heart-of-wessex
Established Member
hence the "30mph :roll:" coupling up which is actually a bit of a bump but hey ho there you go.
I know that I was only joking hence the
hence the "30mph :roll:" coupling up which is actually a bit of a bump but hey ho there you go.
The desiro's are rubbish at coupling up, theres problems with them at Euston quite a lot too especially when its cold!
I wish they'd left the 442's on the Waterloo to Weymouth Route, they were the perfect stock for that line, as the 444's are on the portsmouth route. Then the 458's could have gone to the BML to be mixed the 460's into some sort of hybrid thats suitable for Gat ex and BML passengers.
As for the arguement about capacity in the peaks, well run 444s outbound of london on altons, basingstoke stoppers etc whilst using 450's on portsmouth peaks inbound. Its not hard....
I think the Pompey commuters might argue that the 442's are better on their routeNobody wants to sit on rock hard Desiro seats!
The units suffered from electrical faults in the couplers that caused in-service failures irregardless of where they were coupled, as the units would not "talk to each other" correctly. As Crossover says as well, there were problems when Hull Trains and Grand Central units were expected to couple and uncouple at Doncaster during ECML engineering works.
Wasn't it a chain on mark 1 coaches?