• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Railway Worker Sacked for Drinking 'Herbal Tea'

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Neo9320

Member
Joined
17 Feb 2019
Messages
248
Location
Somerset
Sounds very similar to the tests used in the addiction/recovery setting. Generally I would always ask ‘am I expecting to find anything’. Obviously NR & TOCs won’t ask this (nor should they). As you said, declare anything anyway.

Apologies this was a reply to @The Puddock
 

LAX54

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2008
Messages
3,906
Recent Network Rail D&A tests I have witnessed (two randoms and a 'for cause') didn't feature the nurse asking the donor to declare any medication and the paperwork didn't ask either. The test equipment itself has changed - it's now a little bit like a Covid test with urine so you get a result for various substances there and then, depending on whether lines appear or colour changes. The sample only gets sent off to a laboratory for further testing if the kit indicates a fail. I don't know whether the new kit means they're confident enough in the initial results to not bother with asking about medication but it certainly wasn't done at the three tests I've witnessed. Although obviously if you know you've taken something it would be very wise to declare it anyway!
Which is better then, the last 'routine' medical I had some years ago now, I had to declare all medications taken prescribed and over the counter, although the clearance of meds before taking them I think still applies (did in 2021)
 

The Puddock

Member
Joined
10 Jan 2023
Messages
482
Location
Frog
Which is better then, the last 'routine' medical I had some years ago now, I had to declare all medications taken prescribed and over the counter, although the clearance of meds before taking them I think still applies (did in 2021)
Yes it still applies, though I've never known anyone to actually bother to declare and check simple over the counter stuff like paracetamol or ibuprofen.
 

LAX54

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2008
Messages
3,906
Yes it still applies, though I've never known anyone to actually bother to declare and check simple over the counter stuff like paracetamol or ibuprofen.
When I was an SSM, i did get the odd call from Siggies asking me to check, but as you say many didn't ! :)
 

Elecman

Established Member
Joined
31 Dec 2013
Messages
3,578
Location
Lancashire
Recent Network Rail D&A tests I have witnessed (two randoms and a 'for cause') didn't feature the nurse asking the donor to declare any medication and the paperwork didn't ask either. The test equipment itself has changed - it's now a little bit like a Covid test with urine so you get a result for various substances there and then, depending on whether lines appear or colour changes. The sample only gets sent off to a laboratory for further testing if the kit indicates a fail. I don't know whether the new kit means they're confident enough in the initial results to not bother with asking about medication but it certainly wasn't done at the three tests I've witnessed. Although obviously if you know you've taken something it would be very wise to declare it anyway!
Yes same with my last random NR one had the complete list of Meds to hand , offered the list and was told it’s not needed.
 

Tim_UK

Member
Joined
9 Jan 2019
Messages
225
Anything beyond paracetamol/aspirin needs to be declared. Even over the counter hay fever remedies or cough mixtures may not be acceptable if they can cause drowsiness, for example
I’ve been asked about hay fever on a (non railway) medical. But really the question is about what you take for it. And what you might take if it gets worse that could cause drowsiness.
 

Egg Centric

Established Member
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
2,894
Location
Land of the Prince Bishops
It's not, it's an accurate and legally based explanation of zero tolerance as it applies to drugs and driving. What the government says (for good reasons) and the reality aren't the same. It is perfectly possible to test positive for an illegal drug at the roadside but be under the prosecutable limit when the evidential test is carried out and it happens routinely. That's not zero tolerance. The limit for driving isn't zero.

As far as I can see we don't disagree on anything other than the definition of zero tolerance (or perhaps which definition to use).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top