• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Railway General Knowledge.

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ole man

Member
Joined
6 Jul 2011
Messages
739
Location
LEC5
Yes Rickerscote is the answer he was the Royal Mail driver that hit a tanker
 

Johnuk123

Established Member
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
2,800
Yes Rickerscote is the answer he was the Royal Mail driver that hit a tanker

As his engine hit the tankers head on and became derailed along with 4 coaches was he injured at all ?

I would imagine he was going quite slowly due to him just coming up to Stafford.
 

ole man

Member
Joined
6 Jul 2011
Messages
739
Location
LEC5
He was travelling at 60 though braking for Stafford, he never worked again, he climbed out of the cab window though he doesnt remember anything, he says he seen the tanker just as he hit, the loco stopped inches from houses after spinning around
 

Johnuk123

Established Member
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
2,800
Here is a very easy question.

What is the class and number of the ex-engine that shares its name with a leading brand of mock meat mycoprotein ?
 

Mvann

Member
Joined
19 Mar 2010
Messages
790
Location
Peterborough
That would be the quorn, one of the hunt class d49 62727.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
If correct, find me a loco in tights.
 

Johnuk123

Established Member
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
2,800
That would be the quorn, one of the hunt class d49 62727.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
If correct, find me a loco in tights.

Yes quite right, I knew it wouldn't take long to get as it was quite easy.

Woolwinder comes to mind but I reckon it's wrong.
 
Last edited:

Mvann

Member
Joined
19 Mar 2010
Messages
790
Location
Peterborough
Correct.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
As no one has put a question up, I'll put one up. A southern loco in Rutland.
 

Welshman

Established Member
Joined
11 Mar 2010
Messages
3,068
Schools Class 30923

Originally named "Uppingham" but renamed "Bradfield" after objections from the school.
 

Welshman

Established Member
Joined
11 Mar 2010
Messages
3,068
What about 34020 "Seaton"?

No doubt named after Seaton in South Devon, but there is also a Seaton in Rutland.
 

Welshman

Established Member
Joined
11 Mar 2010
Messages
3,068
From where might passenger-carrying trains be regularly started with 6 buzzes on the buzzer, and why?
 

clagmonster

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
2,442
6 on the buzzer is the signal to pull forward, is it not. In the past, I would go for trains departing Scarborough for Whitby, as they had to pull forward to access the branch, but that is closed and I think you're looking for something current. I don't know, but suspect that it is due to a ground frame or level crossing plunger or similar. I believe there is such a plunger at Fishguard Harbour, so I'll try there.
 

Welshman

Established Member
Joined
11 Mar 2010
Messages
3,068
Yes - I can't remember what they used to do at Scarborough for departing Whitby trains as Dr Beeching axed the line after I'd managed only one ride! :(


But Fishguard Harbour was the example I had in mind. The level-crossing plunger is at departing end of the platform, and as the platform is so long, and the 150 or 153 is usually right up against the buffer-stops, rather than walk to the other end to press the plunger, then walk back, the conductor gives "6" on the buzzer. Well done.
 

clagmonster

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
2,442
Crikey, I didn't expect to get that.

I'm not old enough to have been alive at the time, sadly, but I believe Scarborough-Whitby did survive long enough to have been operated by DMUs. In which case, I think the rule book would be to give 6 on the buzzer. I believe you can still see the Whitby line tunnel at the Falsgrave end of Scarborough station.

Name the 5 largest LNER goods depots in London.
 

scarby

Member
Joined
20 May 2011
Messages
888
Crikey, I didn't expect to get that.

I'm not old enough to have been alive at the time, sadly, but I believe Scarborough-Whitby did survive long enough to have been operated by DMUs. In which case, I think the rule book would be to give 6 on the buzzer. I believe you can still see the Whitby line tunnel at the Falsgrave end of Scarborough station.

Yes, DMUs did operate it. Yes, you can see the sadly blocked-up tunnel mouth.
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
Worle on the down immediately comes to mind. The signal protecting Worle Jcn is a relatively short distance from the station, and will frequently remain at Danger until a train has left Worle and is approaching the junction. Guards are advised to give 'six' rather than 'two' to assist in the prevention of SPADs by giving a further reminder to the Driver that there is a red ahead. Good practise rather than a Rulebook requirement though.

Otherwise, any situation where a platform starting signal is showing Danger and is sufficiently far away to require the Driver to move along the platform to access the SPT or other equipment for communication with the Signaller, provided it is not a permissible platform.
 

Johnuk123

Established Member
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
2,800
Crikey, I didn't expect to get that.

I'm not old enough to have been alive at the time, sadly, but I believe Scarborough-Whitby did survive long enough to have been operated by DMUs. In which case, I think the rule book would be to give 6 on the buzzer. I believe you can still see the Whitby line tunnel at the Falsgrave end of Scarborough station.

Name the 5 largest LNER goods depots in London.

I believe the answer to that is:

Bishopsgate
Kings Cross
Marylebone
Farringdon Street
Royal Mint Street
 

D6975

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
3,046
Location
Bristol
It denotes a point at which equipment can be connected for earthing purposes. (usually around OHLE)

Designated Earth Point (or similar)
 

D6975

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
3,046
Location
Bristol
When the 47s were still almost new, the Western region named 17 of them.

What was the next 47 to receive nameplates?
 

clagmonster

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
2,442
None of the others are particularly well know for having a traditional name, so I think it is going to be surprisingly recent. A few of the 47/7s were named up in Scotland, I wonder about them. Let's be rational and try 47701.
 

Johnuk123

Established Member
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
2,800
I reckon that 18 were named in 1965/66 and the next one was 47460 Great Eastern an unoffical name in 1978.

But I may well be wrong.
 

Mvann

Member
Joined
19 Mar 2010
Messages
790
Location
Peterborough
Wasn't one of them named Thor to replace the one named Thor that was written off. Don't know it's d number but was 47 091.
d1671 was the written off loco & d1677 was then given the name.
If correct, What was 08 600 named when in departmental use?
 
Last edited:

Top