In the 1971 Jams Bond film Diamonds Are Forever, Bond uses a Seaspeed SRN4 The Princess Margaret to cross the channel from Dover on his way to Amsterdam.
good link!![]()
Hovercraft to Holland
When Bond travels to Holland in Diamonds are Forever , posing as diamond smuggler Peter Franks, he takes the hovercraft across the Eng...jamesbondlocations.blogspot.com
It also went from Ramsgate for a time in the mid 1990s, both the Jetfoil and the conventional ferry to Ostend. I know this is getting off topic, though: maybe it warrants a separate thread on the Jetfoil.The Jetfoil also went from London for a year. Tower Pier to Zeebrugge was the route, ridiculous as it sounds today. I think there was also a later route from St Katherine's Dock to Oostende, and the Jetfoils (unlike the hovercraft) were much more comparable to aircraft, especially in terms of stability. I believe that P&O explicitly marketed the Jetfoils as being like a passenger plane, with meals served onboard and an experience that was designed to mimic being in the air.
In practice though, the Jetfoils weren't really suitable for the Channel at all. I'd even say that the failure of the Jetfoils helped push through the Channel Tunnel in the end, because there was a clear and strong demand for a fast link between London and Paris/Brussels.
It probably does... and don't forget that when introduced, the original departure point for the Jetfoil was St Katharine's Dock in London.It also went from Ramsgate for a time in the mid 1990s, both the Jetfoil and the conventional ferry to Ostend. I know this is getting off topic, though: maybe it warrants a separate thread on the Jetfoil.

I remember this too: a real pain having to go all the way to Ramsgate, then on a bus to the harbour. Probably a slightly shorter crossing but the inconvenience outweighed this. Is this what killed the service? Did it move from Dover due to the closure of Western Docks station, or vice-versa?It also went from Ramsgate for a time in the mid 1990s, both the Jetfoil and the conventional ferry to Ostend. I know this is getting off topic, though: maybe it warrants a separate thread on the Jetfoil.
Nice to see the word Aeroglisseur again. Most of my GCE "A" level French has long gone but this word which was on the side of the old model kit box strangely stuck (sorry but it is a nostalgia thread).a dedicated Boulogne-Aéroglisseurs station and a fast turbo train to Paris Nord.
A further issue was probably fuel costs. The aircraft-derived gas turbine engines used prodigious amounts of relatively expensive fuelAlso the other issue: the capacity of the hovercraft was just too low. They could only carry 50 cars and 300 passengers, which meant higher fares. Combined with the reputation for making people sick, you can see why people would prefer a 75 minute crossing from Dover instead, or the 35 minute Channel Tunnel.
One other issue: the hovercraft terminals were built like airport terminals. The idea was that they were a destination in themselves, designed to accommodate large amounts of foot passengers. But this contributed to higher operating costs, especially when compared to the very basic terminals in the Eastern Docks at Dover and Calais.
That would be the Sedan N500?The French vessel was quite impressive, but very unreliable and spent what seemed like most of its time undergoing repairs.
Yes. Went on it once, and luckily got a front seat.That would be the Sedan N500?
There was another short-lived Boeing Jetfoil service operated between Liverpool and Dublin by B&I with the Cu na Mara (Hound Of The Sea) between April and November 1980. During the winter of 1980, she underwent a refit to improve fuel economy and bad weather performance, and was chartered by RTM Belgium to provide crew training for the Ostend-London route.The Jetfoil also went from London for a year. Tower Pier to Zeebrugge was the route, ridiculous as it sounds today. I think there was also a later route from St Katherine's Dock to Oostende, and the Jetfoils (unlike the hovercraft) were much more comparable to aircraft, especially in terms of stability. I believe that P&O explicitly marketed the Jetfoils as being like a passenger plane, with meals served onboard and an experience that was designed to mimic being in the air.
In practice though, the Jetfoils weren't really suitable for the Channel at all. I'd even say that the failure of the Jetfoils helped push through the Channel Tunnel in the end, because there was a clear and strong demand for a fast link between London and Paris/Brussels.
great post - interesting stuffThere was another short-lived Boeing Jetfoil service operated between Liverpool and Dublin by B&I with the Cu na Mara (Hound Of The Sea) between April and November 1980. During the winter of 1980, she underwent a refit to improve fuel economy and bad weather performance, and was chartered by RTM Belgium to provide crew training for the Ostend-London route.
The Liverpool-Dublin service resumed in May 1981, but it was withdrawn twice with mechanical issues during the season and was often cancelled due to bad weather (like the Channel, the rough waters of the Irish Sea were not ideally suited to the Jetfoil). As B&I were in financial trouble they decided to cut their losses and withdraw the service permanently at the end of the season in November.
The vessel was laid up in Arklow and put up for sale. In January 1985 she was sold to Sado Kisen KK in Japan (which operates ferry services between the mainland and Sado Island in Niigata prefecture) and renamed Ginga. A year later she was transported by ship to Hong Kong and onwards to Niigata, and entered service on the Ryōtsu-Niigata route. She is still in service there, alongside two newer Kawasaki-built Jetfoils Tsubasa (1989 - the first Jetfoil built under licence by Kawasaki) and Suisei (built 1991), though they have all had the forward windows on the lower deck plated over due to repeated damage in rough seas. In 2019 the Ginga was involved with a collision with a large marine mammal that damaged her rear foil and hull, but was repaired and returned to service.
The Jetfoil is still very popular in Japan, with 4 Boeing-built and 16 Kawasaki-built examples still active (with another under construction, after a gap of 8 years). A number were operated by JR Kyushu Jet Ferries on the Beetle service between Fukuoka and Busan, South Korea between 1990 and 2022. During a visit to Nagasaki last year I was lucky enough to see the arrival and departure of Kyushu Shosen's Kawasaki Jetfoil Pegasus, which reminded me of standing on the observation deck at the Pier Head with my dad to see the inaugral trip of the Cu na Mara.
The special low gangways on the centre section of the Princes Landing Stage in Liverpool that were installed to access the Jetfoil were still in situ when that section sank in 2004 and was scrapped.
The world's first passenger hovercraft service was also on the Mersey estuary - between Moreton and Rhyl, starting in July 1962. A combination of unreliability of the Vickers V.A-3 hovercraft and it's inability to handle poor weather (it was skirtless, so could not handle anything more than small waves) led to services only being run on 19 of the 59 days that were scheduled, and it's fate was sealed when the craft broke free from it's moorings at Rhyl in a storm in September, was swept out to to sea and then dashed against the groynes on the beach.
May have been something do with the fact that IoW craft are making a ten minute journey across the relatively sheltered waters of the Solent, whereas the SRN-4s were making longer crossings of the often choppier waters of the English Channel, carrying heavier loads....including cars.Why are the Isle of Wight ones so smooth when by all accounts the SR4s were anything but? Something to do with size? Or have I just got lucky?
I did more crossings on these things in the flight observer's seat than I did on the cushions...
I also managed to get all six SRN4s for "haulage" ( "hoverage"? "flightage"? ), yes - including the short lived GH2005 "Sure"
More than once, when they were doing the £1 non-landing returns, I did three return trips in a single day from Dover, which confused the hell out of teh customs people when they found I wasn't carrying a single fag or bottle...
...and I was a passenger on the very last return flight on the final day of operation, both ways.![]()
That craft became "Island Express" so you've probably had it in both guises?The AP188 bore no reg marks that I could see - it was /probably/ GH registered ; it was named Viking Freja but so far unable to identify if this one is different to or ended up on IOWs.
The other /possibly/ unidentified craft was Copenhagen to Malmo that I did on a day trip to CPH in Ye Olde Dayes when you could turn up and go on the day "fun flights" day trips at LHR. Two MD80s and an AP188. The AP188 bore no reg marks that I could see - it was /probably/ GH registered ; it was named Viking Freja but so far unable to identify if this one is different to or ended up on IOWs.
That craft became "Island Express" so you've probably had it in both guises?
The occasional Mudeford flights tended to be operated by craft from the Hovertravel fleet, have you tried asking the Hovercraft Museum if they have any records of which craft worked on which dates...?So that makes me 13 + the unknown SRN6 from Mudeford.
yes those are exactly the people I had been in past contact with with no joyThe occasional Mudeford flights tended to be operated by craft from the Hovertravel fleet, have you tried asking the Hovercraft Museum if they have any records of which craft worked on which dates...?
Yes, the kit did have Seaspeed decals as well.I was always inspired by the box art work on the Airfix SRN4 hovercraft kit (various examples can be seen for sale on e-bay) - but never actually had that kit -it was probably in the more expensive part of the Airfix range.
examples of the Airfix artwork (Hoverlloyd livery not sure if the kit included transfers for other operators to choose from) can be found on e-bay sales I see.
Personal experience: I’m prone to seasickness if it’s even mildly rough, on ships and boats of all sizes including my worst ever on a hydrofoil thing in the Bay of Naples, but I was 100% fine on an SRN4. My partner on the very same SRN4 crossing was distinctly green around the gills and she’s never seasick on a ship. Maybe it’s a different motion, bouncy and “hard” but not rolling and “soft” like a ship? Perhaps combined with the heavy vibration? Don’t know.Lastly, methinks the allegation of hovercraft being nausea inducing is grossly exaggerated and more urban legend promoted by media than anything else. When the sea is rough, it is equally rough whether you float or hover. It is no less a myth than APT-E tilting made you sick.
Here's a potted history of the hovercraft that operated the Copenhagen-Malmo route.ooooooohh new gen TYVM !!!
Yes I have had Island Express (GH2132)
I'd not been able to match it with the SAS name before - although I've long not looked into it had forgotten about it actually.
So that makes me 13 + the unknown SRN6 from Mudeford.
Yes, the kit did have Seaspeed decals as well.
I thought I saw something a few months ago somewhere saying the kit was being re-released, so I'd certainly keep your eyes open. The kit, incidentally, features the craft in Mk 1 form.
O/T....but the green, orange and white ferry livery sounds like Townsend-Thoresen.It's been available for a few months now, I picked up a couple back in May, my interest being piqued by having assembled one as a child, following a cross-channel trip (with car, an Austin 1100 as featured in the kit) in the early seventies. The return was by conventional ferry and I recall making a model of such a vessel too (green and orange on white - did this reflect any ferry companies' colours circa 1973, I wonder?).
I've always been fascinated by the SRN4 since the experience - it was the loudest thing I had ever experienced and remained so until I saw Killing Joke a decade later. Back in the day it ranked up there with Concorde in iconic, 'Shape of the Future' terms, and really grabbed a transport-obsessed lad's attention.