90019
Established Member
the good old days ,underground tickets cheap, sealink ferries,europe rail travel
When all this used to be fields?
the good old days ,underground tickets cheap, sealink ferries,europe rail travel
Don't want to resurrect a thread that's not been updated for 2 months but I'd like to add my 2p's worth as this one hasn't been covered:
Myth number 304: it's green/good for the env. and improves engine life to keep shutting and restarting engines on 185 diesel-Dessies and engines love being started and stopped all the time![]()
Very true. Would love to know if it actually saves TPE any money with the 185s doing that. I wouldnt have thought so.
Very true. Would love to know if it actually saves TPE any money with the 185s doing that. I wouldnt have thought so.
Myth # ? Mussolini got trains to run on time by threatening to shoot drivers
Myth 9: King's Cross and St Pancras used to be one station, and were split by British Rail
For a (BMW) Mini engine it can only ever be harmful; but the work cycle for these engines is a matter of hours, rather than seconds, so the fuel saved when shut down easily surpasses the wasted fuel when started up.
And the reduced overall number of hours while running equally outweighs any damage done to the engines by starting and shutting them down several times daily.
All railway staff understand economics.
Myth 50: Anyone in a tie with a nametag knows exactly what you need to know, every time
That's very true. I'd bet good money that a VEP spent less time at a station platform than it's modern equivelent.
Myth 66601:
Myth 66605: HSTs will be fitted with powered sliding doors.
I have been 'told' this on at least three separate occasions since I've been working at St.P, with one person telling me that's why the Underground station is called King's Cross St Pancras!Can't believe anyone would think that.
Next time someone tries that on, you should go to the tannoy and say "We've a gentlemen in Coach C who doesn't know who he is... could any medical staff please attend" - he'll soon remember![]()
Myth whatever number. It is your companys policy to allow passengers to sit in 1st class free of charge if there is no seats in Standard accom. (this was quoted to me by a passenger because there was no seats)![]()
A VEP maybe, but put a CIG up against a 319, I think the 319 would be quicker...
But what I would like to know is: did they survive the ordeal?Myth Number X (4468??) - Mallard's record . . . . [/I]
Neither is true . . . The American locos in question . . . . were very fast, but none were clocked authentically at over 126 mph.
Another myth:
If you have a ticket from place A to place B, you can get there via whatever station(s) you like![]()
For a (BMW) Mini engine it can only ever be harmful; but the work cycle for these engines is a matter of hours, rather than seconds, so the fuel saved when shut down easily surpasses the wasted fuel when started up.
And the reduced overall number of hours while running equally outweighs any damage done to the engines by starting and shutting them down several times daily.
Bloody hell. The Americans really didn't build their main line steam locos small did they??? When you think of Duchesses as a "big" engine then it's difficult to get your head around the sheer scale of something like that. Those locos are absolute monsters. But only a 6 to 7 year lifespan for the youngest loco? That's absolutely criminal considering the amount of work and finance that must have gone into building something so collosally monumental.Myth Number X (4468??) - Mallard's record was beaten by either an American loco or Bill Hoole driving Sir Nigel Gresley on a railtour.
Neither is true - although the first is plausible. The American locos in question were Pennsylvania Railroad PRR T1s. They were very fast, but none were clocked authentically at over 126 mph. As for Bill Hoole, he is reputed to have reached 117 with the Tees-Tyne Pullman, but only 112 with 60007 on a Stephenson Locomotive Society tour. The fireman was Alf Hancox.
But what I would like to know is: did they survive the ordeal?
Mallard didn't, suffering a failed rod in its middle cylinder in the attempt (which has always left me feeling unimpressed with its famous 'record'), and then having to be dragged back to Doncaster after the failure (and 'the record').
Bloody hell. The Americans really didn't build their main line steam locos small did they??? When you think of Duchesses as a "big" engine then it's difficult to get your head around the sheer scale of something like that. Those locos are absolute monsters. But only a 6 to 7 year lifespan for the youngest loco? That's absolutely criminal considering the amount of work and finance that must have gone into building something so collosally monumental.
Yeah, but the CIG would be more comfortable.
'tis a myth this one and all (though not a railway one...) and disproved hereSimilar issues with other electrical equipment. Another big one is with fluorescent lights and low energy bulbs. Apparently if they are used in situations where they are regularly turned on and off they will use more energy than a conventional bulb as they use a lot of energy to start up.

Similar issues with other electrical equipment. Another big one is with fluorescent lights and low energy bulbs. Apparently if they are used in situations where they are regularly turned on and off they will use more energy than a conventional bulb as they use a lot of energy to start up. Then again, conventional bulbs are particularly life limited by on-off cycles, wheras with fluorescents and low energy bulbs (which are compact fluorescents) the tube is limited by on time, but the electronics by cycles, just to make things more confusing.