Hence the dolls suggestion. Nothing in the NRCoT suggests a 'person' has to be a human. Not even anything resembling a 'person' - guards reserve the right to charge a ticket 'to' luggage occupying seats.
The NRCoT uses the english language to describe and define its rules so it doesn't need to make any suggestion about the meanin of the word 'person'. The OED (and all other English language dictionaries that I can find) make it quite clear that a person is a human being regarded as an individual.
You haven't made it clear in your post that you are joking about a doll being a person, (e.g. an emoticon or <comment>) so I can only assume that you don't know the meaning of the word 'person'.