HSTEd
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 14 Jul 2011
- Messages
- 20,281
Out of interest, does anything actually use the canal now or is it just a pleasure boat route/piece of the urban landscape.
Out of interest, does anything actually use the canal now or is it just a pleasure boat route/piece of the urban landscape.
It's just pleasure cruises now along the Regent's Canal afaik. There is also a bundle of National Grid infrastructure buried under the towpath along the KX / St Pancras section.
Is it ever used for moving water to the Lea Valley reservoirs? I ask because I just wrote to DEFRA suggesting that as an idea.
Copenhagen Junction and the North London incline to access the up or down slow ( I think there is an up slow/down slow crossover inside Copenhagen tunnel for this purpose)
I was at KX this morning, sadly I did not see it there
In my opinion it would be a good move to have a 250-260m tilting EMU similar to the Class 390 for future inter-regional and inter-city service on the ECML once the IC125 and IC225 fleets are retired or shifted elsewhere as a cheaper (and already proven) alternative to the ridiculously overmanaged IEP. An EMU with capability of enhanced speeds would be a far better way to increase the service level on the ECML than adding tons of carriages to existing trains and embarking on infrastructure megaprojects to match. It doesn't need to be another order of the Class 390 exactly as used by Virgin, it could be a "Class 391" or "Class 390/5" with certain specifications changed to improve on the 390 and/or account for any different requirements specific to the ECML.
Is that when you had your tape measure out planning your extension?![]()
It's just pleasure cruises now along the Regent's Canal afaik. There is also a bundle of National Grid infrastructure buried under the towpath along the KX / St Pancras section.

To ask for one clarification, do class 92s have ETS? I thought they did (past tense at least) for the Nightstar services.
Re - the tilt EPS which might be of use on northern sections I would agree, but the assumption that the Pendolino would be a good train for the route is used by many as yet another stick with which to beat the IEP - a train that will likely be a step change for the better in passenger environment from the 390 and even ex-BR stock. ICWC is saddled with the wretched thing for decades. Please not the EC as well.
Yes. My understanding is that they provide Continental voltage ETS, but have since been modified to UK voltage. I'd guess they're not used on the likes of the sleepers etc because they're more useful as freight engines, being very powerful and very good haulers.
Just noticed that the Railway Eye blog has a good shot of the Pendo at KX
http://railwayeye.blogspot.com/2012/03/ec-pendolino-there-is-more-joy-in.html
9 Car AlanIs that the 11 car version?
Is that the 11 car version?
It's 57304, I mentioned it back in post no.270 but it's kinda been a bit swamped...There was also a Virgin 57 Thunderbird on standby. It was at Newcastle but i am unsure if it followed the Pendo in case of an emergency
So East Coast is a bit jittery then.......
Although Pendos doesn't really kill IEP as they aren't getting any electric ones.
The DfT need to announce replacement of the 225 fleet with the IEP to make the project bigger and better value - and kill off the Pendolino idea before it gets any further. If the EC Scottish routes north of Edinburgh can be turned over to Scotrail, ICEC could be all electric with a cascade of all ex- InterCity stock. The Hull/Harrogates chould be turned over to open access using eVoyagers or the CSRE Polaris.
HSTs are to be retained on this route.bi-modes will need to be built for the Great Western to Penzance anyway
It was 390055 and it was 11 car! (According to my source who saw it in Waverley last night)
No, it was a 9-car, your source is wrong.
Look, you can count them here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqnD-BRTUPA#t=0m40s
Thanks for the link, it was a pleasure to shoot it!![]()