Xenophon PCDGS
Veteran Member
I have heard the terminology of "passenger trains" as one being used since the onset of railway travel, but never the term "customer trains".
Surely passengers are customers who have bought a ticket?Customers are passengers who have bought a ticket.
How sad are you?
Rather cheerful actually... when I learnt that the Chef on the 1630 ex Kings Cross had done something 'rather horrific' to an whinging, complaining MP's soup sat in 1st.
"Oooh, that's much better" said the moaning sponger.![]()
To be fair, we are not passengers on trains, neither are we customers..... we're just cattle!
Customers have a "customer service" for complaints (supposed to help)
Passengers have "passenger information" for advice (also supposed to help)
So i don't think it matters perhaps we should think of a new name
I'd say it's a combination of both. From station to station when making a journey we are passengers but when buying tickets (whether walk up or advance, at the station or online) or more generally dealing with the fiscal side of the contract we are customers regardless of whether it's before or after we travel.
'Passenger' sounds like someone who happens to be being carried on a train service, like 'freight'. 'Customer' gives a far better sense of the core role they have. Rail services are about customers and customers alone.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
If the poll results were split between those who do and do not work in the rail industry I wonder what difference it would show? I suspect its within the rail industry itself that there's he real resistance to using 'customers'.