• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Retrospect: BREL clsures was it good or bad.

Status
Not open for further replies.

03_179

Established Member
Joined
13 Aug 2008
Messages
3,864
Location
At my desk
Hope this is a good discussion.

Was the decision to close all the BREL work throughout the UK such a good idea? Since the 2000s began we have seen many new trains being built surely this would have been better to have BREL building them?

Yes the number of train being ordered in the 80s and 90s stagnated but why did the powers that be not think of selling overseas?

I am throwing open this as a discussion as I'd like to see what people really think shold have happened to BREL.

Play nice and discuss ....
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

starrymarkb

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2009
Messages
5,985
Location
Exeter
I think they did try touting UK built stock abroad with the 58 and International coach. But a big issue is anything built to continental size has to go out by road/sea.
 
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
989
Location
Blackpool south Shore
Bad decision to close BREL.
Building trains by BREL gave employment to British workers, directly & indirectly (supply firms, and ancillary businesses) Something that's needed, especially at the moment.
If they were kept open, probably Pacers would have remained on the drawing board! Mk 1 units would have been rebuilt instead at Swindon.
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,575
Location
Macclesfield
werent' Pacers built by BREL/Leyland whilst BREL still existed?
Yes - The bodies of the 144s are mounted on BREL frames, and BREL were very much involved in the development of the Pacer design from the single car prototypes onwards, using as they did a chassis design derived from BR's high speed freight vehicle.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Yes the number of train being ordered in the 80s and 90s stagnated but why did the powers that be not think of selling overseas?
Regarding the company itself rather than it's products, BREL was sold off to Swiss/Swedish firm ABB at the end of the eighties. I can't see what could have been done differently from the train manufacturer's perspective: The 1,064 day drought of new train orders that accompanied privatisation essentially killed off the remnants of BREL. I appreciate the OP's sentiment, but there was no sense keeping factories open, tooled up and ready to go but doing nothing, for three years waiting for the next train order to come along, even with the benefit of hindsight.
 
Last edited:

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
7,244
Location
UK
Its a shame that it was sold off to other rolling stock contractors, and not a private investment firm.
 

gordonthemoron

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2006
Messages
6,727
Location
Milton Keynes
if it had been sold to a private investment firm, it'd have been closed down and the land sold for development, which is probably what has/will happen(ed)
 

daddsie71b

Member
Joined
1 May 2013
Messages
13
Annoyed me the other night when an Italian chap on Portillo's railway journeys was waxing lyrically about their Pendilino and what a fantastic Italian idea it was.

RTC and BREL idea and development I believe, just that the government at the time decided to pull the plug.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top