railgunn
Member
I have a friend who bought a German railcard. He didn’t renew because he no longer needed it. Three months pass and he received several debt collection letters that added so much interest and fines that the total is four times the original amount of the rail card. My friend explained to the German national railway company that he bought a rail card and didn’t renew. However, they insist he must pay all the charges, despite him not renewing and never using the railcard after the renewal date. They claim they don’t record usage of rail cards but I find this hard to believe when TfL can show you a history of your oyster card usage and I’m sure national rail can do the same. They say the only way to cancel is to send an email and that he must cancel at the latest 4 months before the end date otherwise he must pay for another year! He never agreed to this and the sad part is they didn’t even try to take the renewal fee from his bank. They just went the debt collection route and slapped on hundreds of euros worth of interest fees in just a few months. Even if the German railcard automatically renews, what they did still doesn’t seem right. It seems predatory. I’ve had auto top up on my oyster card and when my oyster account tried to auto top up but failed, it caused the card to be blocked and then TfL gave me a replacement.
Is it unreasonable to think that the German national railway company should have done the following instead of going the debt collection route and adding unreasonable interest?
1. Use active renewal of the rail card
2. Try to charge his bank for the railcard renewal fee
3. Blocked his railcard if the railcard holder didn’t actively renew or auto-renew failed.
4. Make it very clear that renewal is not an option and they would use loan shark-esque interest rates to quadruple the original amount and hire a debt collection agency, so that there are no traps.
5. Not have email as the only way to cancel.
This seems like loan shark behaviour and such unscrupulous and unethical behaviour by a national rail company seems shocking for a European country, or is this common in other EU countries? It would be interesting to know if this is strictly a German practice or whether it happens elsewhere in Europe or even abroad.
Is it unreasonable to think that the German national railway company should have done the following instead of going the debt collection route and adding unreasonable interest?
1. Use active renewal of the rail card
2. Try to charge his bank for the railcard renewal fee
3. Blocked his railcard if the railcard holder didn’t actively renew or auto-renew failed.
4. Make it very clear that renewal is not an option and they would use loan shark-esque interest rates to quadruple the original amount and hire a debt collection agency, so that there are no traps.
5. Not have email as the only way to cancel.
This seems like loan shark behaviour and such unscrupulous and unethical behaviour by a national rail company seems shocking for a European country, or is this common in other EU countries? It would be interesting to know if this is strictly a German practice or whether it happens elsewhere in Europe or even abroad.
. A year later… we have not received a payment for a new railcard so we will start debt collection and quadruple the “debt” through interest.