• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Repairs on the Stirling - Alloa line

Status
Not open for further replies.

PaxVobiscum

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2012
Messages
2,411
Location
Glasgow
http://www.scotsman.com/news/transport/years-of-delays-on-stirling-alloa-kincardine-line-1-3274468

Years of delays on Stirling-Alloa-Kincardine line

PASSENGERS on one of Scotland’s newest railway lines face disruption for the next five years while it is shut for major repairs, The Scotsman has learned.

Week-long closures of the Stirling-Alloa-Kincardine line start next month, when parts of the route will be largely rebuilt because of problems with the way it was constructed.

Rail industry insiders said the repairs were expected to cost up to £20 million – or nearly one quarter of the £85m original cost of the route.

Network Rail, which did not build the 13-mile line, said the first shutdown would be in the week starting on 23 February, and affect only coal trains.

A second closure, from 23 March, is expected to force passengers to switch to buses *between Alloa and Stirling.

The Scotsman understands further week-long closures are expected at least once a year until 2019 to complete the work.

The line is used by more than 400,000 passengers a year and extra trains have been added because of demand.

An industry source said: “There will be more closures, with the same level of activity over the next five years, with work of a similar type at different locations. It is estimated to cost a total of £15-20m.”

Passenger trains run over half of the line, as far east as Alloa, which have reconnected the Clackmannanshire town to the rail network after a gap of 40 years. Coal trains run on to Longannet Power Station near Kincardine in Fife.

Network Rail said the repairs would involve digging down to the line’s foundations, below the ballast on which the rails sit.

A spokesman said it would involve “re-sleepering, drainage and track formation works”, first at Kennet, then at Cambus.

He said: “We are working closely with freight and train operators, and the relevant local authorities, to minimise disruption caused by the works.”

The line, which was the first to be built in Scotland after devolution, cost more than twice its budget, and was finished two and a half years late in 2008.

The problems stemmed from the way the track was laid on soft ground, with the railway moving out of shape. The situation was made worse by wetter conditions and more coal trains than anticipated.

Public spending watchdogs criticised the management of the project, which was run by Clackmannanshire Council and the now-scrapped City of Edinburgh Council transport body Tie, before being taken over by the Scottish Government’s Transport Scotland agency in 2007. An Audit Scotland report in 2008 blamed “weak project governance” and “misaligned roles and responsibilities”.

An industry expert agreed the fault did not lie with the construction firms involved, BAM Nuttall and Babcock Rail.

They said: “The contractors were pulling their hair out about the management.”

A ScotRail spokesman said: “We are working with Network Rail to keep disruption to our customers to a minimum. This will include providing replacement transport where necessary during these works.”

David Sidebottom, acting chief executive of watchdog body Passenger Focus, said: “Passengers won’t be happy about the disruption this will cause, but most will understand it is necessary.”

How exactly does weak management cause a line to be constructed badly?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,669
While cost and time overruns often are formed by lack of risk management the poor construction must surely be the fault of the contractors or actually consultants/designers who are not mentioned here?
 

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949
While cost and time overruns often are formed by lack of risk management the poor construction must surely be the fault of the contractors or actually consultants/designers who are not mentioned here?

In case you missed it in the story here's a clue about the contractors...

An industry expert agreed the fault did not lie with the construction firms involved, BAM Nuttall and Babcock Rail.

They said: “The contractors were pulling their hair out about the management.

With some clients the contractors end up just following orders.
 

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,933
Indeed, constantly changing specifications, an impractical specification from the beginning, insisting on the use of certain sub-contractors who turn out to be useless and many more...that's from non-railway construction experience in my previous life, but I'm sure the same sort of possibilities apply here!
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,669
I spotted the clue, i just would have thought experienced rail contractors would know the ground was unsuitable...
 

Simon11

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2010
Messages
1,389
Having been doing alot of research work on the railway in Scotland, has any major project actually completed on time and on budget with no major issues once finished?
 

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,933
I spotted the clue, i just would have thought experienced rail contractors would know the ground was unsuitable...
They probably did - but past experience again shows that there's often someone who thinks they know better, often with a desire to save money or (in our case) time on the construction programme. The benefit of their wisdom was often accompanied by suggestions that other contractors would probably be very interested in working with them in the future...
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
I grew up in the area. Since the line opened, the fields between Stirling and Cambus, which in my youth were perfectly viable, have been flooded more and more- some are now perma-flooded. That change will have had an effect.
 

kylemore

Member
Joined
28 Aug 2010
Messages
1,047
Was it not managed by the same ex council failures who brought you the Great Edinburgh Tram Fiasco!:)
 

matchmaker

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2009
Messages
1,884
Location
Central Scotland
Was it not managed by the same ex council failures who brought you the Great Edinburgh Tram Fiasco!:)

Yup! The same...plus Clackmannanshire Council. The smallest in Scotland, who of course knew a lot about railways as prior to SAK they had a grand total of 0 miles in their area!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Having been doing alot of research work on the railway in Scotland, has any major project actually completed on time and on budget with no major issues once finished?

Bathgate - Airdrie?
 
Last edited:

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
10,544
Having been doing alot of research work on the railway in Scotland, has any major project actually completed on time and on budget with no major issues once finished?



I think Paizley Canal wires?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Yup! The same...plus Clackmannanshire Council. The smallest in Scotland, who of course knew a lot about railways as prior to SAK they had a grand total of 0 miles in their area!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---


Bathgate - Airdrie?


Fraid not. As to Alloa, anything with TIE involved was bound to fail and as with the trams, the contracters were effectively told to shut up and get on with it!

sad though it is, Im glad the works being done now befor the line gets any busier and perhaps more importantly before the major upheaval of resignaling and Wires in the Stirling area.↲

 

jnty

Member
Joined
21 Jun 2013
Messages
33
Having been doing alot of research work on the railway in Scotland, has any major project actually completed on time and on budget with no major issues once finished?

In Scotland no. Elsewhere yes....

Airdrie - Bathgate was finished on budget and pretty much on time (a few of the stations opened a few weeks late owing to poor weather.) How did both of you miss the biggest completed Scottish re-opening project so far?
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,669
Airdrie - Bathgate was finished on budget and pretty much on time (a few of the stations opened a few weeks late owing to poor weather.) How did both of you miss the biggest completed Scottish re-opening project so far?

Ah that is because they gave it to Network Rail early on ;)

I wasn't being entirely serious simply illustrating that most high profile rail projects have been mismanaged.
 

scotraildriver

Established Member
Joined
15 Jun 2009
Messages
1,846
Edinburgh Waverley remodelling was on time and budget. In fact the recent projects managed by Network Rail have been pretty good.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,669
Edinburgh Waverley remodelling was on time and budget. In fact the recent projects managed by Network Rail have been pretty good.

That is a pattern that i had previously picked up on actually... It left me surprised that they waited so long to get them involved in the Borders Project.
 

PaxVobiscum

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2012
Messages
2,411
Location
Glasgow
I wonder now if the problems on the Alloa line, which must surely have been common knowledge within the industry at the time, contributed to the lack of enthusiasm from bidders for the Borders Railway project when oor Alex was still pushing his "alternative financing" idea.
 

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
10,544
I had had that thought also. That and the fact that beyond Midlothian its a white elifant but thats another debate.
 
Joined
7 Feb 2008
Messages
285
Whilst the repairs are unfortunate, the cost is not high in real terms. Two decent roundabouts could easily cost 20 million.
But it is frustrating that repairs are needed due to poor management.
 

kylemore

Member
Joined
28 Aug 2010
Messages
1,047
Also the Waverley Line rebuild was shaping up as an absolute b*lls up before it was handed over to NR:)
 

mr_towers

Member
Joined
22 Jan 2013
Messages
24
Location
Pitlochry
Out of interest - at what point in the SAK building process did TS step in? Things started to move on a bit easier (construction companies went back to work, jobs were done once more often, schedules and budgets became more realistic) when they took over the great tram debacle in my opinion - did something similar happen here?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top