I'm aware of someone on a train now, whose train was terminated short at the first station en-route (which the train wasn't even meant to call at).
The system offered the purchaser the option for "one click delay repay", but then wouldn't let them proceed, as it thinks they caught a train that didn't even call at the station in question.
I don't think TOCs should be allowed to roll out "one click" or automatic Delay Repay systems that are substandard; instead of pretending that the process will be easy, and then denying passengers their right to compensation, they may as well stick with manual claims.
I also believe there should be proper testing of such systems, and safeguards put in place to ensure that customers aren't mislead or denied legitimate claims; it's even worse when customers are encouraged to make claims only for them to be rejected.
I suspect that such systems are designed to tick boxes, so that operators can say to the DfT that they are doing a great job for passengers, when the actual experience is very poor. DfT don't care what passengers actually think, so will just be satisfied that operators are doing a good job.
I've deliberately not put the details of the train in question as the purchaser doesn't want a fuss to be made, but I the principle really needs to be highlighted, in my opinion.
This is what LNER say:
www.lner.co.uk
They are keen to encourage people to "book direct" instead of through a retailer that offers cheaper fares, such as the forum ticketing site, and use this dysfunctional feature as a means to encourage people to do this:
Has anyone else experienced similar? I expect most people have not, as I would assume that most people here book through the forum site
The system offered the purchaser the option for "one click delay repay", but then wouldn't let them proceed, as it thinks they caught a train that didn't even call at the station in question.
I don't think TOCs should be allowed to roll out "one click" or automatic Delay Repay systems that are substandard; instead of pretending that the process will be easy, and then denying passengers their right to compensation, they may as well stick with manual claims.
I also believe there should be proper testing of such systems, and safeguards put in place to ensure that customers aren't mislead or denied legitimate claims; it's even worse when customers are encouraged to make claims only for them to be rejected.
I suspect that such systems are designed to tick boxes, so that operators can say to the DfT that they are doing a great job for passengers, when the actual experience is very poor. DfT don't care what passengers actually think, so will just be satisfied that operators are doing a good job.
I've deliberately not put the details of the train in question as the purchaser doesn't want a fuss to be made, but I the principle really needs to be highlighted, in my opinion.
This is what LNER say:
Delay Repay | Cheap, Easy Rail Travel | LNER
If you're delayed on an LNER train for 30 minutes or more you're entitled to compensation. Choose to claim your compensation or donate it to CALM.
But the reality is very different.Discover the benefits of One-Click Delay Repay
- Hassle-free process: No forms to complete
- Quick confirmation: We will verify your claim within 30 minutes
They are keen to encourage people to "book direct" instead of through a retailer that offers cheaper fares, such as the forum ticketing site, and use this dysfunctional feature as a means to encourage people to do this:
One-click away
If you bought your ticket through the LNER website or app and opted into One-click Delay Repay, you'll receive an email within 30 minutes with a link to claim your compensation....
Has anyone else experienced similar? I expect most people have not, as I would assume that most people here book through the forum site