• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Pendolino Question

Status
Not open for further replies.

Doomotron

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2018
Messages
1,428
Location
Kent
I've heard that later-built coaches like the ones for extending 9-coach ones to 11 are quite different than originals. Is this true, and if so, what are they?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,914
Location
Cambridge
Are they? I haven’t noticed it myself, and I’ve been on Pendolinos many times - in fact I’ve been on all existing fifty six of them! But I cannot say I’ve noticed this.

Having said that, I very rarely stray out of Coaches H and K when I’m on the Pendolinos. Or Quiet Zone A if I’m travelling Standard on a rover or something.
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
18,361
Location
Glasgow
I've heard that later-built coaches like the ones for extending 9-coach ones to 11 are quite different than originals. Is this true, and if so, what are they?

Only slightly, the 11-car had Motor Standard Open (MSO)seating 74 and one Trailer Standard Open (TSO) seating 76 as the extra vehicles. The TSO is present in the 9-car as Coach E but seating 74 and there is no MSO in the 9-car.

The formations were originally -

9-car: DMSO-MSOD-PTSORMB-MSOD-TSO-MFO^-PTFO-MFOD-DMRFO

11-car: DMSO-MSOD-PTSORMB-MSOD-TSO-MSO*-TSO*-MFO-PTFO-MFOD-DMRFO

* additional vehicles in 11-car
^ since converted to standard class

For completeness, it should be remembered the 390s were originally going to be all 8-car, and about 17 entered service as such:

DMSO-MSOD-PTSORMB-MSOD-MFO-PTFO-MFOD-DMRFO

The difference is one less Standard Class car a TSO.
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,581
Location
Macclesfield
For completeness, it should be remembered the 390s were originally going to be all 8-car, and about 17 entered service as such:
Actually the first 34 sets were delivered as 8 car formations (With an equal number of first and standard class vehicles!). They all received their ninth vehicle during 2004 - 05.

The new trailer vehicles on the 11 car sets all feature a transformer, giving the trains three in their formation, but no pantograph, which makes them a little unusual, but other than that there's little to tell the additional vehicles apart from the rest of the formation. I've spent quite a lot of time in Coach U over the years so I'm quite familiar with the newer vehicles.
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
18,361
Location
Glasgow
Actually the first 34 sets were delivered as 8 car formations (With an equal number of first and standard class vehicles!). They all received their ninth vehicle during 2004 - 05.

I knew the formation, but I might be known I'd get the number entering service as 8-car wrong.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,904
Actually the first 34 sets were delivered as 8 car formations (With an equal number of first and standard class vehicles!). They all received their ninth vehicle during 2004 - 05.

The new trailer vehicles on the 11 car sets all feature a transformer, giving the trains three in their formation, but no pantograph, which makes them a little unusual, but other than that there's little to tell the additional vehicles apart from the rest of the formation. I've spent quite a lot of time in Coach U over the years so I'm quite familiar with the newer vehicles.
One of the two extra vehicles in the 11 car sets is a motor car, not a trailer, which is why an additional transformer is needed.
 

a_c_skinner

Established Member
Joined
21 Jun 2013
Messages
1,708
So is the transformer in what looks like an empty pantograph well on one of the new vehicles?
 

Merle Haggard

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2019
Messages
3,991
Location
Northampton
Tangential I know, but earlier in the thread there was reference to the DMRFO (coach K). Does anyone know why it has the R?. In the carriage codes in BR days, R signified a Restaurant coach (where diners sat to eat their meals) - for example, the Mk 1 RUO and RFO coaches had loose seats to make dining easier, but that was all. A kitchen in a catering vehicle code was indicated by K; e.g. RBK which had dining seats, kitchen (and buffet). Meals are served at seat in all the first class coaches of a Pendo., not just coach K; but coach K has a kitchen. Probably 'just one of those things' and trivial, I know...
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,581
Location
Macclesfield
One of the two extra vehicles in the 11 car sets is a motor car, not a trailer, which is why an additional transformer is needed.
I know, which is why I specified that the transformer is on the trailers (i.e. as opposed to the motored vehicles).
 
Last edited:

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
18,361
Location
Glasgow
Tangential I know, but earlier in the thread there was reference to the DMRFO (coach K). Does anyone know why it has the R?. In the carriage codes in BR days, R signified a Restaurant coach (where diners sat to eat their meals) - for example, the Mk 1 RUO and RFO coaches had loose seats to make dining easier, but that was all. A kitchen in a catering vehicle code was indicated by K; e.g. RBK which had dining seats, kitchen (and buffet). Meals are served at seat in all the first class coaches of a Pendo., not just coach K; but coach K has a kitchen. Probably 'just one of those things' and trivial, I know...

The 222 Meridians are also coded 'R' for Restaurant in the DMRFO rather than K for kitchen. In fact I'm not sure any modern trains use 'K', opting instead for 'R'.
 

Merle Haggard

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2019
Messages
3,991
Location
Northampton
The 222 Meridians are also coded 'R' for Restaurant in the DMRFO rather than K for kitchen. In fact I'm not sure any modern trains use 'K', opting instead for 'R'.
Thanks for that, and I hadn't noticed the 222s were the same. It is quite amazing, though, that a system introduced by the LNER before the war is still being used and hasn't required that much alteration, apart from innovations such as Battery and Pantograph.
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
18,361
Location
Glasgow
Thanks for that, and I hadn't noticed the 222s were the same. It is quite amazing, though, that a system introduced by the LNER before the war is still being used and hasn't required that much alteration, apart from innovations such as Battery and Pantograph.

Indeed and actually I was surprised to learn that the 'D' or 'W', used to stand for Disabled/Wheelchair even had an LNER equivalent - 'I' for Invalid, applied to certain open saloon coaches
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top