It’s good to see that the S&C will retain its signal boxes until at least 2024. The walk from Ribblehead to Whernside won't be the same if Blea Moor signal box isn't there!
Quite ironic that when they plan for resignalling, it's the oldest that stay the longest.Funny to think that places like Shrewsbury will still have Semaphores in 40 years!![]()

For instance I thought Three Bridges WAS a ROC, so what is happening under 2017 Three Bridges (Migration Plan Sussex)
And what is happening to Barnham in 2015 so soon after Barnham Signalling Centre was built?
That's the dream of the modern political class IMHO, Capitalism for the elite, communism for the masses.
As Peterborough PSB will close between 2019 and 2024, what will happen to the manual announcer who's based in the PSB controlling the CIS and announcements for the station.
Will they move to York as well or will they be based on the station?
Thanks by the way to Metroland for the spreadsheet,![]()
Not knowing much about the plans could someone indicate how I should interpret this spreadsheet?
For instance I thought Three Bridges WAS a ROC, so what is happening under 2017 Three Bridges (Migration Plan Sussex)
And what is happening to Barnham in 2015 so soon after Barnham Signalling Centre was built?
I also feel this is a worrying thing for the future of jobs. It will lead to the loss of many skilled jobs, and the reduction in manpower is one of the primary reasons given for it. This is at a time when the population is increasing and jobs are becoming harder and harder to find, especially skilled work. I'm surprised the unions are so quiet on it? Remember, the next one on (and by the 2050s when this is done, technology will have moved on a long way to make it far more feasable) is driverless trains. It's not just the railways going like this either, but so many areas, infact the railways are behind many industries (manufacturing started it). The future is very likely to be a small number of highly skilled and highly paid people in IT and management type jobs, and the majority in low paid, low skilled manual labour (probably largely on state work programs). That's the dream of the modern political class IMHO, Capitalism for the elite, communism for the masses.
Metroland said:I tend to agree with you. In 2050 God knows what we will have. Google have just patented driverless cars, so driverless trains (DLR style) might be the norm. In which case you wouldn't need lineside signalling in any case!
Many, many jobs can be replaced by automation and computers, not just on the railway. I suspect the markets may demand this (to make things cheaper) and people may resist. The best jobs are certainly going to be in IT and engineering.
I can see many jobs being deskilled to a huge extent. For example would we even need schools by 2050? Maybe kids would just have interactive holographic pre-defined lectures at 'learning centres' or even partly at home? Maybe surgeons would be replaced by robots, let alone unskilled manual jobs in shops and factories.
In some ways the future is a scary place.
In effect, this is what has happened with the massive closures of industry in the 1980s.
jopsuk said:Even where industry hasn't closed, it generally employs a lot less people to produce a lot more, and generally more consistent, product through mass automation.
My sentiments exactly. Having seen various grandiose plans mooted in the 20+ years since I started, it wouldn't surprise me if many of the dates beyond the next couple of years slip a bit or even change quite dramatically.Believe these plans when you see it.
Whiskey tango fox?King's Cross*
* Will move to Three Bridges
Whiskey tango fox?
It's good that the product quality is more consistent, but that's not much help to the people who lost their jobs.![]()
Indeed, but with many of these schemes, if you wanted to preserve headcount levels, you'd need to come up with some way of running the headways/linespeeds/frequencies the new technology offers but using more people.