• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Ratcliffe Power Station

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

mac

Member
Joined
15 Dec 2010
Messages
553
According to national grid at 1755 today coal was producing 3.8% of our power
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,422
Location
Taunton or Kent
According to national grid at 1755 today coal was producing 3.8% of our power
IIRC Ratcliffe is the only coal power station left in the UK (due to close next Autumn), so all of that coal power is coming from there.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,005
Location
Surrey
Its been in daily use for weeks now even on days with decent wind output and clearly NG has indicated they need it to be available for several months yet to have committed to buying in further coal in advance of its mandated closure in Sept 2024. Of course govt could follow Germany and allow further limited extensions given that gas is more precarious since Ukraine so need to maintain additional diversity.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,834
Location
East Anglia
Good to hear. I do miss the whole coal fired power stations and MGR thing.
 

sharpley

Member
Joined
18 Aug 2018
Messages
319
I work near Ratcliffe. Its been operational most days for several months now. Guess their making the most of it whilst wholesale gas prices are high.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

According to national grid at 1755 today coal was producing 3.8% of our power
Ratcliffe can output about 2GW onto the grid at full capacity I believe
 

Skymonster

Established Member
Joined
7 Feb 2012
Messages
2,061
What a tragedy it’s being forced to shut down next year - leaving the country to rely on unreliable natural sources or imported energy generating material (yes, yes, I know someone is going to say “foreign coal”). The sooner the nation becomes energy independent the better - and if that means digging more coal or drilling for more North Sea gas so be it.
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
10,482
Location
Preston Lancs
What a tragedy it’s being forced to shut down next year - leaving the country to rely on unreliable natural sources or imported energy generating material (yes, yes, I know someone is going to say “foreign coal”). The sooner the nation becomes energy independent the better - and if that means digging more coal or drilling for more North Sea gas so be it.
Build 10 nukes.
 

Mat17

Member
Joined
17 Aug 2019
Messages
962
Location
Barnsley
What a tragedy it’s being forced to shut down next year - leaving the country to rely on unreliable natural sources or imported energy generating material (yes, yes, I know someone is going to say “foreign coal”). The sooner the nation becomes energy independent the better - and if that means digging more coal or drilling for more North Sea gas so be it.
100% agree.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Build 10 nukes.
Nuclear is the only viable option really that can generate the ever growing levels of energy required.
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
7,832
Nuclear is the only viable option really that can generate the ever growing levels of energy required.
Baseload, not dispatchable.

Thermal plants have the advantage of being able to respond to changing demand. Hence plans for new build CCGT with carbon capture.

New build coal with carbon capture was previously proposed, but seems to be ruled out now in the UK.
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
9,414
Its been in daily use for weeks now even on days with decent wind output and clearly NG has indicated they need it to be available for several months yet to have committed to buying in further coal in advance of its mandated closure in Sept 2024. Of course govt could follow Germany and allow further limited extensions given that gas is more precarious since Ukraine so need to maintain additional diversity.

I'd tend to agree. Coal is not an ideal fuel but with the situation in Ukraine the way it is, it seems folly right now to close down any power stations that do not rely on materials bought from Putin.
 

QueensCurve

Established Member
Joined
22 Dec 2014
Messages
2,196
Its been in daily use for weeks now even on days with decent wind output and clearly NG has indicated they need it to be available for several months yet to have committed to buying in further coal in advance of its mandated closure in Sept 2024. Of course govt could follow Germany and allow further limited extensions given that gas is more precarious since Ukraine so need to maintain additional diversity.
Cutting the green crap!
 

40C

Member
Joined
1 Apr 2015
Messages
33
I suspect that the latest batch of coal is being unloaded from the bulk carrier SIVOTA which arrived at Immingham on the 15th, and had departed Newcastle, Australia, on the 26th September, with a call at Rotterdam.
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,422
Location
Taunton or Kent
We should have started that in the 90s.
Or like the French, after the 1973 oil crisis, France being the only country who seemed to learn anything from that episode of history. I think the planning and approval stages need cutting down considerably as well (for all energy infrastructure); Blair initiated plans for multiple new nuclear power stations in 2006, but over 4 years later the coalition was able to scrap them (apart from Hinkley Point C, but even that wasn't confirmed for years). Had it been possible to get it through the courts and other hurdles in a year at most and then construction underway soon after, I doubt there'd have been much any other government could have done to stop them.
 

70014IronDuke

Established Member
Joined
13 Jun 2015
Messages
4,068
Its been in daily use for weeks now even on days with decent wind output and clearly NG has indicated they need it to be available for several months yet to have committed to buying in further coal in advance of its mandated closure in Sept 2024. Of course govt could follow Germany and allow further limited extensions given that gas is more precarious since Ukraine so need to maintain additional diversity.
They should have thought about this even before Ukraine. The whole idea of getting totally rid of coal when they first announced it was nuts. Of course, it's great to be aware of NOx and Co2 emissions and aim to reduce them, but they should keep at least three coal-fired plants across the country as part of the diversity and to retain the engineering knowledge.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,005
Location
Surrey
They should have thought about this even before Ukraine. The whole idea of getting totally rid of coal when they first announced it was nuts. Of course, it's great to be aware of NOx and Co2 emissions and aim to reduce them, but they should keep at least three coal-fired plants across the country as part of the diversity and to retain the engineering knowledge.
Ratcliffe only one physically left. West Burton being dismantled and Drax converting its last two coal units to wood pellets which produce more CO2 at source than coal but dont worry in a 100 years the trees they've planted will have absorbed it all!!
 

70014IronDuke

Established Member
Joined
13 Jun 2015
Messages
4,068
We are so short sighted in this country.
When I take over the country, one of the first laws my government will pass is that the cabinet must contain as many ministers with engineering degrees as those with economics, law and politics BAs/MAs sitting around the table.

Any PM failing to comply will be shot by firing squad, publicly, outside Number 10 Downing Street, within 24 hours of his/her oversight. Pour encourage les autres.
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,422
Location
Taunton or Kent
We are so short sighted in this country.
In our short term election cycles it's much easier to close something down than get approval and deliver on new infrastructure, as I mentioned further above, even getting approval for something can take 1 Parliament to deliver, let alone actually building it.
 

eldomtom2

On Moderation
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
2,368
When I take over the country, one of the first laws my government will pass is that the cabinet must contain as many ministers with engineering degrees as those with economics, law and politics BAs/MAs sitting around the table.

Any PM failing to comply will be shot by firing squad, publicly, outside Number 10 Downing Street, within 24 hours of his/her oversight. Pour encourage les autres.
But who's to say those ministers with engineering degrees will agree with your opinions on power generation?
 

Ediswan

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2012
Messages
3,418
Location
Stevenage

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
33,602
Location
Scotland
Try Cornwall.
Hence the key word 'significant'. There is uranium there, but it's at such low concentrations that it really wouldn't make any sense going after them - the money and effort expended could be better used on solar, wind or tidal power instead.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top