SuspectUsual
Established Member
- Joined
- 11 Jul 2018
- Messages
- 6,664
I don't know how long the electoral deposit has been £500.
It increased from £150 to £500 in 1985
I don't know how long the electoral deposit has been £500.
Thanks.It increased from £150 to £500 in 1985
£1,593 at today's prices acording to the BoE inflation calculator, so another threefold increase wouldn't be a bad ideaThanks.
I seemed to remember that there had been some noise about the increase when it had gone up to £500, but didn't realise it was a threefold increase and over 40 years ago.
Would be surprised if it stays at £500 after this.
In which case, it was a bit dim of him to resign and force a by-election before the GM Mayor by-election was done and dusted.Practically abandoning the race for a major prize in Manchester to send the cavalry to Clacton to rescue the leader’s vanity flounce doesn’t feel at all ‘well calculated’.
Well they all had 10 people nominating themWow, 33 joke candidates and Count Binface.
I wonder how many will get no votes at all.
Not necessarily voters in the Clacton constituency?Well they all had 10 people nominating them
They have to be voters in the Clacton constituency to nominate a candidate, I have nominated candidates myself so I know how it worksNot necessarily voters in the Clacton constituency?
Police are investigating payments to Reform UK by a company controlled by the party's deputy leader, Richard Tice, BBC News has learned.
Britain Means Business gave the party two donations of £250,000 in the run-up to the 2024 general election, when Tice was party chairman.
Tice has said the money was given to his firm by Fiona Cottrell, a significant donor to Reform UK and mother of a convicted fraudster with close links to Nigel Farage.
Tice said: "This is the first I have heard of it - if true why are the Met Police briefing the BBC before contacting interested parties? Is the Met leadership now engaged in the widespread politically motivated smear campaign against Reform and its leaders?"
Earlier this month, the Times newspaper, external revealed that two donations given directly by Fiona Cottrell to Reform UK in May 2024 were being investigated by the Metropolitan Police.
That investigation relates to legislation governing elections, which bans concealing or disguising donations derived from an "impermissible" donor, or the use of "false" information about a donation including the amount or the identity of the donor.
The BBC has asked Fiona Cottrell for comment.
'Stringent vetting'
Britain Means Business, which is solely owned and controlled by Tice, received £1m from Fiona Cottrell in June 2024.
Disclosures to the Electoral Commission show that the company then donated a total of £500,000 to Reform UK in the same month.
Tice told the BBC earlier this month that it was entirely his choice for the company to give half of the money from Fiona Cottrell to his party.
The payments came to light when the Guardian newspaper, external revealed they had been flagged to the National Crime Agency as part of its Suspicious Activity Reports programme.
Now BBC News has learned that they are part of the Met's investigation into donations to Reform UK.
The BBC understands that the party was not aware of the investigation into the payments from Britain Means Business.
A Reform UK spokesman said: "Reform takes pride in its stringent vetting of donations and always ensures that the Electoral Commission guidelines on donations, as set out in the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000, are strictly followed, as has been the case with donations so far."
'Frozen' account
All four payments were made in the weeks before the general election on 4 July 2024, when Farage and Tice were first elected to Parliament:
- The first direct donation, external from Ms Cottrell of £250,000 appeared in the party's accounts on 9 May
- The second, external, also £250,000, appeared a few weeks later on 29 May, just over a month before polling day
- One payment, external from Britain Means Business of £250,000 was made on 10 June
Tice was chairman of Reform UK until 11 July, having previously been its leader. He then became deputy leader.
- Another payment, external from Britain Means Business of £250,000 was made on 12 June.
Records of all the donations have been published by the Electoral Commission.
Records on the Commission's website show Reform's bank account was frozen in the weeks before the election.
Other notes on the site suggest the account was first frozen a maximum of nine days after Britain Means Business's second donation.
It is not known why the account was frozen.
A spokesperson for the Electoral Commission said it was aware that the Met had issued a statement about an ongoing police investigation and it had no further comment to make.
Other parties are transparent in where monies received originate from. If they aren't they will find themselves under investigation.Are these donations to Reform any different to ones made to the other parties or have the other parties become clever on how donations can escape scrutiny.
I personally don’t care where people throw their money away.
Legal or illegal, do you really think any large donor to a political party is "throwing it away"? They are almost certainly doing it to get favourable policies out of who they give the money to.Are these donations to Reform any different to ones made to the other parties or have the other parties become clever on how donations can escape scrutiny.
I personally don’t care where people throw their money away.
Clever thenOther parties are transparent in where monies received originate from. If they aren't they will find themselves under investigation.
.
I personally don’t care where people throw their money away.
Then half of them lose a 50/50 gamble. To me that is throwing it awayLegal or illegal, do you really think any large donor to a political party is "throwing it away"? They are almost certainly doing it to get favourable policies out of who they give the money to.
I have enough magic beans for all, only I like to keep hold of themEven if the people at the start of the trail are, for example, Russian?
And do you think these people throw their money away without expecting even the slightest thing in return? If you do, I have a bag of magic beans you may be interested in
Thank you for providing your opinions on this issue. I've learnt a lot from them.Then half of them lose a 50/50 gamble. To me that is throwing it away
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
I have enough magic beans for all, only I like to keep hold of them
Bit naive thinking that the establishment are pure as snow they are just more experienced in covering their tracks they are no different to Reform.Other parties are transparent in where monies received originate from. If they aren't they will find themselves under investigation.
If you say so. Btw reform are stuffed full of 'establishment ' but naive to think otherwise.Bit naive thinking that the establishment are pure as snow they are just more experienced in covering their tracks they are no different to Reform.
Bit naive thinking that the establishment are pure as snow they are just more experienced in covering their tracks they are no different to Reform.
See post #2,981If you say so. Btw reform are stuffed full of 'establishment ' but naive to think otherwise.
Whattaboutery.Bit naive thinking that the establishment are pure as snow they are just more experienced in covering their tracks they are no different to Reform.
Bit naive thinking that the establishment are pure as snow they are just more experienced in covering their tracks they are no different to Reform.
What is the point of supporting Reform UK if they are no different from any of the other parties?Bit naive thinking that the establishment are pure as snow ...... they are no different to Reform.
Ostensibly because the other main parties have messed things up and Reform is an outsider with no such track record. The fact they have taken on many of the Tories most responsible for their failure has nothing to do with it...What is the point of supporting Reform UK if they are no different from any of the other parties?
Pulling the victim card is his only genuine skill barring being a pot-stirring grifter.Ah, the victim card. There’s a surprise