• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Platform faces - widest

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lee_Again

Member
Joined
29 Sep 2007
Messages
691
Location
Stevenage
What's the widest gap between two platform faces?

I'll start with Farnborough Main. Four tracks and a huge gap between the centre tracks.

Anybody know of wider.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
for a two track station, Larbert must be close to being a winner.

What about Raynes Park? Four tracks between the platforms, but the platforms don't face each other due to the offset.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,266
Location
Yorks
I think that the gap between the Windsor and main line platforms at Clapham Jnc must be quite wide including the carriage shed roads etc.
 

table38

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
1,812
Location
Stalybridge
What if it was a single island platform - would you measure it round the "long" way as the circumference of the earth (24901.55 miles) ? :)

(Oh no, the pedantry has started - Ed :))
 

table38

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
1,812
Location
Stalybridge
Yes, so really the answer to the question is to find the station with the narrowest single island platform.

I'd nominate one of the Glasgow Underground stations, although as they are below ground level, the circumference of the earth will be slightly less...
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
Yes, so really the answer to the question is to find the station with the narrowest single island platform.

I'd nominate one of the Glasgow Underground stations, although as they are below ground level, the circumference of the earth will be slightly less...

"Slightly" is right :lol:

Could the Northern Line Clapham stations beat them?
 

table38

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
1,812
Location
Stalybridge
Really you want something high up - do any of the stations on the Snowdon Mountain Railway with a passing loop have an island platform? :)
 

12CSVT

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2010
Messages
2,611
Cardonald, and the two Hillington stations are probable contendors
 

table38

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
1,812
Location
Stalybridge
Abergele & Pensarn station on the North Wales coast is pretty wide between platforms..

Good call, that (was) four tracks and a signalbox wide, and seems to get wider towards the road bridge. Google Earth says its about 23.5 metres.

a&p.jpg
 

Cherry_Picker

Established Member
Joined
18 Apr 2011
Messages
2,825
Location
Birmingham
A few places on the Chiltern mainline. Leamington Spa, but that has two through roads between the platform loops. Ditto Princes Risborough (albeit with only one through road) and West Ruislip. There were huge gaps between platforms at Bicester North until Evergreen 3 and Denham until a new island platform was built (and there is still room for a through road even with the island platform in place). The staggered platforms at High Wycombe mean there is a large gap between the two platform faces, and Beaconsfield must have fifty feet between the two platforms.
 

Cherry_Picker

Established Member
Joined
18 Apr 2011
Messages
2,825
Location
Birmingham
I would say Google Earth is not the most accurate tool in the world, I certainly wouldnt trust it to tolerances of 30cm (12 inches in old money)
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
17,797
Location
Epsom
Beaconsfield must have fifty feet between the two platforms.

Hasn't Beaconsfield been ruined, err rebuilt, with a platform extension onto the trackbed, making it impossible to re-instate an up passing loop there now?
 

Cherry_Picker

Established Member
Joined
18 Apr 2011
Messages
2,825
Location
Birmingham
As long as it is consistently inaccurate, it'll do as a comparison tool :)

But it is not consistently inaccurate. It is relying on people to click accurately on either edge of a low resolution photo which was taken from a plane. Dont get me wrong, it is a brilliant brilliant tool and it is great at giving rough estimates at distances but it far too imprecise to say whether one 25 metre gap is slightly larger than another 25 metre gap. The tolerances are just too big for that.


Hasn't Beaconsfield been ruined, err rebuilt, with a platform extension onto the trackbed, making it impossible to re-instate an up passing loop there now?

No, you are probably thinking of Denham, which had a new island platform placed in the middle two or three years ago. There is still room for an up through line which would make the current up line into a platform loop. Dont think it is likely to happen any time soon. There is something going on at Beaconsfield though, the P Way are setting something up. It looks like they might be moving the overbridge to a different part of the platform. I have to confess I havent been paying much attention though so I might be horribly wrong.
 

table38

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
1,812
Location
Stalybridge
But it is not consistently inaccurate. It is relying on people to click accurately on either edge of a low resolution photo which was taken from a plane. Dont get me wrong, it is a brilliant brilliant tool and it is great at giving rough estimates at distances but it far too imprecise to say whether one 25 metre gap is slightly larger than another 25 metre gap. The tolerances are just too big for that.

I think you missed the smiley! What would you suggest we use instead - a tape measure? :)
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,237
Is there a standard gap required?
Abergele, Farnborough, Cheam; all 23-24m?

As far as the LSWR mainline goes, Farnborough Main is slightly wider than most of the original island platform stations. Hook and Winchfield have had their islands removed and the remaining gap is about 21.5m, likewise Walton on Thames and Esher have islands remaining but out of use, the overall gap between the outer platform edges is again about 21.5 m. (Google Earth accuracy!)

Is it possible Farnborough is slightly wider than the norm for the line because it has a more significant curve?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top