Butts
Veteran Member
I had an E-Mail from the successors to Flybe indicating they now hold the Data on me that the old outfit had.
Are they about to rise like sphinx from the ashes ?
Are they about to rise like sphinx from the ashes ?
I think it's an odd decision to retain the flybe name.
flybe hardly had a good reputation (flymaybe for their regular passengers) and, obviously, the news of their bankruptcy was all in the news further tarnishing their name.
Established brand names are worth a lot. Far harder to develop a brand from scratch. If someone was to open a chain of shops called Woolworths, it would have a high chance of being successful.I think it's an odd decision to retain the flybe name.
flybe hardly had a good reputation (flymaybe for their regular passengers) and, obviously, the news of their bankruptcy was all in the news further tarnishing their name.
Seems quite bold on routes with existing competition particularly from Belfast (Loganair, Aer Lingus, BA etc)
On flybe, I still find it bizarre they are using the name and brand of an airline that went bankrupt and few have positive memories of.
Heathrow-Leeds Bradford seems a very odd use of a Heathrow slot
Almost nobody flies from Leeds to arrive in London. The railway from Leeds doesn’t go directly to Heathrow for connections.Heathrow-Leeds Bradford seems a very odd use of a Heathrow slot, given that Simple Flying states "no direct competition" there's very strong indirect competition for London-Leeds in the form of rail. 3x daily is only of use for connections if those 3 flights are at convenient times
Not that I'm aware of. The relationship with SkyTeam died with Flybe 1.0.Has the new Flybe got any codeshare agreements?
right, but- connections are only of use if timed conveniently, and without code-share connections are a bit rubbish anywayAlmost nobody flies from Leeds to arrive in London. The railway from Leeds doesn’t go directly to Heathrow for connections.
Or are flybe starting off duplicating services set up to replace those which their earlier namesake left in abeyance??
right, but- connections are only of use if timed conveniently, and without code-share connections are a bit rubbish anyway
Who fondly remembers Flybe? They were as depressingly awful as the low cost airlines but without actually being low cost.
I don't think it's entirely fair to dump on Logan Air for having an older fleet. They could have spent a lot of money on new aircraft, but as we've seen that didn't work out so well for Flybe 1.0. Their ATR-72s are all under 6 years old, and I understand they plan to phase out the ATR-42s as -72s come available on the lease market.On the routes Loganair have replaced them on a lot of the fares have ballooned utilising clapped out Embraers and ATR's.
Loganair have replaced them on a lot of the fares have ballooned
Loganair provides free coffee and biscuits too. OK it's a small thing but the point is that they're not chasing the super budget market. If the prices were about the same you'd choose Loganair.
Yes, they are.Just as well with the amount they charge - remind me of Eastern Airways are they still going ?
Flybe collapsed, Loganair didn't. I wonder if those cheaper fares had anything to do with it?An example BHX-ABZ and INV-BHX in October has cost me north of a £140 for the two flights- booked well in advance with a discount.
On Flybe (booked before they collapsed) it would have been £50 each tops and more likely to be £30/40 each.
Not a massive shock that they became insolvent then really is it.Just as well with the amount they charge - remind me of Eastern Airways are they still going ?
An example BHX-ABZ and INV-BHX in October has cost me north of a £140 for the two flights- booked well in advance with a discount.
On Flybe (booked before they collapsed) it would have been £50 each tops and more likely to be £30/40 each.
I agree about the hold baggage / drinks remarks - but a lot of people just fly with hand luggage and the size is limited on a lot of their Fleet.
The old Flybe Coffee and a biscuit was about £3.