• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Old TOC Opinions

Status
Not open for further replies.

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,830
Location
Nowhere Heath
Indeed so, if GNER had done the same things as MML in terms of running services outside of their core interests, we may well not have gotten Grand Central or Hull Trains.

Greenback has a good point, in that GNER did seem over-frothed by the media. And we all know how far too many people will take the media's reports as fact!

As for people not sharing the view of doubling services on XC being a good thing, I don't think it's the doubling of service provision people have a problem with. Much, much more so the problem seems to be universally shared that the Voyagers were not long enough to deal with the huge increase in passenger numbers that came about.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,567
Location
Macclesfield
As for people not sharing the view of doubling services on XC being a good thing, I don't think it's the doubling of service provision people have a problem with. Much, much more so the problem seems to be universally shared that the Voyagers were not long enough to deal with the huge increase in passenger numbers that came about.

Yep, quite happy with doubling the service frequency, well and truly unimpressed with the abysmally small Voyagers.

GNERs’ PLANS weren’t that different to some of the things Midland Mainline did:
1. GNER did actually get round to doubling the service frequency to Leeds to half hourly, just like Midland Mainline did with Nottingham (It was EMT who doubled the Sheffield frequency, or is it the other way round?)
2. GNER planned to build a “Doncaster Parkway” station near the M18 south of Donny, whilst Midland Mainline planned East Midlands Parkway, which was then built under the EMT regime.
3. GNER planned to get hold of a couple of new Pendolino trains in around 2000, whilst Mildand Mainline got an entire new fleet of Meridians.
4. GNER intended on creating an “electric horseshoe” from Leeds to negate Leeds services having to reverse direction when departing back to London (No comparative MML project).

So there are a few similarities there. Big difference being that most of GNERs’ plans never got off the drawing board whilst Midland Mainline actually DID things.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
I can remember I travelled on the last ever ANW (was it?) Man Vic-Blackburn service on Saturday in 2004.

No it was First North Western who ran Man Vic-Blackburn. Arriva Trains Northern had the RRNE franchise before the single Northern franchise. Both franchises had frequent delays, cancellations and staff strikes.

I don't have all that negative opinion of Central. Yes some of their services weren't that punctual and were overcrowded but look at Liverpool-Norwich now and the end to end timings have been extended. New 170s were a good point related to CT.
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
10,291
I think willPS sums up ct. Good franchise managed badly so lots of problems. Splitting it up has lost many direct journeys. My soap box of Lincoln to Birmingham was only split because they didn't want Lincoln to be under xc.

Remember, it was Central that split Birmingham - Lincoln to what it is now
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,664
I travelled with midland mainline once, when i was 6 years old and i loved it, but i was 6 so the idea of a HST was fantastic to me :/
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,758
Location
Central Belt
Remember, it was Central that split Birmingham - Lincoln to what it is now

I should have made myself more clear. DaFT forced CT to split the route in preparation for splitting of the franchise. DaFT didn't want EMT into new street or XC into Lincoln. The passenger suffered as a result. CT took the blame for this policy probably out of fear of not getting the new franchise. Which they didn't anyway!
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
10,291
I should have made myself more clear. DaFT forced CT to split the route in preparation for splitting of the franchise. DaFT didn't want EMT into new street or XC into Lincoln. The passenger suffered as a result. CT took the blame for this policy probably out of fear of not getting the new franchise. Which they didn't anyway!

Like how they split Nottingham - Hereford as well!

Makes sense now :)
 

Daimler

Member
Joined
5 Feb 2009
Messages
1,197
Location
Hertfordshire
GNER was most definetly not something special, and only rail enthusiasts who never used it and are besoted by the livery sing their praises.

Nope, I used them, and while I liked the livery 'besotted' is going rather far (it's not quite Midland red or Caledonian blue, after all!). However, I would say that they were something special - travelling with GNER felt like an journey.

There sometimes seems to be a kind of anti-enthusiast knee-jerk reaction present, which seems as though companies such as WSMR and GNER criticised because they are popular with enthusiasts - travelling with them from a non-enthusiast perspective, I found GNER quite splendid.
 

Lampshade

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2009
Messages
3,777
Location
South London
Best thing about FNW was that they actually innovated, they had the Blackpool/Rochdale/Manchester Airport to London services which were doing rather well until moderation of competition came into play. They had rather good rolling stock as well with the 158s, 175s and the 180s were originally intended for them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,664
Best thing about FNW was that they actually innovated, they had the Blackpool/Rochdale/Manchester Airport to London services which were doing rather well until moderation of competition came into play. They had rather good rolling stock as well with the 158s, 175s and the 180s were originally intended for them.

The 180's orignially intended for them? never heard this before why did they not go to them?
 

AlexS

Established Member
Joined
7 Jun 2005
Messages
2,886
Location
Just outside the Black Country
Virgin Cross Country were totally wonderful with the loco hauled stock.

Not. Endless delightful summers and winters as shagged 47s fell over all over the shop resulting in no heat freight locos appearing. Great. 1998 Diesel Gala anyone? 56s, 37s, 47s, 31s, 33s, all sorts of random locos appearing all over the place. Even the odd 73. Good for bashers perhaps, not for those people who like ventilation in air conditioned coaches in the height of summer.

Comfortable perhaps but largely past it.

Not that the Voyagers are much better. Although the number of multi hour delays seemed to be reduced. At one stage you expected your VXC train to appear up to an hour or so late as a matter of course.

Central Trains were an interesting one. Tyseley seem to be one of the best DMU depots there are for keeping things going like rockets, but the trains were often filthy and again could be terribly unreliable. They seemed to get it together a bit towards the end though.
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,051
Location
Reston City Centre
There sometimes seems to be a kind of anti-enthusiast knee-jerk reaction present, which seems as though companies such as WSMR and GNER criticised because they are popular with enthusiasts

My criticism of this isn't "I dislike WMSR because they are popular" but more along the lines of "the things that make WMSR popular would be impossible to replicate at a Normal TOC". You can do pretty things with restaurants etc if you are a small-scale operation (who has to compete on quality), but I disagree when people say "...other operators should be more like them" because that's unrealistic
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
That's exactly what Virgin Cross Country did but is certainly not seen as a good thing by everyone.

True, but there's a big difference.

MML replaced an hourly seven car HST with an hourly seven car HST plus a 2 car Turbostar. They then replaced this with a seven car HST and a three car Turbostar. They were in the process of replacing these with a nine car Meridian and a four car Meridian every hour (I'm talking about the London to Nottingham and London to Derby services, which were both doubled by MML). So, at each stage, the service was getting bigger and better, with more capacity.

Virgin Cross Country replaced a (roughly) hourly HST/ loco hauled set with two Voyagers. Because of the short length of the Voyagers (remember a four car Voyager has fewer seats than a three car 170) this backfired.

If VXC had introduced Voyagers the length of the HSTs/ loco hauled sets they would have been wonderful. A lot of the reaction to Voyagers is down to their short length. IF they were longer, a lot of the criticisms wouldn't apply (they aren't the only units with smelly toilets, but it's easy to criticise unpopular units for additional things).

Talking of former TOCs, I don't think anyone has mentioned National Express's ScotRail. They doubled the frequency of the core Edinburgh - Glasgow service, they doubled the service to most of the Fife Circle, they ordered dozens of 170s and made a lot of improvements (many before the Scottish Parliament was up and running and throwing money at improvements).
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,622
Location
Hampshire
Im Supprised that Wessex Trains hasn't had mention yet?!

Ill add my piece later, but in short...

Virgin Cross Country - Fall from grace, originally a fairly good service with the 47s & HSTs, then the idea of the Voyagers came along, And operation Princess, and then the Railway & travel experts in the Goverment / DFT / SRA came along and so we had the wonders of 4car voyagers on routes where 7 or 8 was really needed, 5 car super voyagers which could only tilt on the West Coast Mainline & a small section in the chilterns? Personnaly id rather the 180s have been the reliable winner & the 220s & 221s being the faliures...

Wessex Trains - Not bad, Rolling Stock standards was really the only thing that let WT Down, Staff & Customer service was pretty good and god i used to love the 150 / 153 liveries!

MML - About the same really, bar the introduction of the 222s and the 150/153 bit :lol:

It's intresting to note National Express's fall from grace - not to bad a company untill the loss of Wessex, Scotrail & MML, The failed taking on of East Coast & The Companies complete failure of a Rebranding exersise in both the buses & rail businness - Including the well loved brand of...

ONE

A Bizzare thaught just crossed my mind...Trinny & Susannah Versus National Express - Not To Rebrand :lol:
 
Last edited:

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,758
Location
Central Belt
Like how they split Nottingham - Hereford as well!

Makes sense now :)

CT had many good through routes,

Skegness - Crewe
Liverpool - Stansted via Birmingham and Nuneaton
Chester - Grimsby
Aberystwth - Lincoln
Nottingham - Hereford

Yes you did import delays - but I always had the opinion sort out the delay rather than split the route!
 

4SRKT

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2009
Messages
4,409
The best 'TOC' bar none, and I'm surprised nobody's mentioned it, was the much maligned BR. Ah well, given the amount of moaning people did at the time about this wonderful organisation, this country thoroughly deserves the ill-coordinated, badly thought out mess of hideous expense and variable quality it's now lumbered with :(
 

klewer

Member
Joined
21 May 2009
Messages
122
First Great Eastern - very much missed. Mainline services ran far quicker as there was nowhere near as much timetable padding, trains were in far, far better condition than today and in the event of a major failure (a common thing on the GEML) they were much better at sorting out the mess and getting their customers to their destination. The whole franchise has been ruined by National Express.

However, things have changed a lot since the 90's; where most of the first round franchises were operating with a subsidy, the majority of the franchises in the ex-NSE area now pay a heady premium to the government.

No wonder standards have slipped - there's simply less money for the TOC to play with!
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
There's very little hasn't changed hands, been taken over or had the franchise area substantially redrawn- SWT hasn't really changed- and technically Virgin West Coast, though Virgin somewhat cheekily ran two franchises as one operation whilst they had XC. Everything else has, in some way, changed since privatisation, yes?
 

Old Timer

Established Member
Joined
24 Aug 2009
Messages
3,702
Location
On a plane somewhere at 35,000
I've not read the thread beyond the above gentleman's post, and I too question tbtc's "Enthusiasts *love* GNER" comment.

Relatively new forum members may not have heard/read my views on GNER before. I've not aired my thoughts on them for an absolute age now, so let's see what I remember of my most disliked TOC of all-time:.
I have to say that your comments on GNER are about as constructive and objective as a Polly Toynbee newspaper article.


......What also got my goat with GNER was how I never, EVER, managed to get on a train of theirs which was on-time. Something I believe most people found the opposite with, but even one minute late = late in my book. None of this "within 10 minutes for you, within 5 minutes for you" kind of nonsense..
So since when was GNER responsible for time-keeping ? Train running is in ther gift of Network Rail not the TOC. I travelled many, many times and the vast majority of my trains were on time. I only ever recall two delays being down to GNER, the rest were down to Railtrack/Network Rail and other TOCs. What I liked was that the staff came through with complaint forms advising passengers that they should fill them out to receive a refund. Never known any other TOC do that.

...Oh yes, I almost forgot. That campaign of theirs they promoted at every opportunity to keep the franchise. Not even Stagecoach would resort to such back-slapping measures. I refused point blank to respond to that campaign, I didn't want GNER to keep the franchise!.
Yet presumably you have no issue with other TOCs doing similar or some TOCs running to their friends in Downing St to garner support ?

...Memory fails to recall if there was anything else that I disliked/hated GNER for. I do remember seeing that GNER were being kicked out of the franchise on BBC News 24, I was celebrating that day! .
I am not surprised as there isn't one tangible reason that you have alluded to yet, purely based on your own personal likes and dislikes and not based on comparative experience. Obviously you were in a very small minority, which excluded the Railway press and objective commentators.

......I should point out that I didn't get a chance to try GNER's First Class, so the above is all from Standard Class experience. Whether the staff got down on their knees and answered to your beck and call throughout a journey I don't know. Somehow I doubt they treated you any differently, but I can't comment fairly there...
What about Silver Standard then ? Free paper, tea/coffe and biscuits and at seat service, with hot food brought from the restaurant vehicle There was no need for you to travel First Class to receive enhanced service. In Silver Standard, full fare paying passengers were guaranteed two vehicles which were available only to them. Contrast this with Virgin where the passenger paying full price on many routes in the peak is unable to find a seat as they have all been sold off for peanuts. GNER did not penalise the full fare paying passenger, instead they recognised that they were the basis upon which their profits depended.

.. With NXEC, I got to sample the delights of First Class from Newcastle to Edinburgh on a Tyne Valley diversion once, although I can't say the female First Class Host was at all impressed with my travelling in jeans and t-shirt in First Class! I don't recall too clearly the experience, as it was following a virtually sleepless night on Megabus, but I can't say that memory provides an experience superior to GNER.
Errrr. This does not make sense. Should can't read can ? NXEC was of course the TOC that set about stripping out the service standards, removing the on-train staff, reducing the food and menu availability. Same trains, same staff in all probability but somehow a better experience than GNER ?


...I'm sorry, but I've just read the rest of the thread and found your post. I must disagree with what you say with regards to GNER, particularly the part I've emboldened in the above quote. I don't think it matters particularly how regularly or not one travelled with GNER, one bad experience is enough to mark the TOC for life in my book! ...
Yet no objective explanation of what and when GNER did something to achieve this pinnacle of yours. And is that an approach you adopt to all other TOCs, retailers, transport services ? On that basis I doubt you actually travel anymore. Not had problems with your broadband, mobile reception, etc ?

Should WE judge you by the same values ?

....As for GNER vs Virgin, I believe I found things better on the Virgin side of things. I await someone brandishing a big wooden stick that's on fire in my direction for that view :lol:.
Which suggests a serious lack of travelling experience then.

..... I don't think it matters particularly how regularly or not one travelled with GNER.
So you obviously didn't travel regularly otherwise you would not have made that post. Your viewpoint contrasts diametrically with pretty much every travellers organisation. It certainly contrasts with my experience of airlines who are always in touch with their regular travellers to seek their views on their standards and performance.

As your post demonstrates greater travelling experience enables more objective views to be obtained. It also rules out those who adopt negative attitudes to organisations for perceived failures. From your posts I get the impression timekeeping was of some issue for you. You were either very very unlucky NEVER to catch a train on time or your journeys were so few as to be undemonstrative of the "normal" standard of service. Did you travel during the months and years after Hatfield ? As I said before train performance is not in the gift of the TOC, it can only run to the signals given.

...GNER winning awards on multiple occasions for customer service, I could very easily air my thoughts on that, however I think it's fairly obvious how I feel about that..
So on the basis of your own slanted view GNER dids not deserve this ? Presumably the very many objective people who formed the basis for the winning of the award must have been wrong then ?

The Pullman dining service, when I used it most regularly, on FGW was always very good and still reigns as the best service I've had in First Class. Indeed, it's the benchmark I use for comparing First Class service with other TOCs.
But not poor old GNER though ? From what I have read the GNER First Class service rated better, but as you never travelled First Class by GNER you would not know ?
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,310
Location
Yorks
I used to enjoy travelling on VXC in loco hauled days. Mk 2's are very comfy, so two thirds of the time it was excellent. However, they were also getting on a bit so the other third was made up of delays and cancellations, horrendous overcrowding malfunctioning buffet cars and locked out carriages etc :)

The Connexes, I'd moved oop North soon after privatisation, so I didn't really travel with them enough to experience the problems that led to franchise loss. They seemed to let some of their slammers get into a state though, not helped by the yellow/grey livery which always looked grubby, But generally fine - mainly due to the rolling stock.

GNER generally excellent, decent service - few probs. Same with NXEC, few problems, usually external.

Arriva trains Northern - lots of problems and delays here commuting between Leeds and Bradford (bit of an unfair comparison since this was the only defunct one I commuted on regularly). In truth, much of this due to the congested layout of Leeds at the time and the associated re-modelling. 308's were a definate bonus.

East Midlands Trains, used very rarely, however excellent when did.

BR mainly Network SouthEast, generally excellent 98% of the time.
 

tom1649

Member
Joined
5 Jul 2010
Messages
989
Virgin Cross Country were totally wonderful with the loco hauled stock.

Not. Endless delightful summers and winters as shagged 47s fell over all over the shop resulting in no heat freight locos appearing. Great. 1998 Diesel Gala anyone? 56s, 37s, 47s, 31s, 33s, all sorts of random locos appearing all over the place. Even the odd 73. Good for bashers perhaps, not for those people who like ventilation in air conditioned coaches in the height of summer.

Comfortable perhaps but largely past it.

At least you can lean out of a window on a Mk2. If the air con fails on a Voyager you are stuffed!
 

AlexS

Established Member
Joined
7 Jun 2005
Messages
2,886
Location
Just outside the Black Country
Yes, but the railway companies don't like you doing that in case you decapitate yourself.

The point is the fleet was well and truly past it by the time it was replaced. Virgin made an error in getting rid of the HSTs, especially when you see what other TOCs have done with them, for their busiest routes.

The loco hauled fleet was utterly knackered however and really had to go. A fleet of tired out 47s and some coaches that were getting as bad were never going to be feasible to carry on with.

Note I am not defending the Voyager as a replacement, at all. I've been as fed up as anyone being turned away from trains in the summer and having to sit on the floor outside the loo during normal travel times. I'm merely saying rose tinted spectacles can cloud what went before - and my memories of that are sitting on a set of coaches with a failed 47 on the front awaiting assistance outside of Bristol, a totally dead HST in the platform at Wolverhampton, running non stop Birmingham to Reading on a Bournemouth train because the booked loco had failed at Manchester previously and the train was 55 minutes late getting a replacement and so on. And a list of very big red DELAYED and CANCELLED markers that could not be pinned on Railtrack.
 

class156

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2009
Messages
153
Location
Irvine
I can't remember having any problems with nat-ex ScotRail but I was only 8 when the franchise transfered to First.
 

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,830
Location
Nowhere Heath
Old Timer, I'll see about replying in much more detail later, although I must say I entirely disagree with your comment about not travelling much. Nothing could be further from the truth, I travel all over the country at every opportunity.

You say that, in essence at least, my view of GNER is not worthy of airing. That's the impression I'm getting from your post, which is full of arrogance, sarcasm and attempts at being witty. I've said what I thought of GNER, and although you disagree with me entirely, tough.

Lack of travelling experience, biggest laugh I've had all day :lol:
 

bengolding

Member
Joined
31 Aug 2008
Messages
700
Location
Wentworth, Surrey
Midland Mainline were great during their franchise period, and not just for the free tea and coffee! Staff were friendly, turn up and go fares were great and the overhall of the timetable into a clockface one went very well. Only downside was ordering the two car Turbostars all those years ago. I still wonder why I bothered paying for First Class fares on those, which was effectively 2+2 in a small compartment.
 

Invincibles

Member
Joined
12 Jul 2009
Messages
511
Location
Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
I do not really want to get into the GNER debate, but I should say I found Virgin were very good at giving out compensation forms when there were delays. In the early days there were a lot so I did get quite a lot of compensation.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,310
Location
Yorks
Oh, I forgot, I commuted on Thames Trains for a bit. Pleasently uneventful - probably why I forgot.
 

LE Greys

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
5,389
Location
Hitchin
The thing I'll say about GNER is that they were trying to be a railway company rather than a TOC, and they were very good at it. They tried their best to improve presentation and show a professional image, as well as providing a very good service and a great increase in frequency. Bringing in spare Eurostars was a very good move, and it's unfortunate that they got taken away again.

As for VXC, I remember them well, not least because I have a nice bit of film of one of their 47s running round at Reading. They were certainly ambitious, looking at what happened with Operation Princess, but should never have let the HSTs slip through their fingers. Princess might have worked then, with a core of HSTs operating on the NE-SW route and Voyagers/Super Voyagers on everything else. We might then have seen an hourly service to Brighton, regular services to South Wales, Poole and Blackpool staying on the network and so on.

Thames Trains, also ambitious, but they still had Turbos running to Worcester and Hereford, not to mention path-blocking on the GWML mains. When First got hold of them, the capacity went up and the path-blocking ended. not to mention 180s on the Cotswold Line.

Connex, pretty horrible, but they did not have the chance to see what they could do with new stock (they ordered the Electrostars after all).

Anglia Railways, I've always thought it was unfortunate that GB Railways did not get the chance to run Greater Anglia, but when First took the company over, that stuffed their chances. Anglia did very well, providing something that looked genuinely Inter-City on the Norwich route and doing very well in growing the regional routes. Not bad.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,310
Location
Yorks
Connex, pretty horrible, but they did not have the chance to see what they could do with new stock (they ordered the Electrostars after all).

I'm not convinced it was the old stock that let them down. I think they let a lot of it become quite shabby (as opposed to SW trains for example who as I remember looked after theirs somewhat better, even facelifting some of it).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top