• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Quick question about door operation on Azumas

Status
Not open for further replies.

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,788
Agreed. We occasionally have to lock rear units out of use due to no staff, but it’s pretty rare. Having a staff presence in each unit is preferable from a passenger point of view as well. Why on earth people want to see fewer staff on intercity trains “because it works on Southern/Southeastern” is beyond me.
People don’t want no staff presence in a unit, but if a member of staff is absent, they would rather be able to still sit in said unit rather than it being locked out and having to stand in the other unit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Blackpool boy

On Moderation
Joined
29 Apr 2024
Messages
197
Location
Blackpool
In this case dealing with a situation before a passcom gets pulled.

Trust me, it is far better to deal with incidents at 125mph than at 0mph if possible. Especially on two-track railways.
How does that work then if the extra staff member is in the front of the train and the person who takes ill is in the back carriage of that portion? The passcom is getting pulled.
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
How does that work then if the extra staff member is in the front of the train and the person who takes ill is in the back carriage of that portion? The passcom is getting pulled.

A member staff in the unit means the passcom is less likely to be pulled in the first place. That’s certainly been my experience in years of driving both DOO and guarded trains.

If it is pulled it can also be reset much more quickly.
 

Blackpool boy

On Moderation
Joined
29 Apr 2024
Messages
197
Location
Blackpool
A member staff in the unit means the passcom is less likely to be pulled in the first place. That’s certainly been my experience in years of driving both DOO and guarded trains.
im not doubting the need for a second person in the second portion - merely questioning whether it is just down from medical reasons as i first quoted. It just makes perfect sense to have someone in there anyway - you dont need a made up excuse
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
im not doubting the need for a second person in the second portion - merely questioning whether it is just down from medical reasons as i first quoted. It just makes perfect sense to have someone in there anyway - you dont need a made up excuse

If the person becomes aware of a medical emergency they can call emergency services, TOC control etc. and get a plan of action together in terms of where best to stop, and liaise with the driver. They could also make a PA asking for medically trained people on the train to make themselves known. It’s one advantage of having someone in each unit, but by no means the only one.
 

renegademaster

Established Member
Joined
22 Jun 2023
Messages
2,215
Location
Croydon
More gangwayed stock would be a nice thing.
Something the authorities should revisit is if the special rules 125 stock require are actually necessary and bring safety benefits. If you could have a go anywhere 125 capable EMU that could also be used as a commuter train you'd bring lots of operational benefits, and if it's gangwayed even more, such as more flexible SDO and being able to change direction while not at a station.
 

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
2,283
More gangwayed stock would be a nice thing.
Something the authorities should revisit is if the special rules 125 stock require are actually necessary and bring safety benefits. If you could have a go anywhere 125 capable EMU that could also be used as a commuter train you'd bring lots of operational benefits, and if it's gangwayed even more, such as more flexible SDO and being able to change direction while not at a station.
Normal cabs are loud enough at 125mph without having gangway doors letting the breeze in.

Multiple TOCs issue ear defenders to their drivers due to wind noise in cabs - and having previously signed 387s I can assure you that if my TOC ordered 125mph gangway stock then I'd look for a new job.

My hearing is more important than how much I enjoy my current position.
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
6,295
Location
South West London
Multiple TOCs issue ear defenders to their drivers due to wind noise in cabs - and having previously signed 387s I can assure you that if my TOC ordered 125mph gangway stock then I'd look for a new job.

How does that work with AWS/DSD/DVD/REC calls?
 

pokemonsuper9

Established Member
Joined
20 Dec 2022
Messages
4,607
Location
Greater Manchester
Lots of LNER services run fast between London and York, and between Newcastle and Edinburgh. The former is nearly 2 hours, the latter around 1hr 30.
In addition, Avanti have 1 train per hour each way that is non-stop Warrington - Euston, 1 hour and 50 minutes.
Lumo have a 3 hour gap between Kings Cross and Newcastle (Stevenage stops have a 2.5hr journey to Newcastle)

Grand Central also have the 2 hour London - York non stop on their Sunderland services (except the 1tpd each way that stops at Peterbrough)

GWR's Night Riviera has a long journey from Reading to Exeter, and the Caledonian Lowlander has a long run from Watford to Preston (3h 20m) without a station stop, and the Highlander has 2 and a half hours from London to Crewe.
 

Jimini

Established Member
Joined
8 Oct 2006
Messages
2,158
Location
Reading
In addition, Avanti have 1 train per hour each way that is non-stop Warrington - Euston, 1 hour and 50 minutes.
Lumo have a 3 hour gap between Kings Cross and Newcastle (Stevenage stops have a 2.5hr journey to Newcastle)

Grand Central also have the 2 hour London - York non stop on their Sunderland services (except the 1tpd each way that stops at Peterbrough)

GWR's Night Riviera has a long journey from Reading to Exeter, and the Caledonian Lowlander has a long run from Watford to Preston (3h 20m) without a station stop, and the Highlander has 2 and a half hours from London to Crewe.

Isn't the whole point that -- should you encounter a medical (or other) emergency -- that there are many, many intermediate stations that said service can stop at to get assistance?

None of your examples are short of options, should the unfortunate need arise.
 

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
2,283
Isn't the whole point that -- should you encounter a medical (or other) emergency -- that there are many, many intermediate stations that said service can stop at to get assistance?

None of your examples are short of options, should the unfortunate need arise.
Stopping costs £££ when 90% of issues can be dealt with on the move without delaying your own train and trains behind.

I would say only 1% of passcom activations I've dealt with were real emergencies - and of them I continued to a major station rather than stopping at some remote shack.
 

Jimini

Established Member
Joined
8 Oct 2006
Messages
2,158
Location
Reading
Stopping costs £££ when 90% of issues can be dealt with on the move without delaying your own train and trains behind.

I would say only 1% of passcom activations I've dealt with were real emergencies - and of them I continued to a major station rather than stopping at some remote shack.

Agree with your comments here chap.

My only point was the tenuous comments above suggesting that there's nowhere suitable to stop in a medical emergency for ~2 hours, when in fact there are many options. If you're on a Warrington to Euston non-stop run as cited above, for example, you wouldn't necessarily crack on to Euston and disregard all the major (some even NR managed) stations en route to get help.
 

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
2,283
Agree with your comments here chap.

My only point was the tenuous comments above suggesting that there's nowhere suitable to stop in a medical emergency for ~2 hours, when in fact there are many options. If you're on a Warrington to Euston non-stop run as cited above, for example, you wouldn't necessarily crack on to Euston and disregard all the major (some even NR managed) stations en route to get help.
Again I don't think the distance is the biggest issue, it's that on the current railway any out of course stop immediately causes huge delays - even when on 4-track sections.

The last real emergency I had was a passenger having some sort of fit on my train. The passcom wasn't even activated, another passenger got the attention of the catering staff who told the TM.

The TM crewcalled me as I was passing Brookmans Park and explained the situation. I made a priority call to the signaller and asked her for a clear run to Kings Cross and to organise an ambulance to meet us on the platform.

The plan worked perfectly. Upon arrival in London one of those paramedics on bicycles was waiting at the right part of the train, and an ambulance crew was not far behind.

If there were no staff able to go and assess the situation while we were moving, and I was the only person able to talk to a passenger via the passcom - I wouldn't know if it was a panic attack, a heart attack, stroke etc. I'd have to stop on the mainline to go back and investigate, and reset the passcom, and given my own experiences in DOO land continue to a major station to meet an ambulance anyway.

There is then the increased risk of secondary incidents on trains trapped behind, especially during busy times of day.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

How does that work with AWS/DSD/DVD/REC calls?
They are designed to reduce wind noise. None of my colleagues or myself have ever experienced a problem hearing alarms etc.

If anything, the wind noise can be the bigger risk to not hearing the DSD.
 

IanXC

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
18 Dec 2009
Messages
6,614
Again I don't think the distance is the biggest issue, it's that on the current railway any out of course stop immediately causes huge delays - even when on 4-track sections.

The last real emergency I had was a passenger having some sort of fit on my train. The passcom wasn't even activated, another passenger got the attention of the catering staff who told the TM.

The TM crewcalled me as I was passing Brookmans Park and explained the situation. I made a priority call to the signaller and asked her for a clear run to Kings Cross and to organise an ambulance to meet us on the platform.

The plan worked perfectly. Upon arrival in London one of those paramedics on bicycles was waiting at the right part of the train, and an ambulance crew was not far behind.

If there were no staff able to go and assess the situation while we were moving, and I was the only person able to talk to a passenger via the passcom - I wouldn't know if it was a panic attack, a heart attack, stroke etc. I'd have to stop on the mainline to go back and investigate, and reset the passcom, and given my own experiences in DOO land continue to a major station to meet an ambulance anyway.

There is then the increased risk of secondary incidents on trains trapped behind, especially during busy times of day.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Indeed. For intercity operators its a different question to metro and local services. I'd be astounded if one couldn't write a business case for LNER's Customer Experience Leaders in the front 5 car of a 10 car set. Given that they already justify having onboard crew anyway, the addition of said competencies and rostering one to each 10 car train can't be that much of an expense, compared to the impact of operating without them, the attendant incidents of drivers having to stop to investigate passcoms etc, and the impact and delay caused to all the trains in rear.
 

driver9000

Established Member
Joined
13 Jan 2008
Messages
4,559
Multiple TOCs issue ear defenders to their drivers due to wind noise in cabs - and having previously signed 387s I can assure you that if my TOC ordered 125mph gangway stock then I'd look for a new job.

Which TOCs issue ear defenders? Apart from a couple of freight operators and LUL I haven't heard of any passenger operator issuing them.
 

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
2,283
Which TOCs issue ear defenders? Apart from a couple of freight operators and LUL I haven't heard of any passenger operator issuing them.
Generally ones where noisy cabs is an issue that frequently comes up - until modifications can be made to the fleet.

220/221/222 cab door seals are one example of a dab that's normally fine but once the rubber is broken becomes incredibly loud.
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
Generally ones where noisy cabs is an issue that frequently comes up - until modifications can be made to the fleet.

220/221/222 cab door seals are one example of a dab that's normally fine but once the rubber is broken becomes incredibly loud.

Blunt end units at 100mph + are a nightmare for this. Class 360s, I’m looking at you!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top