PaulLothian
Member
News article in the Scotsman: http://www.scotsman.com/rail-drivers-union-demands-waverley-pollution-cut-1-2775532
I was amused by the suggestion made by an ASLEF representative
Are there specific issues that make it inadvisable for engines to be turned off? I quite often catch trains at Waverley which rumble into life only a short while before departure.Rail drivers union demands Waverley pollution cut
Britains chief train drivers union has demanded action to cut pollution at Waverley Station, with fears workers are being poisoned by diesel fumes and toxic dust.
Aslef wrote to Network Rail and train operators including ScotRail, East Coast and Virgin last Friday asking what they intended to do about reducing dangerous emissions inside the station.
The union has branded conditions under the roof as unacceptable in the wake of monitoring results carried out in October and November last year which revealed air pollution levels up to seven times higher than safety limits.
Nitrogen dioxide produced by vehicle exhaust and capable of damaging lungs, blood and immune systems was recorded in four areas around Waverleys concourse.
Readings varied from 205 to 304 micrograms per cubic metre, soaring above the annual average air quality standard of 40 set down by European law.
Network Rail claimed improved ventilation and restrictions on vehicle access had helped solve the problem, but Aslef Scottish secretary Kevin Lindsay said the union was far from satisfied.
He said: Were asking what actions theyre going to take. Well be looking for changes as soon as possible. We want each of the companies to take the necessary steps to improve the air quality in the station.
Mr Lindsay said forcing diesel locomotives to stop at outer platforms rather than under the stations canopy was one possibility.
Waverley, currently undergoing a £100 million refurbishment, is the only mainline station in the UK to allow road vehicles like taxis, cars and delivery trucks inside.
Green MSP Alison Johnstone lodged a question with Scottish Parliament asking what action the Government could take to guarantee Waverley did not breach safe air pollution limits.
She said: Its ludicrous that people working in the station those who have the greatest exposure to the fumes and particulates are expected to tolerate the conditions.
A Network Rail spokesman said: Air quality within the station has improved since the removal of scaffolding from the roof and we expect to see additional improvements once we have limited vehicle access.
We are committed to improving air quality, having already limited the amount of time trains can run their engines while stationary, and we will continue to assess what other operational changes we can introduce in the future.
SCIENTISTS found highly toxic diesel pollutants called polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were four times higher at Waverley Station than the relevant standard.
World Health Organisation findings have shown such exhaust fumes are a definite cause of lung cancer and may also cause tumours in the bladder.
The decision puts diesel fumes in the same risk category as noxious substances such as asbestos, arsenic and mustard gas.
I was amused by the suggestion made by an ASLEF representative
So that's all DMUs hanging off the end of platforms, then?"Aslef Scottish secretary Kevin Lindsay... said forcing diesel locomotives to stop at outer platforms rather than under the stations canopy was one possibility.