It probably has a cracked bogie, which appears to be the death knell of these locos (the 86/1, 87, and 90)
Rather basic spares have been stripped from it, even the pantograph still appears to be in place and this is usually one of the first spares to be removed if a loco cannot be repaired
This would suggest they are only removing basic spares in the event another loco suffers a cracked bogie, a decision can then be made on which loco to repair and return to service
They are able to undertake repairs at a fraction of the cost of UK Plc with a level of quality we could only dream of.
There are plenty of quality products made here in the UK, just look at the AS-50 that Accuracy International make, or the Challenger II?
Many Class 87 locos had to have replacement bogies when with InterCity, at least three were disposed of due to crackingNot sure why you think the BP9 is prone to cracking, it isn't
I believe 014 has given up its transformer to 010, but could be wrong.
Who do you mean by "we"? The UK in general or your particular company?
They are able to undertake repairs at a fraction of the cost of UK Plc with a level of quality we could only dream of.
Good job they can do it on the cheap really seeing as they've had a fleet of trains repossessed by a bank recently. Not sure if that's something that we should be dreaming of really...
A.n.other UK OEM agent. We're talking railway here, not defence or anything else.
The Bulgarian's, and a number of other Eastern European countries, still have pride in their work.

Good job they can do it on the cheap really seeing as they've had a fleet of trains repossessed by a bank recently. Not sure if that's something that we should be dreaming of really...
Point of order on this one, it's the state owned railway that has financial difficulty, not BRC.
It's easily done!