Yes, because that allows you to have a day trip. At the moment (and for many years) a day trip to London is completely impossible for any one other than the seriously rich. Really bloody obvious. Bristol to London - totally doable as a day trip. Would you like to go and do a survey of people in Bristol and ask how many would quite like to do a day trip (obvious answer - that sounds great, there is that thing I want to see) and then ask them if they fancy paying approx £1000 for their family to do the trip.
But that is not my main point. My main point is that business users are staying away from these services now because they can. Employers are saying, don’t get that stupidly priced train, if there is no reasonable advance, do Teams. Business users paying there own fare are saying, sod that. The other guy is happy with Teams. Whilst I would quite like a face to face to build the relationship, no way at that price.
Not sure which part of this people are finding hard to understand. Also, a bit surprised that so-called rail enthusiasts think it is okay to see their fellow countrymen ripped off with fares 4X off peak.
Anyway, it all comes out in the wash - if not sorted, revenue dives, the DfT force stupid cuts on important services, people lose their jobs, the RMT strike all the time, leisure users are put off and the railway goes into serious decline. So your choice really which side of this you want to come down on.
This is pretty much where I'm at with the state of the railways. It could be so much more useful and accessible but we choose as a country to both price large numbers of people out *and* pay large amounts of subsidy through our taxes. The worst of both worlds. And people on here seem to want to keep it that way or even put fares up even more(!), or say that people shouldn't even be travelling at all unless it's "essential travel" (god I hate that phrase and hope it dies forever). I just don't get what people think the railway is supposed to be for when they put forward these arguments.