• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Old TOC Opinions

Status
Not open for further replies.

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
The CT, SL, VXC, GNER, Southern Connex, FGE etc franchises ended before I became properly interested in railways, but what were they like? I know people love GNER on here, but aren't too keen on Central trains etc.
Opinions?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

90019

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2008
Messages
6,890
Location
Featherstone, West Yorkshire
GNER I travelled with on a few occasions, and from my perspective were never anything that special, travelling from Edinburgh to London and back, it was always a fairly average journey.

VXC and Central, I only used 3 or 4 times each, so I can't give that much insight into them, but they were perfectly pleasant to travel on in my experience.


I'm predicting it won't be long before someone mentions GNER's livery :lol:
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
I'm predicting it won't be long before someone mentions GNER's livery :lol:

Stupid question - But why?

I can remember I travelled on the last ever ANW (was it?) Man Vic-Blackburn service on Saturday in 2004.

Northern had a countdown clock on the concourse, and being only 9 I didn't know what all the fuss was about :D
 

tom1649

Member
Joined
5 Jul 2010
Messages
989
GNER I travelled with on a few occasions, and from my perspective were never anything that special, travelling from Edinburgh to London and back, it was always a fairly average journey.

VXC and Central, I only used 3 or 4 times each, so I can't give that much insight into them, but they were perfectly pleasant to travel on in my experience.


I'm predicting it won't be long before someone mentions GNER's livery :lol:

VXC were fine when they had comfortable HSTs and loco hauled sets, hardly ever any capacity problems. When they made the switch to 4 car Voyagers my opinion of them slipped.

Central were very mixed, the service provided on our local line was patchy at best. It's far better under EMT, although some overcrowding now exists (not EMT's fault, but DFTs).
 

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
GNER I travelled with on a few occasions, and from my perspective were never anything that special, travelling from Edinburgh to London and back, it was always a fairly average journey.

I've been travelling up and down by train from London to Edinburgh all my life.

GNER was most definetly not something special, and only rail enthusiasts who never used it and are besoted by the livery sing their praises.
 

lm321412

Member
Joined
29 Apr 2010
Messages
537
Location
Birmingham
I used Central Trains alot as they was my local train company and to be fair, i've noticed the XCity line has gone down since LM have taken over!!

There often seems to be more cancellations these days but it has improved again since the last 18 months.

I used Silverlink County a few times aswell and they were fairly good but I cannot comment on Metro!

Also quite liked Midland Mainline too as they was quite a decent TOC (better than EMT mainline in terms of customer service)
 

WillPS

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2008
Messages
2,431
Location
Nottingham
Central Trains - great brand, great franchise on paper - but terrible management leading to staffing issues.

Midland Mainline - fab brand, really improved the service over time, adjusted their rolling stock to serve demand.

GNER - if I'm brutally honest they didn't really do much in their time, it wasn't until their abortive second period that they even refurbed the Mk.3s (which really needed it).

They're the only 3 I used.
 

rail-britain

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2007
Messages
4,102
GNER First Class was outstanding, if not better than InterCity, and certainly better than what InterCity and subsequently Virgin Trains offered initially
However, Virgin Trains (West Coast) revised their offerings to First Class ticket holders, making it quite a difference between Glasgow and London for the same price

The old Northern Spirit / Trans Pennine, was nothing short of a disaster and complaints
However, this was due to many basic issues, which seemed to impact the next issue (strike action, reliability, blockades, etc)
Virtually every week from when the franchise began there would be reports of cancellations, disruption, etc
 

Donny Dave

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2005
Messages
5,394
Location
Doncaster
GNER I travelled with on a few occasions, and from my perspective were never anything that special, travelling from Edinburgh to London and back, it was always a fairly average journey.

VXC and Central, I only used 3 or 4 times each, so I can't give that much insight into them, but they were perfectly pleasant to travel on in my experience.


I'm predicting it won't be long before someone mentions GNER's livery :lol:

I've been travelling up and down by train from London to Edinburgh all my life.

GNER was most definetly not something special, and only rail enthusiasts who never used it and are besoted by the livery sing their praises.

I can't comment on VXC or CT as I didn't use them much, but I did use GNER quite a bit.

Too get the livery froth :roll: out of the way, I found the GNER livery to be simple, elegent and effective. IE. It promoted who they were very effectively, without being garish or "in your face".

Anyway. Everytime I used a GNER service, the staff would go out of their way to be courteous towards you, most of the time, making you feel like a valued passenger, especially when you travelled in first class, not just another person using a train to get from A to B.

Those standards declined drastically under National Express, but thankfully are starting to be restored while the ECML are being operated by DOR.

The only TOCs who approach the standards of GNER are Grand Central and TPE. (East Coast, Grand Central and TPE are the TOCs I use the most. Because of that, I can't give a definate opinion of what other TOCs are like, as I don't use them that often.)
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,051
Location
Reston City Centre
Hard to know how to define a franchise. Do the staffing problems count for more than the ambitions?

Midland Mainline would have to be the best. Doubling the service from the East Midlands to London, introducing new direct links to the capital from towns like Barnsley/ Matlock/ Burton, then introducing additional coaches to the 170s, then replacing the 170s with Meridians, at the same time as trying to introduce further things (hourly Leeds service).

One thing people forget is just how shoddy some operating areas of BR were before privatisation, in terms of staffing, resources, organisation. Northern Spirit and Central Trains had a lot of problems but these were mainly inherited from BR (except all the cancelled trains weren't as much of an issue back then)

GNER had possibly the easiest franchise to take over, with a relatively modern train set and none of the problems that beset other TOCs. They concentrated on little details well (they failed to introduce any new trains or new routes, whereas NXEC planned the Lincoln trains etc). Enthusiasts *love* GNER though, which makes it hard to assess the company rationally. For example NXEC were criticised for the poor crisp selection on their buffets, because nobody is as perfect as GNER. A bit odd...

(this thread will run and run and end up squabbling about something really trivial, as usual)
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,074
Location
Redcar
Enthusiasts *love* GNER though, which makes it hard to assess the company rationally.

Why though? I travelled on GNER a few times and can't say I was ever blown away by the on board experience offered to me, in fact (and I might get crucified for this but) I didn't notice any real difference between GNER and NXEC in terms of on board experience.

Now I should mention that in both cases I never used first class indeed my first experience of first class on the east coast was with EC earlier this year! So I am willing to accept that there was difference in the first class provision. But to me in standard, no difference.
 

Greenback

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
9 Aug 2009
Messages
15,268
Location
Llanelli
I was impressed with the GNER service, particularly in First Class, on the journeys I made with them to the North East, Leeds and Scotland.

I found Connex South Eastern to be generalyl unpleasant to travel, dirty, unfirendly staff and grubby stations for the most part, although there were isolated incidents of better service and environments!

I can't really see a lot of difference between VXC and AXC except for the lack of shops.

I didn't really travel on most of the other old TOC's, apart from maybe the odd journey.
 

Donny Dave

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2005
Messages
5,394
Location
Doncaster
GNER probably did have the easiest franchise, but their attention to details and how they treated their passengers set them apart from all the other TOCs that I used at the time.

Under National Express, standards (and staff morale) dropped drastically. Before I stopped using NXEC services and used alternative when travelling (such as TPE+MML/EMT when going to London for example), I did have quite a few conversations with "normals" talking about how GNER were better. Those conversations were mostly about staff attitudes and quality of service under NXEC compared to GNER, with very few complimentary comments directed towards NXEC. On discovering that I was an enthusiast, several people even asked me if there was any alternatives to NXEC, which even surprised me!

The upshot of all those conversations was that I found the majority of passengers (regular commuters and occasional passengers alike) did not like the way NXEC went about things and the treatment of passengers, and much preferred the GNER "regime" that went before them.
 

Old Timer

Established Member
Joined
24 Aug 2009
Messages
3,702
Location
On a plane somewhere at 35,000
Only people who have their own particular drum to beat berate GNER. Many probably only travelled by them occasionally.

GNER constantly won accolades for its customer service.

I travelled extensively in both standard and First Class on GNER and in my overall experience I have nothing but praise for them, indeed I preferred travelling with them in comparison to Virgin. So much so that I would motor over to a GNER station rather than use Virgin because the difference in customer service was that big.

I have travelled first class with many other operators and sometimes one wonders exactly WHAT you are getting for the extra money.

Not everyone who visits here and posts is a spotter and some of us have far wider experience of travelling generally. Viewing favourably does not automatically mark one down as a spotter.
 

Class37Fan

Member
Joined
13 Oct 2010
Messages
6
Location
Ayrshire
I used to travel on Connex Trains back in 02 untill they became Govia, then South Centeral Trains, and nowdays known as Southern.

Connex seemed to be able to opperate to their schedueld Timetable or even arrive a minute of two early some times (That was always nice).
 

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,830
Location
Nowhere Heath
Why though? I travelled on GNER a few times and can't say I was ever blown away by the on board experience offered to me, in fact (and I might get crucified for this but) I didn't notice any real difference between GNER and NXEC in terms of on board experience.

I've not read the thread beyond the above gentleman's post, and I too question tbtc's "Enthusiasts *love* GNER" comment.

Relatively new forum members may not have heard/read my views on GNER before. I've not aired my thoughts on them for an absolute age now, so let's see what I remember of my most disliked TOC of all-time:

One thing I hated the most, possibly even dispised, about GNER was their "We're better than you" attitude. Most people seem to have found their staff to be excellent, but I had major problems with them. Without going into mahoosive detail, I'd summarise a fair number of their staff as the railway's equivelent of the Conservatives.

Their buffet service was not too awesome either, I found it stupidly expensive and didn't carry much at all I liked. I'm a bit fussy with food, but I'm not *that* bad. You know it's bad when you want to get something substantial to eat for tea and walk away with a packet of crisps and a KitKat!

I also used to have a massive disliking of the Mallard-ising of the MK4s and HSTs. That much I've chilled out on now, as I've had some decent rides on ECML stock in the last few years.

Dare I mention the livery? ;) Most people you ask will talk endlessly about how excellent it was. If you are thinking I'm such a person, you're most definitely incorrect. I forget currently at this unsociable hour why I hated it so much, but I did. I'll have a look in a bit to find a post explaining my dislike, I know it's somewhere!

What also got my goat with GNER was how I never, EVER, managed to get on a train of theirs which was on-time. Something I believe most people found the opposite with, but even one minute late = late in my book. None of this "within 10 minutes for you, within 5 minutes for you" kind of nonsense.

Oh yes, I almost forgot. That campaign of theirs they promoted at every opportunity to keep the franchise. Not even Stagecoach would resort to such back-slapping measures. I refused point blank to respond to that campaign, I didn't want GNER to keep the franchise!

Memory fails to recall if there was anything else that I disliked/hated GNER for. I do remember seeing that GNER were being kicked out of the franchise on BBC News 24, I was celebrating that day!

I should point out that I didn't get a chance to try GNER's First Class, so the above is all from Standard Class experience. Whether the staff got down on their knees and answered to your beck and call throughout a journey I don't know. Somehow I doubt they treated you any differently, but I can't comment fairly there. With NXEC, I got to sample the delights of First Class from Newcastle to Edinburgh on a Tyne Valley diversion once, although I can't say the female First Class Host was at all impressed with my travelling in jeans and t-shirt in First Class! I don't recall too clearly the experience, as it was following a virtually sleepless night on Megabus, but I can't say that memory provides an experience superior to GNER.

Now, Central Trains. I used them an awful lot on a variety of journies when I used to live in Herefordshire, as they were the only real way to get to the Midlands from Hereford. They had a lot of problems, of that there cannot be any doubt. One thing I did like that happened under Central Trains though was that the Hereford services got 170s, a huge improvement in terms of comfort to the 150s which we had before them. I also seem to recall for some years Hereford to Birmingham was via Kidderminster to get to Birmingham New Street. Changing that to run via Bromsgrove and the Lickey was certainly one thing that was a big improvement. I don't know when that change came into being, but it was definitely sometime between 1996 and 2001, with my memory suggesting sometime in 2000.

So yes, we had problems with Central Trains. The one thing that always lives in my memory of them was the amount of times they'd turn back Hereford trains at Ledbury or Great Malvern due to late running. Thankfully, that's changed to being a much less regular issue under London Midland.

Virgin XC, that was a franchise change I didn't approve of. Still not a fan of it. Some people on here may recall my voicing of the opinion that things would get worse (or was it not improve? It's been a while) under Arriva, suggesting I seem to recall that I'd give it 6 months and see how things were then. Memory suggests that things didn't improve and pretty much all of the problems we had under Virgin still existed. I believe Arriva have done jack squat to make the franchise a winner. Yes they re-introduced HSTs, but the fact they don't use them all due to the cost is just ridiculous, and quite frankly a waste of resources.

The removal of the shop, well I'll be honest and I'm not sure whether that was a good or bad thing. Good in that you no longer have people queuing up to get drinks, food etc whilst others trying squeezing past to get on/off at stations. Bad in that whilst there is also more luggage space, the trolley service isn't exactly adequate and often can't get to passengers anyway.

Granted, Virgin introduced the Voyagers, but let's not go there. Would Arriva have done any better? Considering they can't afford to use all of their fleet of HSTs, one cannot imagine they'd have ordered a better fleet of trains than Virgin!

Midland Mainline, I was less than amused that they went. They really were a good franchise which had a good reputation for timekeeping and customer service. I didn't get to travel on their services a huge amount, however what I did travel on with them was usually a good experience. Free coffee helped, I really didn't believe that offer was real when I first tried it! :lol:

They had their flaws, of course. The introduction of Meridians still winds me up, more so the fact so many people seem to think they're excellent trains. If you like your table vibrating excessively on departure from a station, causing your coffee to go everywhere, then fine. I, however, like to drink my coffee! Mind you, Meridians don't seem to suffer the smelly lavatories problem that Voyagers do, which has to be a good thing. Doesn't mean I like Meridians though, especially since EMT put those overly-perfume-y things in the lavatories. By gosh, those stink!

First Class, I used it a few times with MML. One particular instance was from Nottingham to Loughborough and back, as I'd never used MML before, travelled on their HSTs or Meridians in First Class and found a bargain £10 day return to do just that. Wearing a t-shirt and jeans, as I often do on a trip out, the staff didn't seem to even move their eyebrows at such an idea. Quite happy to serve the complimentary coffee and so forth almost straight away from Nottingham, which I of course made sure I had before alighting at Loughborough. Absolutely stunning experience in First Class, I'd always recommend it.

On the Meridian, however, no. The service was extremely stunning again, but departure from Beeston on the way to Nottingham caused excessive vibrations and I lost the coffee to the table. The First Class host seemed perfectly happy to clean it up and pour me another, offering some absolutely delicious chocolate snacks. I don't know what they were, but dang, they were nice!

This reply's starting to get long, so let's finish for now at least on the remaining two I've seen mentioned in this thread. Silverlink first. I never really had the opportunity to travel on their trains, but no complaints from me. Not that I'd expect to have many when most of the time I only travelled between Harrow and Wealdstone and Euston with them mind! :lol:

Connex South Eastern, they were gone before I got into the rail scene I believe so I have no comments there ("phew!" I hear you thinking!).

Oh yes, Arriva Trains Northern. I never travelled on their trains, so again no comment. Same for the pre-First TPE services. (hears sighs of relief across the globe :lol:)

Finally, almost forgot to mention Wessex Trains. I can't say they were my favourite (nor Wales and Borders for that matter), but I dunno, it was a shame to see them go. I travelled on both Wessex Trains and Wales and Borders services quite regularly, however I fail at this uberly unsociable hour (it's been over 40 minutes since I started typing, and it's 0231) to remember anything hugely negative or hugely positive about either of them right now.

Right, that'll do. I can't recall the names of any other former franchises as things stand, so I'll leave it at that. Sorry for the very long post, I obviously had a lot to say! :lol:
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Only people who have their own particular drum to beat berate GNER. Many probably only travelled by them occasionally.

GNER constantly won accolades for its customer service.

I travelled extensively in both standard and First Class on GNER and in my overall experience I have nothing but praise for them, indeed I preferred travelling with them in comparison to Virgin. So much so that I would motor over to a GNER station rather than use Virgin because the difference in customer service was that big.

I have travelled first class with many other operators and sometimes one wonders exactly WHAT you are getting for the extra money.

Not everyone who visits here and posts is a spotter and some of us have far wider experience of travelling generally. Viewing favourably does not automatically mark one down as a spotter.

I'm sorry, but I've just read the rest of the thread and found your post. I must disagree with what you say with regards to GNER, particularly the part I've emboldened in the above quote. I don't think it matters particularly how regularly or not one travelled with GNER, one bad experience is enough to mark the TOC for life in my book! I have little doubt either yourself or others will disagree with that comment and/or the comments I've made already on GNER, feel free to debate them.

As for GNER vs Virgin, I believe I found things better on the Virgin side of things. I await someone brandishing a big wooden stick that's on fire in my direction for that view :lol:

GNER winning awards on multiple occasions for customer service, I could very easily air my thoughts on that, however I think it's fairly obvious how I feel about that.

Finally, as for wondering what other TOCs offer for First Class passengers, I've found my experiences in First Class to be broadly very good with FGW. MML a close second. I've already commented in my previous post that I didn't travel in First Class with GNER, so I can't comment on that fairly. The Pullman dining service, when I used it most regularly, on FGW was always very good and still reigns as the best service I've had in First Class. Indeed, it's the benchmark I use for comparing First Class service with other TOCs.
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,758
Location
Central Belt
I think willPS sums up ct. Good franchise managed badly so lots of problems. Splitting it up has lost many direct journeys. My soap box of Lincoln to Birmingham was only split because they didn't want Lincoln to be under xc.
 

imagination

Member
Joined
3 Aug 2010
Messages
502
I found Connex South Eastern to be generalyl unpleasant to travel, dirty, unfirendly staff and grubby stations for the most part, although there were isolated incidents of better service and environments!

What mythical place was this?

Anyway, from my vague memories of when I lived in the area, First Great Eastern was very good. :)
It had only stopped being Network South East about a year before we moved out though.
 

PR1Berske

Established Member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
3,025
I remember First North Western being a whole host of fun. I suppose being the first franchise holder was not going to be an easy ride, but the amount of hassle with delays and cancellations was stunning...
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,567
Location
Macclesfield
Prepare for a long scroll of nostalgic opinionated waffle: :D;)

I don’t know what the first class offerings were like under the regimes of the old operators, this was a time before I’d begun to regularly sample the delights of first class, so all my views are from the perspective of a standard class passenger:

Great North Eastern Railway, I thought, were great, and I travelled semi-regularly on their trains. They always gave me the feeling that they were trying to provide the best service that they possibly could, and were really focused around the passenger and making the journey an enjoyable experience. They took the already excellent Intercity East Coast operation and honed it to make something even better. As has been said they benefitted from having quite a modern train fleet, and the biggest criticism I can level at GNER is that early in the franchise they didn’t lavish enough attention on the mark 4s, which I recall in around 2000-2001 were looking decidedly ropey and uncared for. I’m also still very impressed with the standard of the “Mallard” refurbishment, which I think has turned East Coast trains into the most comfortable Intercity trains in the UK at the moment.

From a distinctly personal viewpoint, I absolutely loved Northern Spirit because they were my local operator, and the wonderful new blue and green livery was a vibrant step change from “dull old BR”! But, a fancy livery does not make a train operator successful, so viewing them critically, they didn’t ‘alf have their problems, with staffing and rolling stock shortages. Withdrawing the 141s, whilst just about unavoidable due to their dire performance record, without introducing anything to plug the gap was a really bad move that has no doubt been a critical factor in accentuating the current capacity woes for Northern. I never had any issues with NS, so I was very happy with them, and at least we got a few more Sprinters and less Pacers around the north east than is now the case.

Virgin Crosscountry before “Operation Princess” and Voyagerisation was decidedly dodgy. A patchy service with regularly short formed trains that frequently ran late, and what seemed like loco failures here, there and everywhere. I have plenty of memories of bizarre train formations, such as West Coast DVTs and carriage rakes turning up a long way from where they should be and “double headers” with 47s, 86s or 87s hauling dead classmates around: Fantastic from an enthusiast point of view, but lousy if you actually wanted to get anywhere! Although XC and West Coast didn’t have any say in the trains they inherited, for an operation that had come from the keen commercial mind of Richard Branson the service offered was amazingly bland. I do commend them for completely renewing the train fleet and introducing the Voyagers though, even if I do hate the blasted things and that they’re completely not up to spec for the tasks they’re performing, as finally the service became reliable and a more attractive proposition (after many teething troubles).

Central Trains were patchy. Lots of management issues that really ruined the franchise, and despite a rather flashy livery, their train cleaning and maintenance practices left a lot to be desired. Conversely, one of National Express’ other initial franchises, Scotrail, were pretty good from my experience with them. One of the better early franchises.

That’s pretty much the limit of my experience of the early franchises, so I can’t comment on any of the others, except to say that I really liked the liveries of Great Western Trains, Midland Mainline and North West Trains: No idea what they were like as operators though!
 

Invincibles

Member
Joined
12 Jul 2009
Messages
511
Location
Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
Midland Mainline were very good, they brought in the turbostars, lengthened them and then got the Meridians. This really improved travel between London and Leicester and then on to the north when I wanted to go there.

Rio was not their idea, but it was a very good train and the opportunity to have something like that run by a meridian now would be brilliant. The journey time from Leicester to Manchester was amazingly fast compared to any of the current options.

Really with Midland Mainline it was the free coffee and the fact they had comfortable trains on every route. I did not need Barnsley, Burton or Matlock but I was impressed that those destinations were brought into the franchise.

Central trains certainly had issues but I think that was the right franchise for what it did, it meant the through journeys people have mentioned above, the major one that has gone is the Nottingham to Birmingham/Coventry service meaning Loughborough and East Midlands Parkway do not have a direct service to Birmingham. Lincoln was then the extension of that, as has been mentioned.

First North Western were my franchise for my early days in Manchester, they did what I needed them to and introduced the 175s on Manchester - Preston - Windermere/Barrow. This was a welcome improvement on the 156. Of course things are better still now with TPE and the 185s but First always seemed to be trying with what is a poison chalice of a franchise.

The Transpennine franchises were ok, there were issues and strikes, but I was a little saddened to see the old 158s given the purple stripe. No doubt it is good now but the loss of Blackpool - Preston - Leeds from that franchise did seem a shame.

I did not travel very often in the south, but I think they make too much of delays down there. It always seems an inevitability of old trains and almost full capacity lines that the franchise will struggle. Now they have new trains there are still problems, just the environment you get stuck in is better.

GNER were ok, I travelled with them a few times but do not get really excited about them. The livery was good, and the use of the crest was good, but I really do not spend too long worrying about liveries.
 

Z12XE

Member
Joined
30 Sep 2005
Messages
876
Anyway, from my vague memories of when I lived in the area, First Great Eastern was very good. :)

They got there in the end, but in the early years it wasn't the best setup.

Another dead TOC (and best place for them) is Anglia Railways, they must have had the best PR department of any train operator, as they were able to make a pretty grotty and unrelilable TOC look brilliant. Still to this day there is a couple of rail user groups who will always use "bring back Anglia Railways" as their get out clause in any discussion, despite getting a better and more frequent service from the current operator.
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,051
Location
Reston City Centre
Why though? I travelled on GNER a few times and can't say I was ever blown away by the on board experience offered to me, in fact (and I might get crucified for this but) I didn't notice any real difference between GNER and NXEC in terms of on board experience.

Now I should mention that in both cases I never used first class indeed my first experience of first class on the east coast was with EC earlier this year! So I am willing to accept that there was difference in the first class provision. But to me in standard, no difference.

I'm not entirely sure *why* GNER are so adored by some, I think it's probably because they seemed to set themselves apart from the rest of the railways, it became a "Marmite" thing, where people loved or hated them.

Maybe the staff in First Class were amazing, but I don't remember them being "out of the ordionary" in Standard. And any TOC which insists you upgrade to get a brilliant level of staff attention is always going to dissapoint the majority of their passengers.

Meh. If you compare GNER (who did little to change the franchise over many years) to MML (who doubled the frequency, introduced two new classes of trains, introduced new links to London etc) then I think it's obvious which I preferred.

If GNER had been a bit more proactive, and made the improvements to their franchise that MML made to theirs then maybe they wouldn't have left the door open to Open Access on the ECML, as places like Hull/ Bradford/ Teesside/ Sunderland would have had some/ better London service from GNER. Instead, they stuck to the basics, and gave a pretty plush First Class environment. Not the choice I'd have made.
 

Greenback

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
9 Aug 2009
Messages
15,268
Location
Llanelli
Interesting. I wonder how much of the positivity about GNER came from the railway press extolling the virtues of the proper cutlery stamped with the logo and that sort of thing? When you constantly read and hear how good something is, there must be a chance that you will be influenced into agreeing with the popular perception?
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,051
Location
Reston City Centre
Interesting. I wonder how much of the positivity about GNER came from the railway press extolling the virtues of the proper cutlery stamped with the logo and that sort of thing? When you constantly read and hear how good something is, there must be a chance that you will be influenced into agreeing with the popular perception?

That's a fair point.

GNER appealed to people who liked a bit of "tradition" (the crest, the name that sounded like LNER, the conservative livery that looked like a Union Flag, the posh cutlery), a lot of what they did would have been more suited to an Open Access operator (who can afford those "little touches").

I can see why some enthusiasts liked them, as they were quite "different", but (as someone who doesn't want a resturant meal on his journey) I'm more interested in other things.
 

Zoe

Established Member
Joined
22 Aug 2008
Messages
5,905
Meh. If you compare GNER (who did little to change the franchise over many years) to MML who doubled the frequency, introduced two new classes of trains
That's exactly what Virgin Cross Country did but is certainly not seen as a good thing by everyone.
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,567
Location
Macclesfield
That's exactly what Virgin Cross Country did but is certainly not seen as a good thing by everyone.

Very good point. When you would think that increasing service frequency and introducing new train fleets will always be viewed positively, it doesn’t seem to always be the case. It seems that success of a TOC is more about careful management and making sensible decisions with an eye for the medium term future than just bulk buying a squadron fleet of new trains whether they are suitable for the service or not. Crosscountry lost important things such as capacity and decent buffet facilities when they renewed their train fleet, whilst MML continued to provide a similar quality of service throughout the franchise after the Meridians came along.

With regards to GNER, I honestly do believe that they were a very good company, without blindly following any popular opinion. I never travelled with the Midland Mainline of old, but it sounds as if had I done so, I may have a different comparative view of GNER. It is true that GNER didn’t make changes as ambitiously as MML, instead focusing on their core activities and improving their existing product, perhaps ignoring some opportunities for development away from that, whilst MML looked to where they could expand their operations to improve things for travellers. Two very different approaches to running successful franchises.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top