Just you wait until the weather shuts Heathrow or Gatwick and the TV send out an interviewer to find some passengers from Canada or Norway (where it snows 250 days a year) to say they dont understand why we cant cope with a bit of snow or freezing cold because they can manage it just fine.
That's funny... Stockholm just got hit with a huge amount of snow a few days back, and believe me it went tits up (and was all over the TV and Internet). I believe four people died. Luckily this was after me, the wife and baby had flown back from Arlanda for a weekend break where the snow was quite moderate and everything was indeed getting on as normal.
The first day of snow in Sweden always results in carnage as people aren't prepared (even with winter tyres fitted) and the trains DO fail, although not as badly because they have built a network to cope with it - and many trains have dual redundancy, or electrical equipment fitted on top rather than under the trains.
We could do that, which would then lead the same journalist sent to Gatwick to be ranting on about why we're wasting so much money on preparing to cope with weather we only get for a few days a year.
One thing that is rather different is that for a long time the temperatures remain low, so you get snow and it stays as snow. There's time to move the snow, which is still snow, off the road and into piles in car parks, residential areas etc. People are also dressed for snow, and wear boots to walk in snow. All vehicles have winter (or possibly snow) tyres.
Here, we have snow, then it quickly starts to melt and freezes and then you have lethal ice, with a bit more snow on top - rinse and repeat. We don't have winter tyres (although more people are now seeing the benefits) and many don't dress as if they're ready for a massive unpredicated snowfall. Even if the railway industry sorted itself out, the roads would remain a mess unless we made winter tyres compulsory and people got some common sense.