ralphchadkirk
Established Member
I know the type. There are some very, very odd people out there.I have bumped into one who liked to touch departmental Mk. 2's. Had to shout at him to stand clear as we departed.
I know the type. There are some very, very odd people out there.I have bumped into one who liked to touch departmental Mk. 2's. Had to shout at him to stand clear as we departed.
Indeed. I don't laugh at them either and they do no harm - live and let live I say. But it would churlish to pretend that society generally doesn't laugh at them.
On the subject of slang can somebody tell me why certain train have nicknames??? Like 67s = Skips
What are the nicknames for classes of trains and why?
I never said society doesn't laugh at them. Have you read the thread? I said society didn't used to laugh at them. And it didn't.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
If you turned a 67 upside down its shape would resemble a skip.
20s = choppers. Not sure why TBH. Also 'whistling wardrobes' because of the whistling sound combined with the large number of doors on the sides.
24s/25s = rats, supposedly because they were so common, you were never far from one.
26s/27s = McRats, like 24s/25s but found in Scotland
31s = peds due to their pedestrian performance, or Goyles because they were so ugly.
33s = Cromptons due to Crompton Parkinson traction motors (a bit lame this one TBF)
37s = growlers/tractors due to their noise, or Syphons for reasons I don't know
40s = whistlers due to the noise
44s = Peaks because they were named after mountains
45s/46s also Peaks because they were souped up 44s and weren't named after mountains
47s = duffs 'cos nobody likes 'em
50s = hoovers because before refurbishment they made a sort of sucking sound
52s = Westerns because they were on the Western Region and all called things like 'Western Champion' etc. Also 'whizzos'. Better ask someone who likes hydraulics why.
55s = Deltics. Powered by Napier 'Deltic' engines
56s = Grids because of the square horn grille on the front.
58s = bones because of their shape
66s = sheds because of the shape of the roof
81s-85s = roarers because they roared
86s = electric duffs (TBF this may only have been me that called them this)
Good job I'm not one, then, and never was. I can honestly say I have never written down a loco number in me life, or owned an Ian Allan book.
We get these nerds in aviation as well. I once made the mistake of showing one round a hangar full of very interesting vintage aeroplanes; all he wanted were the registrations to tick-off in his book. Plane spotters - no interest at all in aeroplanes. Very odd... must be a bit of the obsessive/compulsive there, I think.![]()
Not at all, i don't think; surely it's perfectly rational to make a note of what you're seeing, particularly if it's something rare.
And have you never, ever owned a single book published by Ian Allan, not even one of their comprehensive aviation range? Really?![]()
Anyway, why did this turn into an enthusiast bashing thread? Seems unnecessary to me.
I never said society doesn't laugh at them. Have you read the thread? I said society didn't used to laugh at them. And it didn't.
Not at all, i don't think; surely it's perfectly rational to make a note of what you're seeing, particularly if it's something rare.
Oh yes it did. I was there. 1950s onwards. Saw it meself (can't vouch for pre-'50s, though). Sorry mate.
A dalek can often be seen near the four foot, flashing at passing trains.
Which bit of 'no interest at all in the aeroplanes' don't you understand?
Not at all, i don't think; surely it's perfectly rational to make a note of what you're seeing, particularly if it's something rare.
And have you never, ever owned a single book published by Ian Allan, not even one of their comprehensive aviation range? Really?![]()
Most folk are quite happy to have known they have seen things, myself included. If somethings has a name then it is of course easier to remember but numbers certainly don't interest me and for myself is pointless. This isn't to say of course that I cannot understand why some people do this and enjoy it, I personally would get no enjoyment or fulfilment out of it and although I am 31 and maybe too young to remember far enough back, any time spotters were spoken of it was not regarded as a cool hobby and any seen often did fit the stereotype unfortunately
then why would they visit an airfield and note down the registrations? If they had no intrerest at all in aeroplanes why would they go to all that effort? That makes no logical sense at all.
Nobody has said that being a railway enthusiast is a 'cool' hobby (what hobbies are?), but that in the past people didn't sneer at this perfectly harmless activity and simply allowed people to get on with it.
Ian Allan is a publisher of railway related literature, including stocklists and Modern Railways.

then why would they visit an airfield and note down the registrations? If they had no intrerest at all in aeroplanes why would they go to all that effort? That makes no logical sense at all.
I agree. They do it because they are 'collectors' (of registrations). Just like train spotters who have no interest in railways but have to 'spot' every loco of a particular class. As I said, probably a bit of 'obsessive / compulsive' disorder going on.
DO trainspotters have no interest in railways?