical consequence of the service pattern now favouring the route via Monkhill & Tanshelf as the S&K has been wound down over decades.
I think you may be overlooking the fact that when starting from Stockport as here, the fastest route even to Monkhill & Tanshelf is generally via Sheffield & Wakefield Kirkgate.
 

kieron

Established Member
Joined
22 Mar 2012
Messages
3,288
Location
Connah's Quay
Manchester - Sheffield - Pontefract Baghill is not a valid route? Blimey.
It is, as it's the shortest route. What has confused various web sites (and, I suspect, some of the people here) is the fact that the data the web sites use includes a route via Denton. This doesn't appear in the NRT distance table at all, so isn't part of the shortest route to anywhere. The route via Sheffield is a bit shorter than the one via Manchester and Church Fenton (61.5 miles rather than 64.25).

The shortest route to Pontefract Monkhill is via Manchester and Wakefield Kirkgate, though.

You can't buy tickets which are valid to either station now, and you aren't allowed to switch from one station to the other mid-journey.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,517
Location
Yorkshire
It is, as it's the shortest route. What has confused various web sites (and, I suspect, some of the people here) is the fact that the data the web sites use includes a route via Denton. This doesn't appear in the NRT distance table at all, so isn't part of the shortest route to anywhere. The route via Sheffield is a bit shorter than the one via Manchester and Church Fenton (61.5 miles rather than 64.25).

The shortest route to Pontefract Monkhill is via Manchester and Wakefield Kirkgate, though.

You can't buy tickets which are valid to either station now, and you aren't allowed to switch from one station to the other mid-journey.
Good point; on a contractual basis you could travel via what is actually the shortest route and, in the unlikely event you are questioned, simply state you are travelling via the shortest route on scheduled services (as per the Conditions of Travel).

The shortest route in the data is not always the same as what can be calculated to be the shortest route as per the NRCoT; passengers have a contractual right to the latter, regardless of whether or not industry systems will provide an itinerary or not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top