zwk500
Veteran Member
That database will only be as good as the data input into it though. The only way those asset databases would be 100% complete is if the utility companies had done significant surveying work to first locate then digging to identify the assets. Otherwise they're relying on whatever records have survived up to 200 years through to whenever their predecessor maintainers started computerised record keeping. And those old records will be subject to the margin of error in mapping of the time, and may not have been updated with any changes in the however long since they were first made.Utilities like NR have been funded for decades by their respective regulators to have a robust asset database.
I would imagine the funding would only have been for converting existing records into a new system, at best. Not for validating the data.
It's not surprising those records aren't 100% complete, and that the ones that did survive aren't 100% accurate.



