• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Pollution in Waverley Station

Status
Not open for further replies.

PaulLothian

Member
Joined
27 Sep 2010
Messages
695
Location
Linlithgow
News article in the Scotsman: http://www.scotsman.com/rail-drivers-union-demands-waverley-pollution-cut-1-2775532
Rail drivers’ union demands Waverley pollution cut

Britain’s chief train drivers’ union has demanded action to cut pollution at Waverley Station, with fears workers are being poisoned by diesel fumes and toxic dust.

Aslef wrote to Network Rail and train operators including ScotRail, East Coast and Virgin last Friday asking what they intended to do about reducing dangerous emissions inside the station.

The union has branded conditions under the roof as unacceptable in the wake of monitoring results carried out in October and November last year which revealed air pollution levels up to seven times higher than safety limits.

Nitrogen dioxide – produced by vehicle exhaust and capable of damaging lungs, blood and immune systems – was recorded in four areas around Waverley’s concourse.

Readings varied from 205 to 304 micrograms per cubic metre, soaring above the annual average “air quality standard” of 40 set down by European law.

Network Rail claimed improved ventilation and restrictions on vehicle access had helped solve the problem, but Aslef Scottish secretary Kevin Lindsay said the union was far from satisfied.

He said: “We’re asking what actions they’re going to take. We’ll be looking for changes as soon as possible. We want each of the companies to take the necessary steps to improve the air quality in the station.”

Mr Lindsay said forcing diesel locomotives to stop at outer platforms rather than under the station’s canopy was one possibility.

Waverley, currently undergoing a £100 million refurbishment, is the only mainline station in the UK to allow road vehicles like taxis, cars and delivery trucks inside.

Green MSP Alison Johnstone lodged a question with Scottish Parliament asking what action the Government could take to guarantee Waverley did not breach safe air pollution limits.

She said: “It’s ludicrous that people working in the station – those who have the greatest exposure to the fumes and particulates – are expected to 
tolerate the conditions.”

A Network Rail spokesman said: “Air quality within the station has improved since the removal of scaffolding from the roof and we expect to see additional improvements once we have limited vehicle access.

“We are committed to improving air quality, having already limited the amount of time trains can run their engines while stationary, and we will continue to assess what other operational changes we can introduce in the future.”

SCIENTISTS found highly toxic diesel pollutants called polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were four times higher at Waverley Station than the relevant standard.

World Health Organisation findings have shown such exhaust fumes are a definite cause of lung cancer and may also cause tumours in the bladder.

The decision puts diesel fumes in the same risk category as noxious substances such as asbestos, arsenic and mustard gas.
Are there specific issues that make it inadvisable for engines to be turned off? I quite often catch trains at Waverley which rumble into life only a short while before departure.

I was amused by the suggestion made by an ASLEF representative
"Aslef Scottish secretary Kevin Lindsay... said forcing diesel locomotives to stop at outer platforms rather than under the station’s canopy was one possibility.
So that's all DMUs hanging off the end of platforms, then?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

michael769

Established Member
Joined
9 Oct 2005
Messages
2,007
Are there specific issues that make it inadvisable for engines to be turned off? I quite often catch trains at Waverley which rumble into life only a short while before departure.

The engines need to run to keep air pressure up - though very short stops don't matter. A longer stop means revving the engine up to get pressure which will cancel out the benefits of a power down.

I was amused by the suggestion made by an ASLEF representative So that's all DMUs hanging off the end of platforms, then?

A diesel locomotive is not a DMU! ;)
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,157
The number of diesel trains will reduce with IEP and further electrification, including under EGIP. However, IEPs continuing north will have to switch onto diesel and these are EDMU rather than loco-hauled as per HST.
 

bronzeonion

Member
Joined
1 Apr 2009
Messages
673
Location
West London
Only reason it's like this is because like the article said, it is the last station to allow road traffic I, im sure if any other major station allowed this like they used to the results would be the same.
 

OuterDistant

Member
Joined
25 Oct 2010
Messages
604
Location
TOPS Area 43
A few years since I've been to Edinburgh, but the only time I did I nipped into Waverley to use the toilets (paid!) and the air was absolutely thick with fumes!
 

Butts

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Jan 2011
Messages
11,814
Location
Stirlingshire
A few years since I've been to Edinburgh, but the only time I did I nipped into Waverley to use the toilets (paid!) and the air was absolutely thick with fumes!

A wonder Network Rail don't allow us to smoke in there with all these other fumes :lol:
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
A wonder Network Rail don't allow us to smoke in there with all these other fumes :lol:

Noooo, diesel clag smells nice, fag smoke smells rancid :D

Seriously though, I would have thought there would probably be some kind of restriction on trains idling under the canopy if there's an issue. There is a rule of this type at London Paddington for example, and I doubt it's the only one. Trouble is that it's difficult on most DMU stock to shut down specific engines without using 'local' stop buttons, which is time consuming and a bit of a faff (might be possible on the newer stuff (?) but certainly not on 158/156 etc).

What exactly is the situation with vehicles entering the station, can private motorists just drive in or are we talking just delivery wagons etc?
 

michael769

Established Member
Joined
9 Oct 2005
Messages
2,007
The car park was closed to the public at the end of last year but you can drive in to use the drop off point. There are plans to close that this year.

The bulk of traffic is from the taxi rank, my observation on the ground is that that accounts for the bulk of traffic, and plans to close it were shelved following protests for ECC.

The atmosphere can get a bit nasty, Valenta engined HSTs used to really smoke itout!. But to my nose it is much improved of late, but you do get the odd afternoon when it can get a bit thick still.
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
Surely some roof-mounted extractor fans would be another possible solution?
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,051
Location
Reston City Centre
Only reason it's like this is because like the article said, it is the last station to allow road traffic I, im sure if any other major station allowed this like they used to the results would be the same.

Agreed (yet the trains are getting the blame in ASLEF's press release)
 

90019

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2008
Messages
6,890
Location
Featherstone, West Yorkshire
The car park was closed to the public at the end of last year but you can drive in to use the drop off point. There are plans to close that this year.

I really hope they don't, as Market Street is bad enough already, without the rest of the cars and taxis being pushed out there as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top