• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Restoring passenger services to Minehead?

Status
Not open for further replies.

William3000

Member
Joined
24 May 2011
Messages
598
Location
Cambridgeshire
I don't understand why railways always need to be "profitable". The A358 and A39 are hopelessly uneconomic, there being no toll-booths between Taunton and Minehead. The cost of maintenance, drainage, policing and accidents on the road must be quite substantial but there is no direct income-source. Yet nobody ever suggests closing roads!
Absolutely this - I point this out all the time. Of course the argument for both -more so for railways is the socioeconomic benefits and environmental benefits.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
5,393
Absolutely this - I point this out all the time. Of course the argument for both -more so for railways is the socioeconomic benefits and environmental benefits.
Which is both true in general, and becomes much more complex where that railway is also a major contributor to the local economy, both direct (jobs and purchases) and indirect (benefits to other businesses in the area).
 

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
12,967
Location
Up the creek
The Minehead branch was always single track, though with some extended loops.

It was double-track Norton Fitzwarren-Bishops Lydeard from 1936 to 1970 and Dunster-Minehead from 1934 to 1966. From 1966 to the 1971 closure Dunster-Minehead was two single-lines not connected at the Minehead end.

Source: Cooke’s Diagrams, Section 15.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top