DanNCL
Established Member
LNER crews don’t sign the third side of the triangle.What about the Shipley triangle?
LNER crews don’t sign the third side of the triangle.What about the Shipley triangle?
I prefer to be pushed into the seat under braking rather than out of the seat. Probably more applicable to buses, where braking is a lot more rough and unpredictable than acceleration compared to trains, but the preference has stuck.Why do you prefer backwards out of interest?
Which is "the London End" at Burton on Trent, where a station announcer announced "reverse formation" for a north bound cross country HST several years ago?! I told some bewildered fellow passengers on the platform it meant first class was at the other end to usual. The train corrected itself at Newcastle.Which of course would only be half the story - not to mention the fact that most people who couldn’t work out what “reverse formation” meant wouldn’t be able to work out which was “the London end”.
Without wishing to preempt any reply one reason that it is a lot safer in the event of mishap.Why do you prefer backwards out of interest?
Without wishing to preempt any reply one reason that it is a lot safer in the event of mishap.
It used to be the case (not sure that it still is) that RAF transport aircraft had all their passenger seats facing backwards for that reason.
Well, that sort of depends. You may be protected from the worst of an impact by facing backwards... but you may also get a face full of the person sitting opposite as they are flung forwards!Without wishing to preempt any reply one reason that it is a lot safer in the event of mishap.
It used to be the case (not sure that it still is) that RAF transport aircraft had all their passenger seats facing backwards for that reason.
I flew on an Air Tanker Voyager (A330) in 2016 and all seating was conventional forward facing. It was pretty similar to any other passenger airliner other than (IIRC) no alcohol on board.That was the VC-10 with the rear facing seats. the Tri-Stars were forward facing. The current Voyagers, I believe, are all forward facing but cant confirm as they came into service after I'd finished.
And certain fictional vehicles in the TV show Captain Scarlet: I remember a character noting that the SPV's rear-facing seats had saved his life after a particularly dramatic crash.Without wishing to preempt any reply one reason that it is a lot safer in the event of mishap.
It used to be the case (not sure that it still is) that RAF transport aircraft had all their passenger seats facing backwards for that reason.
Showing my age, it was a VC10 that I flew in (XV109 Arthur Scarf VC) in the mid 70s mostly standing in the flight deck during repeated touch and goes at Brize Norton on a sortie from Lyneham.That was the VC-10 with the rear facing seats. the Tri-Stars were forward facing. The current Voyagers, I believe, are all forward facing but cant confirm as they came into service after I'd finished.
Difficult, all the seats faced backwards. No four seats round a table here..Well, that sort of depends. You may be protected from the worst of an impact by facing backwards... but you may also get a face full of the person sitting opposite as they are flung forwards!

When I was a child in New Zealand, my Scottish mother frequently was unsure which direction was North. At the time, I didn't understand the reason.I'm the one who has to ask platform staff or other passengers which direction it will be coming from, when there's an announcement that [my coach] will be at the front of the train. I'm sense-of-drectionally challenged.
Presumably so intending passengers can be waiting at the correct position on the platform.Says a lot that LNER seem to care more about telling passengers where First Class is than informing them that for much of their journey their booked forward/rearward facing seat will be rearward/forward facing.
Announcements at Temple Meads for trains stopping at Avoncliff tell you you need to be in the front coach but don’t say whether that’s front on arrival or departure…Or a XC train to Bristol or Cardiff from Derby......
Or a XC train to Bristol from Birmingham New Street.......
TPO
Except that if you're "in the tropics" (between the tropic of Cancer and the tropic of Capricorn) the sun will be to your north for part of the year and to your south for part of the year.Although the sun rises in the East and sets in the West whichever hemisphere you are in, in the northern hemisphere it goes in a southern arc in the sky whereas in the southern hemisphere it goes in a northern arc in the sky.
I worked in Singapore for a while, which was interesting but I prefer a climate with four seasons.Except that if you're "in the tropics" (between the tropic of Cancer and the tropic of Capricorn) the sun will be to your north for part of the year and to your south for part of the year.
Every LNER platform I’ve been on has exactly this, in the form of “wait here for coaches X-Y” signs.I worked in Singapore for a while, which was interesting but I prefer a climate with four seasons.
On topic, my point is that, even if you tell someone that first class is at the London end of the platform, and they know that London is to the south, they might still be unsure which end of the platform is the southern end and walk to the wrong end. A system of zones, as mentioned above in the example from Switzerland, is easier for the customer to understand.
XC don’t have a London so nothing about their trains matters…XC dont have a 'London' so the orientation of their trains doesnt matter. As long as the PIS can cope.
Presumably so intending passengers can be waiting at the correct position on the platform.
I find it much more relaxing on a fast train to have the scenery rushing away from me rather than towards me. forward facing can give me a headache. I don't find this in road transport!I prefer to be pushed into the seat under braking rather than out of the seat. Probably more applicable to buses, where braking is a lot more rough and unpredictable than acceleration compared to trains, but the preference has stuck.