Old Timer
Established Member
I should not take too much notice of McNulty. He is one of these people who are paid to think the unthinkable by Governments from time to time.It all used to be much easier - you had to pass some sort of staffed barrier before you boarded, and there was someone to take your ticket when you got off. And your chances of not having your ticket checked on board were virtually nil. Now I can see why TOCs want to cut staff numbers and wages - but surely there comes a point where they're losing too much revenue by doing so -and McNulty seems to suggest more of the same.
I agree with you about demanning stations but that really has to be put down to Labour's failure to prohibit this in their desperate rush for money from every source.
The problem is that the TOCs are now run by accountants and managers who are incapable of recognising that there is a sizeable amount of fare evasion going on.
It becomes more iniquitous when stations are demanned, and in addition some TOCs will sell reduced rate tickets on board even when someone has boraded at a station where they could have purchased a ticket.
This is cloaked under the fatuous "Customer service" but its all supermarket style hype and balls really.
Rail passenger services are treated as distress purchases like washing machines and cookers by certain elements of the population - only paid for when there is no alternative. The sooner TOCs stop acting like supermarkets and start to address the proper manning and protection of revenue then we are going to get these continuing debates and issues. The thing is that I am convinced that there are some really large sums to be had simply by manning up stations properly. I proved this when I worked for BR, and I am certain that it still applies, indeed thinking about it, Flamingo mentioned the Port Talbot effect earlier !