Cherry_Picker
Established Member
In my opinion, 'parkway' designations should be only be reserved to stations which are over 3 miles (5km) from the place they are serving, or where the town already has a central station on the same line but the parkway serves as a park and ride (ie Warwick Parkway - Warwick).
A lot of it depends on who uses the station though. Often stations will be used by people who dont live in the town from which the station takes its name and they will be using it to travel into a bigger town or city. Warwick Parkway isnt a bad example, as a lot of its season ticket holders are from Kenilworth or Coventry due to its proximity to these places and its location on a main road (the A46, which is practically a motorway these days given how much of it is three lanes wide) which is used extensively by people from Kenilworth and Coventry. A lot of people who live in the suburbs of Coventry will have an easier time getting to Warwick Parkway station than they will getting to Coventry station due to the nature of the road network.
A better example would be another station on the Chiltern mainline, Haddenham & Thame Parkway. It is in the large village of Haddenham (pop 8000) and a couple of miles from the small town of Thame (pop 11000) but I would be curious to see how many of its commuters live in Aylesbury (5 miles away) or Oxford (10-15 miles away depending on what part of Oxford you are measuring to) as it can be of use to people who live in those locations, especially people who live in the suburbs where the two mile drive to the central station can take longer than the five mile drive to a Parkway station because of congestion. If you live in the heavily populated parts of Oxford which are on the east side of the river then home > Haddenham > Marylebone > office might be a faster journey than home > Oxford > Paddington > office. That is the business Parkway stations are trying to catch as far as I can tell.
There are plenty of stations which get used as Parkways but dont have the suffix. I imagine most of the ones on the M25 are used as park and ride stations. Beaconsfield (another station on the Chiltern line) certainly is. Beaconsfield is a tiny place, yet its station is very heavily used and has a massive multi story car park. The reason is because it is very easy to get to, it is literally two miles off the M40, one junction before the M40 meets the M25. It collects a lot of people coming down that road who dont want to take their car into central London due to lack of affordable parking or the congestion charge or the traffic jams that exist pretty much everywhere in the capital. Beaconsfield also collects lots of people who are driving in from the M4, I am reliably informed there are significant numbers of season ticket holders from Beaconsfield who live in Wiltshire and Gloucestershire. It's all about integrated transport, and how the railways can serve the roads or more specifically the people who are happy to drive along the open road but might not want to take their vehicle into congested urban areas. Parkway is a very good suffix to a station name to sum up that concept in a nutshell and as far as I am concerned it is a much more suitable way to reflect how the railways are used in the 21st century than suggesting that stations are there specifically to serve the nearest small village or market town they are located to.