Mk1dreamer
Member
Do you ever see sleeper buses being a thing over here ? I seen ones in America and they look reasonable and comfortable honestly
They were a thing. Stagecoach ran sleeper services initially under the Megabus brand with a bendy coach with 24 passenger 'shelves' and 24 seats, then under the Megabus Gold brand with double deck coaches laid out with beds.Do you ever see sleeper buses being a thing over here ? I seen ones in America and they look reasonable and comfortable honestly
The problem with the bendy bus version was that the 'bunk' compartments developed a somewhat stuffy smell. It also only had capacity for 24 passengers.Stagecoach has just launched a new Megabus sleeper service between London and Glasgow, seven days a week in both directions.
Each 60 foot bendy-bus is equipped with 24 bunks in stacks of three. There are 24 seats too, so you don't have to get into bed the moment you get on board. Stagecoach has been running trial runs of the service over the past few months, diverting passengers from the regular bus to see what they think.
The company says it had to iron out some air-conditioning problems initially, but that passengers said overwhelmingly that they would be prepared to pay for a bed on a bus and so three specially-equipped vehicles have been put into service.
What there isn't very much of in each bunk, is headroom, and while they are long enough for all but the very tallest passengers, they can be a little awkward to get into.
Once in the bunk though, the ride is as smooth as on any other motorway journey. We were diverted early on in our journey on the M1 and the bed can roll you around somewhat on smaller roads, but once back to the usual undulation of a British motorway it was comfortable enough.
Yeah I didn't know that, I honestly thought it would be more popularThey were a thing. Stagecoach ran sleeper services initially under the Megabus brand with a bendy coach with 24 passenger 'shelves' and 24 seats, then under the Megabus Gold brand with double deck coaches laid out with beds.
They couldn't make it pay, and because the coaches were used with seats on day services, they racked up huge mileages which led to the coaches needing replacement.
See https://www.bbc.com/news/business-15392176 for the first era from 2011.
The problem with the bendy bus version was that the 'bunk' compartments developed a somewhat stuffy smell. It also only had capacity for 24 passengers.
Realistically people who want to travel by coach overnight are happy with a reclining seat.
My recollection was that the bunks in the bendy coaches were arranged three bunks high, two sets of six in the front part of the coach, and one set of six in the 'trailer', and were very tight to access. The bottom bunk was basically on the floor. Expecting passengers to stay in those bunks for the whole journey would have been a little restricting.Its a shame the concept never took off, but I still believe the layout on the bendy coaches was a better design, im still confused why they need those 24 seats, just make it all bunks.
There is a video in the BBC link I posted.What was the bunk size roughly ?
Was it? Would you mind providing further information?This wasn't the first time the UK had this concept it was done back in the 50s wasn't it?
Was it? Would you mind providing further information?
Yes, although the fact that the day services using the same coaches didn't work, and the coaches were run too intensively didn't help with the overall economics.The reason why Megabus Gold didn't succeed is simply economics
Plus the practical need to run them 'crew' (2 persons) and the costs of their accommodation at the far terminal before returning the next night. The vehicles were very heavy (because of the bed/ seat change mechanism) which pushed costs up. The comparison is between an 87 seat fully seated coach decker or 41 on a sleeper coach decker. As you quite rightly say, passengers were prepared to pay premium, but not a sufficient one to cover the additional costs.The reason why Megabus Gold didn't succeed is simply economics
The cost of running a coach is £x. You can run it with 24 fare payers (with bunks) or 48 fare payers. To make the same money, you have to charge the bunk passengers more money. However, coach travel is very price sensitive so the majority of passengers won't pay twice as much in general. That, and the experience isn't that great.
It's one of the reasons why Greyhound failed (but not the only one). People say that "yes, I'd pay extra for more legroom etc" but most coach passengers don't.
I did it once and had a bottom bunk - as someone who is 6'3 it was virtually impossible to get into without sticking my backside up in the air or lying on the floor and rolling in!! The bunk was so enclosed that I started to get claustrophobic and by the border I was in the seated area as that was far more comfortable.My recollection was that the bunks in the bendy coaches were arranged three bunks high, two sets of six in the front part of the coach, and one set of six in the 'trailer', and were very tight to access. The bottom bunk was basically on the floor. Expecting passengers to stay in those bunks for the whole journey would have been a little restricting.
The air circulation just didn't get into the cubicles.