• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Rail experts: Ambitious decarbonisation plan for rail is possible

Status
Not open for further replies.

The Ham

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
12,036
There's been a new report produced, with a final report produced in the Spring, looking at further electrification and other decarbonising of the railways:

https://www.rssb.co.uk/industry-new...ous-decarbonisation-plan-for-rail-is-possible

Britain's railways could remove diesel-only passenger trains from the network and make substantial progress towards decarbonising their operations by 2040, according to leading rail experts in sustainability and rolling stock.

In February 2018, the then Rail Minister Jo Johnson issued a challenge to decarbonise the railways and remove diesel-only trains by 2040. An initial report by the Rail Industry Decarbonisation Task Force and rail body RSSB – welcomed today by government - is the first step to addressing this challenge, and has found that while the target is achievable, there is no single “silver bullet” solution.

The research confirms that the railways can continue to offer one of the lowest-carbon transport options for passengers and freight, and provides some early insights into the way the issue should be tackled, focussing on the technologies that will support decarbonisation.

A final report in late spring 2019 will outline the strategy with an economic appraisal and a road map of options towards challenging carbon reduction targets.

Rail experts are agreed that additional electrification on intensively-used routes, where it is cost-effective and appropriate, will continue to offer key benefits, but that it must be balanced with the disruption and delays it can cause to passengers. They also identified a need to reach a consensus on the local, targeted roles that newer, emerging traction options such as hybrid trains, battery, and hydrogen could play.

The report suggests it’s possible to remove diesel-only trains for passenger trains, but not yet for freight, where new research is currently looking at better options. According to experts, only diesel offers the power and ‘go anywhere’ flexibility for freight to operate on one of the world’s most crowded networks.

Discuss

P.S. I'm not sure if this is the correct place so admins feel free to move. In that it's a confirmed topic, but is likely to lead to discussions about what could happen.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

NSEFAN

Established Member
Joined
17 Jun 2007
Messages
3,518
Location
Southampton
Electrification needn't be a cause of delays if it is well specified and maintained.
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
10,481
Location
Preston Lancs
The secret is as discussed in the report “ a nice steady rolling program” not political headline grabbing schemes. Fill in here fill in there - exactly what the report says.
 

DerekC

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2015
Messages
2,432
Location
Hampshire (nearly a Hog)
This thread seems to have gone quiet - but in fact the final report of the Rail Industry Decarbonisation Taskforce was published in July and contains a lot of thought provoking stuff- see:

https://www.rssb.co.uk/Research-and...isation-our-final-report-to-the-Rail-Minister

Some of the points I picked out (the words are mine not theirs)
  • "Do-nothing" produces a 32% reduction in emissions just from the increase in renewables in the generation mix
  • Without further electrification reduction will be limited to about 57%, with maximum use of bimodes/hydrogen/biofuels
  • 1000 route-km of further electrification (plus bimodes/hydrogen/biofuels) gets you 68% of reduction
  • If 90% of the network was electrified by 2040, that would give an 85% reduction
  • Electrification is the only non-diesel option for passenger at >100mph
  • Battery EMUs are useful only as an adjunct to electrification (for short off-wire branches and to reduce electrification costs)
  • For freight on unelectrified routes, there is no foreseeable alternative to diesel
Worth a read and lots of thought!

Note to Mods - I think this should be a mainstream thread - not under "Speculative Ideas".
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,276
Probably blindingly obvious but why isn’t hydrogen viable for freight?
 

DerekC

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2015
Messages
2,432
Location
Hampshire (nearly a Hog)
Probably blindingly obvious but why isn’t hydrogen viable for freight?

As I understand it, because compressed hydrogen has a much lower energy density than diesel, so you would need to tow a hydrogen tank behind the locomotive. (A colleague of mine who knows a lot more than I do about it challenges that view)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top