• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Problems near Rugby (28/05)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Saperstein

Member
Joined
28 May 2019
Messages
517
Location
Chester
I was on the 1710 London Euston to Holyhead Virgin service yesterday (Tuesday) and we first got stuck for about 10 minutes south of Rugby, the guard said a Manchester to London service has hit “something in the four foot”.

Later we had several short signal stops but just past Crewe we stopped again for a good ten minutes, it was announced that a signal was faulty.

Finally got to Chester about 20 minutes late. We did gain some time but lost it again due to the signal stops.

Anyone know what happened?

Thanks.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

whhistle

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
2,636
Indeed - delayed at Weedon:
Code:
MILTON KC     17:39  17:41     17:42A 17:43A   2 LATE  F LINE
HANSLOPEJ     17:46H           17:48A          2 LATE  F LINE
WEEDON        17:53            18:09A         16 LATE        
HILMORTNJ     18:00H           18:15A         15 LATE  F LINE
RUGBY         18:01            18:16A         15 LATE  F LINE
RUGBY TVJ     18:01H           18:16A         15 LATE  F LINE

Weedon Delay:
Pipes rolled onto track, possibly caused by vibrations of passing trains as the pipes are heavy. MOM and contractor removed them to a safe distance.

Crewe Delay:
09:45 - Signaller unable to give a line clear to Crewe Steel Works.
10:04 - TFW 1D13 advises signal black vice yellow. Signaller has no indication.
 
Last edited:

tsr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
7,400
Location
Between the parallel lines
There are suggestions of vandalism regarding the pipe on the line, as response staff were also attacked shortly afterwards. I believe BTP are investigating accordingly.
 

whhistle

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
2,636
There are suggestions of vandalism regarding the pipe on the line, as response staff were also attacked shortly afterwards. I believe BTP are investigating accordingly.
Although this isn't in any report NR have.

I left out the part that said the pipes were deemed too heavy to be lifted by kids.
 

whhistle

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
2,636
It is. (Indirectly, they sent it to me...)
Umm, okay!
I read it that morning and have read the updated text just now. No mention of an "attack on the contractors".
Unless there's something else NR use to expand the comments that you were "indirectly" sent? But I can absolutely say, with no shadow of a doubt, there is no mention of any "attacks".

The latest was from the 31st (yesterday), which says:
"DRIVER STATES PIPES STACKED AROUND 5FT HIGH AND AS TRAIN APPROACHED BELIEVES THEY ROLLED OFF THE PILE ONTO THE TRACKS. DRIVER BELIEVES NOT BEEN PLACED THERE DELIBERATELY."
 

Boodiggy

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2012
Messages
642
Umm, okay!
I read it that morning and have read the updated text just now. No mention of an "attack on the contractors".
Unless there's something else NR use to expand the comments that you were "indirectly" sent? But I can absolutely say, with no shadow of a doubt, there is no mention of any "attacks".

The latest was from the 31st (yesterday), which says:
"DRIVER STATES PIPES STACKED AROUND 5FT HIGH AND AS TRAIN APPROACHED BELIEVES THEY ROLLED OFF THE PILE ONTO THE TRACKS. DRIVER BELIEVES NOT BEEN PLACED THERE DELIBERATELY."

None of the control messages I read stated it either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top