Wouldn't it be more logical to get rid of the 43s first?
As far as I know a. LNER only run on electrified routes anyway and b. The 91s accelerate quicker than the 43s.Not really, they aren't restricted to electrified routes only. This offers LNER greater flexibility during the transition period.
As far as I know a. LNER only run on electrified routes anyway and b. The 91s accelerate quicker than the 43s.
Where do they run that ain't electrified?LNER don't run solely on electrified routes. Like I said, the HST offers greater flexibility.
Where do they run that ain't electrified?
How dare you! Outrageous!Oh yeah I forgot about Hull lol
Inverness, Aberdeen, Hull, Harrogate, Lincoln, Sunderland (wrong type of electricity!), and maybe more...Where do they run that ain't electrified?
The GN/GE (when on diversion), the Durham Coast Line (when on diversion), and the route via Cambridge, Ely & March (when on diversion).Inverness, Aberdeen, Hull, Harrogate, Lincoln, Sunderland (wrong type of electricity!), and maybe more...
Not really, they aren't restricted to electrified routes only. This offers LNER greater flexibility during the transition period.
Where do they run that ain't electrified?
Inverness, Aberdeen, Lincoln, Hull, Harrogate, Sunderland
Sunderland's just the wrong kind of electricity, as mentioned above![]()
Easy to doOh yeah I forgot about Hull lol
Isn't the another reason that the power supply upgrade is behind schedule and not all the electric services planned for December 2019 can be supported?