• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Speedwellbus

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,385
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
They are notorious for being a very unprofessional organisation with many operational and maintenance problems. The latest matter concerned the withdrawal of the S50 service by the company and they were accused of not operating a registered service after they had been refused "short notice cancellation".
 

Jonfun

Established Member
Joined
16 Mar 2007
Messages
1,254
Location
North West
It really was a shame about the S50. Despite the problems of those running it it was a very reliable (well, in comparison to FirstBus... mind you, a wingless aircraft would be too.) service. Faster (it avoided Tameside Hospital), cheaper and ran on time...
 

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
According to the GM Buses Yahoo Group:

From N&Ps dated 6th Jan
Section 5.2 – Decisions Taken at Public Inquiries
Public Inquiry (42159) held at Hillcrest House, Hillcrest House, 386 Harehills Lane, Leeds, LS9 6NF on 27 September 2011 at 11:00(Previous Publication:(2582)
PC1061974 SN
SPEEDWELLBUS LTD
Director(s): JACK HAMPSON.
C/O JOHN G WINTERBOTTOM, RAGLAN STREET , HYDE SK14 2DX, GB
PSV – S17 – Licence revoked with effect from 23:59 on 31 March 2012

Previously the company was given a penalty of £5,600 for not operating a registered service (S50) after having been refused a “short notice cancellation”. The Deputy Traffiic Commissioner was not satisfied that Speedwell had shown a reasonable excuse for the cancellation; that to find “reasonable excuse” would be unfair to bus operators who operated within the rules; and that she did not want to risk setting a precedent which would allow any operator who had lost money to cancel services at short notice without appropriate arrangements being made.were fined for not running S50 til the end of the nmotice period (around Easter time last year?)

So perhaps they didn't pay their fine??

Time for TfGM to replace the tenders which I believe are:
188
202
341 342
343 344
394
395 396
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
More discussion here:

http://manchestertransport.wordpress.com/2011/12/08/speedwell-fined-over-suspension-of-s50/

including comments from Paul Sidorczuk.
 

jnrsnr

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2012
Messages
10
since September they have been extremely unreliable in running the 343 service from Oldham to Hyde, strangely only at 1550
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,385
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
This news may well explain the fact that on 6th January 2012, an application was made for the registration of a company called Speedwell Travel Services, which has exactly the same address details as Speedwellbus. One particular point to note that is common to both of these two companies is the name of Jack Hampson....need I say more?
 

johnnychips

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2011
Messages
3,822
Location
Leeds
Have they any commercial services left? The S48 and S50 have been withdrawn as well as the 397 and 239 subsidised ones.
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,778
Location
Somewhere, not in London
Supprised Maytree didn't bid for it, although they don't have much going spare at the moment, same as SLT, taking on new buses from Strawberry...
 

gnolife

Established Member
Joined
4 Nov 2010
Messages
2,047
Location
Johnstone
Back in the days when Speedwell ran evening trips on the 369 (Thats Airport-Stockport via Cheadle Hulme), I found that they tended to run better buses than Stagecoach (the main operator on the route) did. Clearly something changed with them for the worse.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,385
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Back in the days when Speedwell ran evening trips on the 369 (Thats Airport-Stockport via Cheadle Hulme), I found that they tended to run better buses than Stagecoach (the main operator on the route) did. Clearly something changed with them for the worse.

Indeed this is the case that the quality of their fleet and the standard of the maintenance really "plummeted" over the last few years.
 

trentside

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2010
Messages
3,390
Location
Messroom
I have never been on any bus provided by Bowers that have been remotely as bad as what Speedwellbus had been using on the 394 service from Stepping Hill Hospital.

Have you seen what Speedwellbus have been providing on that route?

If it's anything like this, then Bowers will no doubt be a huge step up.

To be fair, my earlier comment about Centrebus is based on past experiences. It seems their fleet has improved a great deal in the last few years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top